11.06.2017 Views

New Scientist – June 10 2017

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NEWS & TECHNOLOGY<br />

Drug boosts<br />

self-confidence<br />

Helen Thomson<br />

LIFE is full of decisions, and it can<br />

be hard to know if you’re making<br />

the right one. But a drug that<br />

blocks the rush of noradrenaline<br />

through your body could boost<br />

your confidence, and lead to<br />

new treatments for obsessive<br />

compulsive disorder.<br />

How much we trust our<br />

decisions is governed by<br />

the process we use to assess<br />

our own behaviour, called<br />

metacognition. “We see many<br />

symptoms associated with poor<br />

metacognitive judgement in<br />

schizophrenia and OCD,” says<br />

Tobias Hauser at University<br />

College London. “In OCD, for<br />

instance, people may constantly<br />

go and check whether they’ve<br />

closed a door. They are poor at<br />

judging whether they have done<br />

something correctly or not.”<br />

Little is known about the neural<br />

underpinnings of metacognition,<br />

but it is likely to involve brain<br />

areas modulated by the chemicals<br />

dopamine and noradrenaline. So<br />

Hauser’s team asked 40 people to<br />

take a drug that blocks dopamine<br />

or noradrenaline either before or<br />

after a placebo. Another 20 people<br />

received two doses of the placebo.<br />

Eighty minutes after receiving<br />

their second treatment, the<br />

volunteers performed a task in<br />

which they had to decide whether<br />

the overall motion of a burst<br />

of randomly moving dots was<br />

directed to the left or right. They<br />

also indicated how confident<br />

they were in each judgement.<br />

Comparing self-assessed<br />

confidence against actual<br />

performance revealed that<br />

reducing noradrenaline boosts<br />

people’s metacognitive insight.<br />

The drug that does this, called<br />

propranolol, made volunteers<br />

more likely to accurately say<br />

whether their answer had been<br />

correct or wrong, without<br />

affecting the accuracy of their<br />

decisions (eLife, doi.org/f955nn).<br />

“This study is the first to<br />

show that metacognition can be<br />

selectively enhanced by drugs in<br />

the absence of differences in task<br />

performance,” says Steve Fleming<br />

at University College London,<br />

who wasn’t involved in the study.<br />

Hauser says noradrenaline is<br />

released when we unexpectedly<br />

encounter uncertainty, such<br />

as when we make an incorrect<br />

decision. “We think this burst of<br />

SUEDHANG/PLAINPICTURE<br />

noradrenaline when you make<br />

an error erases the information<br />

about a task that you recently<br />

stored in your memory.”<br />

This could mean that someone<br />

who has struggled to reach a<br />

decision may have their system<br />

reset, rendering them unable to<br />

draw on as much information to<br />

evaluate this decision. “You are no<br />

longer able to properly judge how<br />

well you did in the task because<br />

you’re judging your decision<br />

using less evidence,” says Hauser.<br />

<strong>–</strong>Sure you’re choosing the right one?<strong>–</strong><br />

Blocking noradrenaline seems<br />

to reduce this. Propranolol is<br />

used to treat high blood pressure,<br />

but it may also prove useful for<br />

some of the symptoms of OCD<br />

and schizophrenia.<br />

People without conditions<br />

like these may also benefit. “It is<br />

likely to have an effect in real-life<br />

decision-making. Whether you<br />

trust what you’re writing, whether<br />

you’re confident in what you’re<br />

saying <strong>–</strong> all our actions involve<br />

metacognition,” says Hauser. ■<br />

Huge methane<br />

blowout as the<br />

ice age ended<br />

CALL it the largest fart in Earth’s<br />

history. As the ice age came to a close<br />

12,000 years ago, retreating glaciers<br />

in the Barents Sea north of Norway<br />

triggered unprecedented blowouts of<br />

methane gas from massive dome-like<br />

features <strong>–</strong> pingos <strong>–</strong> on the seabed.<br />

Karin Andreassen at the Centre for<br />

Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and<br />

Climate at the Arctic University of<br />

Norway, and her colleagues, pieced<br />

together the story using detailed<br />

seismic and geologic data of the<br />

Barents seabed captured through<br />

high-resolution echo sounding<br />

from ships. They also looked at the<br />

composition of methane-containing<br />

gases still spewing up from the<br />

remains of <strong>10</strong>0 pingos.<br />

Analysis of the gas profiles<br />

revealed that the methane originated<br />

30,000 years ago from hydrocarboncontaining<br />

rock about a kilometre<br />

below the seabed. Thick layers of ice<br />

over the seabed kept any methane<br />

that percolated upwards trapped in<br />

the uppermost layer of sediment.<br />

Inside the sediment, the gas was<br />

converted into a solid ice-like mixture<br />

called a gas hydrate.<br />

Then, 17,000 to 15,000 years ago,<br />

the ice sheet began to retreat rapidly.<br />

The hydrates began to decompose,<br />

forming the kilometre-wide methane<br />

blisters, or pingos, on the seafloor,<br />

beneath a thin crust of remaining<br />

gas hydrate.<br />

“When the ice sheets<br />

melted the pingos burst,<br />

belching methane into<br />

the atmosphere”<br />

By 12,000 years ago, the ice<br />

sheets had melted and the pingos<br />

were exposed to warm water that<br />

weakened the remaining gas hydrates<br />

so much they burst, belching methane<br />

into the atmosphere (Science, DOI:<br />

<strong>10</strong>.1126/science.aal4500).<br />

The risks of something similar<br />

happening today are hard to predict.<br />

“Unless a glacier happens to cap<br />

a deep thermogenic [hydrocarbon]<br />

source, the lack of any carbon would<br />

preclude the formation of massive<br />

shallow hydrates,” says Patrick Crill at<br />

Stockholm University in Sweden. “So<br />

I’m not too worried.” Andy Coghlan ■<br />

12|<strong>New</strong><strong>Scientist</strong>|<strong>10</strong><strong>June</strong><strong>2017</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!