Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
16<br />
SAXONS, DANES, VIKINGS AND<br />
NORMANS<br />
The end of the Roman occupation of Britain was quite unlike our own recent colonial goodbyes.<br />
There was no lowering of the flag, no salute from a member of the imperial family, no tear brushed<br />
away from the eyes of the last governor and no dignified departure on a warship. That was Hong<br />
Kong in 1997, not Britain in the fifth century AD. The Romans left a country already accustomed to<br />
the intermittent attention of raiding war parties from across the porous land borders to the west and<br />
north. In the great attack of 367, Picts from Scotland had joined Saxons from across the North Sea<br />
in rampaging through the countryside, killing and looting at will. The final withdrawal of the<br />
Roman army, some fifty years later, left England completely undefended and the population<br />
unprotected. Four centuries of occupation, during which citizens and slaves alike were forbidden<br />
even to carry arms and all weapons and military equipment were in the hands of the army, had left<br />
a population unaccustomed to warfare. That is not to say that the population was necessarily<br />
completely defenceless. Everyone must have seen this coming, and there were unknown numbers of<br />
retired veterans living in the towns and countryside. There may even have been remnants of a<br />
command structure at York and around Hadrian’s Wall. The wall was not breached by the Picts,<br />
who must, therefore, have taken to the sea to attack the North Sea coasts in the great rising of 367.<br />
There were already Germanic settlements in eastern England based on former auxiliary units of the<br />
Roman army.<br />
It takes only a little imagination to see these men using even their small advantages to establish<br />
themselves as minor kings in the confusion. But what actually happened is shrouded in mystery for<br />
one very good reason. There are simply no contemporary records. Even allowing for their<br />
exaggerations and creative imagination, the histories of Tacitus and others were some sort of<br />
record. After AD 410 there is nothing. We have to wait over 100 years for the next account – and<br />
that makes Tacitus sound as reliable as the Encyclopaedia Britannica. The Ruin of Britain, written<br />
by the monk Gildas in about 540, which we encountered in an earlier chapter, is little more than an<br />
indignant rant against the corruption and godlessness of his own time. This is how he describes the<br />
incursions of the early fifth century:<br />
As the Romans went back home, there eagerly emerged from the coracles that had carried<br />
them across the sea valleys the foul hordes of Scots and Picts, like dark throngs of worms<br />
who wriggle out of narrow fissures in the rock.