17.10.2016 Views

Understanding Acoustic Emission Testing- Reading 1 Part B-A

Understanding Acoustic Emission Testing- Reading 1 Part B-A

Understanding Acoustic Emission Testing- Reading 1 Part B-A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In 1965, however, Robinson used more sensitive equipment to show that<br />

acoustic emission occurred at much lower load levels than had been reported<br />

earlier, and hence, could be used to monitor earlier microcracking (such as<br />

that involved in the growth of bond cracks in the interfacial region between<br />

cement and aggregate).<br />

In 1970, Wells built a still more sensitive apparatus, with which he could<br />

monitor acoustic emissions in the frequency range from about 2 to 20 kHz.<br />

However, he was unable to obtain truly reproducible records for the various<br />

specimen types that he tested, probably due to the difficulties in eliminating<br />

external noise from the testing machine. Also in 1970, Green reported a much<br />

more extensive series of tests, recording acoustic emission frequencies up to<br />

100 kHz. Green was the first to show clearly that acoustic emissions from<br />

concrete are related to failure processes within the material; using source<br />

location techniques, he was also able to determine the locations of defects. It<br />

was this work that indicated that acoustic emissions could be used as an<br />

early warning of failure. Green also noted the Kaiser effect, which suggested<br />

to him that acoustic emission techniques could be used to indicate the<br />

previous maximum stress to which the concrete had been subjected. As we<br />

will see below, however, a true Kaiser effect appears not to exist for concrete.<br />

Charlie Chong/ Fion Zhang

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!