11.12.2012 Views

Pro-Poor Value Chain Development - Capacity.org

Pro-Poor Value Chain Development - Capacity.org

Pro-Poor Value Chain Development - Capacity.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7<br />

Adapting the value chain approach to reach the poorest<br />

rural households<br />

Nicholas Nyathi and Genzeb Akele<br />

BOAM’s work on value chain development has inspired other <strong>org</strong>anisations to<br />

apply similar approaches. In 2008 SNV was invited to participate in designing a<br />

new USAID-funded project, <strong>Pro</strong>ductive Safety Net <strong>Pro</strong>gramme Plus (PSNP Plus) in<br />

Ethiopia. PSNP Plus, which started in October 2008 and came to a conclusion in<br />

2011, was implemented by a consortium of development <strong>org</strong>anisations including<br />

CARE Ethiopia, Catholic Relief Services, the Relief Society of Tigray and Save the<br />

Children-UK. The aim of the programme was to complement the government-run<br />

<strong>Pro</strong>ductive Safety Net <strong>Pro</strong>gramme (PSNP) which aims to enhance food security and<br />

ensure that food-insecure households are able to maintain valuable assets such as<br />

tools, equipment and livestock on which their livelihoods depend, for instance after a<br />

drought.<br />

PSNP Plus provided support to 47,414 households to gain access to financial services<br />

and functioning markets with a view to enabling them to generate a regular income<br />

and become more resilient. In this way, such households could subsequently<br />

‘graduate’ out of the Government’s safety net programme. The main funder, USAID,<br />

contributed close to 16US$ million for the project, with the other consortium<br />

partners contributing 516,900 US$.<br />

Attempting to upscale BOAM’s value chain approach within the context of the PSNP<br />

Plus programme presented a new challenge for SNV. As described in the previous<br />

chapters, BOAM typically focused on smallholder farmers producing enough to<br />

meet their subsistence needs and earn a cash income. The PSNP and PSNP Plus<br />

programmes, on the other hand, were explicitly targeted at ‘the poorest of the<br />

poor.’ For the most part, this target group consists of food-insecure households that<br />

operate at the most basic subsistence level. This chapter discusses a number of<br />

adjustments that were made to tailor the BOAM approach to address the needs of<br />

this group.<br />

Introduction<br />

The PSNP Plus strategy sought to support the development of four value chains;<br />

honey, livestock (small ruminants), haricot beans and cereals (Ethiopia’s staple<br />

food tef as well as s<strong>org</strong>hum, wheat and maize). The value chain approach was<br />

implemented in 12 woredas (the Ethiopian equivalent of a district) in the four<br />

regions of the country, Tigray, Oromia, Amhara and Southern Nations, Nationalities,<br />

and People’s Regional State (SNNPRS).<br />

PSNP Plus was based on a two-pronged, ‘Pull and Push’ approach. The ‘Pull’<br />

(demand) component - largely modelled on the BOAM programme - referred to the<br />

Adapting the value chain approach<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!