11.12.2012 Views

Pro-Poor Value Chain Development - Capacity.org

Pro-Poor Value Chain Development - Capacity.org

Pro-Poor Value Chain Development - Capacity.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148<br />

BOAM’s engagement in the fruit value chains<br />

The BOAM intervention was mainly concentrated in SPNNRS, particularly Arbaminch<br />

area and Chuko and Dara woredas 1 .<br />

Box A4.1 Overview of BOAM fruit value chains<br />

Pineapple value chain<br />

(2005 – 2011)<br />

Highland Fruits<br />

(mainly apple) value chain<br />

(2007-2011)<br />

Mango value chain<br />

(2007-2011)<br />

Chuko and Dara woredas in Sidama zone<br />

Chencha and other 7 highland fruit growing<br />

woredas near Arbaminch, Hula, Bule & Ezha<br />

woredas<br />

Arbaminch Zuria woreda, Mirab Abaya woreda<br />

and 8 woredas in Wollaita<br />

Four broad categories of interventions can be distinguished:<br />

1. Sector development<br />

2. Business development<br />

3. Knowledge development and learning<br />

4. Service provider development<br />

Sector development<br />

The sector development component aimed to strengthen the sector as a whole and<br />

included interventions that served the interests of all actors involved in the value<br />

chain. In the case of the fruit chains the following sector development instruments<br />

were most relevant.<br />

1. Facilitating the establishment of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms<br />

2. Generating and disseminating Market Intelligence<br />

3. <strong>Pro</strong>moting Appropriate Technology<br />

Facilitating the establishment of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms<br />

For each of the three fruit value chains (mango, apple and pineapple) BOAM<br />

facilitated the establishment of a multi-stakeholder forum known as a Coordination<br />

Group (CG). The CGs provided a platform where public and private stakeholders<br />

could meet on a regular basis to discuss how to further develop the chain. The CGs<br />

were instrumental in establishing new partnerships, sharing market intelligence and<br />

disseminating technical knowledge on issues such as improved husbandry practices<br />

and disease management.<br />

One of the first activities undertaken by each of the Coordination Groups was to<br />

develop a Strategic Intervention Plan (SIP). Initially, the focus of each plan was<br />

quite different. The SIP for pineapples contained a very broad range of interventions.<br />

The mango and highland fruit value chains adopted a two-pronged approach that<br />

simultaneously addressed the provision of quality planting material and services to<br />

producers, and the strengthening of farmers’ <strong>org</strong>anisations and linking them to other<br />

actors in the chain. Over time, as the SIPs were gradually revised and improved,<br />

there was more convergence in the approach taken. The most recent SIPs are<br />

characterised by three main types of intervention:<br />

• Establishing market arrangements between wholesale traders or processors and<br />

farmers’ <strong>org</strong>anisations;<br />

• Improving the quality of supplies for fresh fruit consumption and processing;<br />

• Expanding into new market segments and products.<br />

1 A woreda is a local administrative unit that is equivalent to a district

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!