11.12.2012 Views

Pro-Poor Value Chain Development - Capacity.org

Pro-Poor Value Chain Development - Capacity.org

Pro-Poor Value Chain Development - Capacity.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58<br />

Pilot innovation projects<br />

The purpose of a BOAM pilot innovation project (or pilot) was to test an intervention<br />

with a view to upscaling proven practices. The point of departure for any pilot<br />

innovation project was the relevant Strategic Intervention Plan developed by<br />

each value chain coordinating group with a view to identifying constraints and<br />

opportunities for the further development of the chain. Any value chain actor with an<br />

innovative idea to solve a specific constraint or leverage a potential opportunity could<br />

submit a concept note to the executive committee of the coordinating group. For<br />

each concept that received a positive appraisal by the BOAM Executive Committee,<br />

a pilot innovation project development team was established to develop a proposal<br />

and to monitor the implementation of the project if it received a final go-ahead from<br />

the BOAM coordinator. The pilot innovation project development team was made up<br />

of the project proposer, a BOAM-appointed coach and possibly a service provider or<br />

researcher. The value chain lead adviser coordinated the implementation of the pilots<br />

and ensured that the learning objectives of each pilot were well understood by all<br />

involved. Table 3.2 provides an overview of pilot innovation projects as a proportion<br />

of all projects carried out within the different value chains.<br />

Table 3.2 Overview of BOAM-facilitated pilot innovation projects and their upscaling<br />

Sectors<br />

projects<br />

Business<br />

projects<br />

(2009)<br />

Upscaling<br />

business<br />

innovations<br />

Apiculture Dairy Oilseeds Fruits<br />

32 13 19 21<br />

30 15 15 15<br />

10 7 4 6<br />

2 1 6 1<br />

Knowledge exchanges<br />

The knowledge development processes supported by the BOAM programme, varied<br />

from one value chain to another. Nevertheless, the process followed as well as the<br />

outputs of each process might well be relevant for the other value chains as well. In<br />

order to prevent the emergence of knowledge ‘silos’ the BOAM learning coordinator<br />

<strong>org</strong>anised regular joint meetings for actors involved in the different pilot innovation<br />

projects to address emerging lessons on issues that concerned all value chains.<br />

BOAM used a number of tools to encourage systematic knowledge exchange, one<br />

of which was to <strong>org</strong>anise regular thematic exchanges. At one exchange a group of<br />

BOAM advisers involved in implementing pilot innovation projects explored different<br />

types of contract arrangements between value chain actors. The experiences of each<br />

value chain as well as relevant reference literature were shared and documented.<br />

Critical issues identified at the conference were taken up at a follow-up meeting and<br />

further elaborated by individual members. These issues included: the role of the<br />

government in contract arrangements between value chain actors; the importance<br />

of embedding inputs, technologies and other services in contract arrangements; the<br />

role of BOAM advisors in establishing and coaching contract arrangements; and the<br />

importance and options for producer groups in contract arrangements.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!