DEVELOPMENT
AFD_2025_English
AFD_2025_English
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5 A host of questions for AFD<br />
Foresighting for Development<br />
Development agencies, steering through future worlds. Afd2025<br />
I<br />
Finally, the SDG agenda will most likely be a game changer due to its universal scope<br />
and at the same time render the notion of development assistance more vague, or even<br />
obsolete. By 2025, will the OECD-DAC list of recipients still make sense? Even if it continues<br />
to exist, its composition will evolve, and as will possibly the way it is used. Will the donors’<br />
choice of intervention zones in line with the list still make sense? When countries graduate<br />
from the DAC list, they may request regulatory harmonization or the implementation of<br />
special public policies (e.g., Turkey’s EU accession process). For middle-income countries,<br />
the obstacles to accessing long-term financing will certainly be felt at a time when they<br />
may need it most and when their development choices can strongly impact the rest of<br />
the international community.<br />
The richest countries will be open to taking up ideas and innovations – also from other<br />
regions in the world – that enable them to capitalize on their expertise and to successfully<br />
see through socio-economic transitions, for which there are no set or universal recipes.<br />
In a world of competing models (i.e. “Babel 3.0”) or in the world of “Aligning Aspirations”,<br />
achieving sustainable development may mean supporting such an approach.<br />
“The universal nature of the SDGs will result in the explosion of the North/South<br />
mandate” A French senior civil servant.<br />
‐<br />
The amplitude that each of these themes could take within the donors’ activities, and the<br />
way in which the donors could address them (objectives, organization, tools, resources)<br />
of course depends on many other factors to be discussed in the following section.<br />
62