10.08.2017 Views

The sharing economy

New opportunities, new questions Global Investor, 02/2015 Credit Suisse

New opportunities, new questions
Global Investor, 02/2015
Credit Suisse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GLOBAL INVESTOR 2.15 — 54<br />

What kinds of tasks or activities are likely<br />

to be shared given increased online<br />

population, faster networks and so forth?<br />

Carl Benedikt Frey Work is being shared<br />

when transaction costs are low. In particular,<br />

work activities that can be delivered<br />

electronically over long distances with no<br />

big reduction in quality are most suitable for<br />

being shared as they can be undertaken<br />

from any remote location. Examples of such<br />

tasks include translation, market research<br />

and high-end science jobs. But many work<strong>sharing</strong><br />

platforms now also focus on personally<br />

delivered services. TaskRabbit, for<br />

example, offers services including cleaning<br />

someone’s house, building someone’s IKEA<br />

furniture or running someone’s errands.<br />

Difficulties tend to arise when a work task<br />

is difficult to define and when an activity<br />

cannot be divided into specific tasks. For<br />

example, work that requires complex physical<br />

interactions, such as collaborative science<br />

and other skilled teamwork, is difficult to<br />

share. But most other work is now suitable<br />

for delivery through online platforms.<br />

Your research focuses on automation. How<br />

is that likely to affect the <strong>sharing</strong> <strong>economy</strong>?<br />

Carl Benedikt Frey That is a good question.<br />

<strong>The</strong> relationship between automation<br />

and the <strong>sharing</strong> <strong>economy</strong> is not well understood.<br />

But arguably it is best analyzed<br />

through the lens of Ronald Coase’s theory<br />

of transaction cost economics, which says<br />

that the higher the costs of producing<br />

something internally, the better to replace<br />

employees with external contractors. Because<br />

automation drives down companies’<br />

costs of producing something internally, it<br />

may reduce the demand for work <strong>sharing</strong>.<br />

So in that way, automation may be bad<br />

news for the <strong>sharing</strong> <strong>economy</strong>?<br />

Carl Benedikt Frey Possibly, but at the<br />

same time digitalization has perhaps even<br />

more significantly cut costs for companies<br />

since it allows them to contract with workers<br />

abroad, often at cheap locations, to<br />

do very specific tasks. Entire supply chains<br />

have been reorganized around that.<br />

When a task is outsourced …<br />

Carl Benedikt Frey … it’s made more<br />

routine. And once something is routine, it<br />

also becomes increasingly automatable. So<br />

the <strong>sharing</strong> <strong>economy</strong> and all the data it<br />

generates about tasks people do may help<br />

drive automation. By the same token, while<br />

an Uber driver could be displaced by an<br />

autonomous vehicle, there are also cases<br />

in which outsourcing work may reduce<br />

“If one looks<br />

at the drivers<br />

of the <strong>sharing</strong><br />

<strong>economy</strong>,<br />

there are good<br />

reasons to<br />

believe that it<br />

will endure.”<br />

Carl Benedikt Frey<br />

Carl Benedikt Frey<br />

is Oxford Martin Citi Fellow and Co-<br />

Director of the Oxford Martin Programme<br />

on Technology at the University of<br />

Oxford. His research focuses on<br />

the transition of industrial nations to<br />

digital economies and challenges<br />

for economic growth, labor markets<br />

and urban development.<br />

incentives to automate in the sense that it<br />

drives down costs and makes automation<br />

less economically feasible.<br />

A blog post in the “Financial Times”<br />

suggested that the <strong>sharing</strong> <strong>economy</strong><br />

creates a “risk of digital serfdom.” Are we<br />

reinventing feudalism?<br />

Carl Benedikt Frey Feudalism was a<br />

system in which people worked and fought<br />

for nobles who gave them protection and<br />

the right to use land in return. <strong>The</strong> <strong>sharing</strong><br />

<strong>economy</strong>, by contrast, contains few obligations,<br />

but also little protection. So it’s quite<br />

the opposite of feudalism. At the end of<br />

the day, how workers will fare as a result of<br />

the <strong>sharing</strong> <strong>economy</strong> depends on how governments<br />

respond. <strong>The</strong>y need to maximize<br />

the benefits for consumers, while mitigating<br />

the risks for workers. One way of doing<br />

so would be to create a national e-market.<br />

A national e-market?<br />

Carl Benedikt Frey We live in an era<br />

of big data, but much of its potential is not<br />

being realized. Right now, if I want to do<br />

some work, I can turn to TaskRabbit or<br />

Upwork or Mechanical Turk. If I want to rent<br />

an apartment, I go on Airbnb. If I want to<br />

share a car, I go to RelayRides. But they are<br />

separate platforms. Say I’m sitting in my<br />

apartment at four o’clock on Tuesday afternoon,<br />

and I desperately want to make some<br />

extra income. It would help to have a central<br />

platform that tells me these are jobs that<br />

you can do within this neighborhood, these<br />

are the types of skills you would need to do<br />

all these different types of jobs, this is what<br />

they would pay, and to do this, you would<br />

need this certificate: you can get that here.<br />

National e-markets would also give policymakers<br />

better access to relevant information<br />

to monitor trends in the labor market.<br />

Is the <strong>sharing</strong> <strong>economy</strong> here to stay?<br />

Carl Benedikt Frey If one looks at the<br />

drivers of the <strong>sharing</strong> <strong>economy</strong>, there are<br />

good reasons to believe that it will endure.<br />

Wage inequality is likely to increase further<br />

in coming decades, and people on low<br />

incomes will want access to even cheaper<br />

goods and services. People are also seemingly<br />

becoming more concerned about<br />

climate change. Through digitalization and<br />

globalization we are becoming more connected,<br />

and work can be shared across<br />

the globe more easily. So I see no sign of<br />

this slowing down, although there will<br />

no doubt be regulatory pressure in some<br />

domains. But how that plays out is very<br />

difficult to predict.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!