16.10.2017 Views

Maintworld 3/2017

In this issue: Using Technology and Innovation to Manage Mega-Maintenance Challenges Identify the Root Cause of a Misalignment Condition Elements of a Good Preventive Maintenance Program

In this issue:
Using Technology and Innovation to Manage Mega-Maintenance Challenges
Identify the Root Cause of a Misalignment Condition
Elements of a Good Preventive Maintenance Program

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONDITION MONITORING<br />

measured, but we will not be dealing<br />

with them. They typically need many<br />

more measurement points than the<br />

five points that will be enough for our<br />

measurement. The machine has four<br />

roller bearings and we should select four<br />

measuring points as close as possible to<br />

these bearings. These four points must<br />

be radial, i.e. perpendicular to the shaft.<br />

Do not worry about whether to measure<br />

vertically or horizontally. You can<br />

choose any direction between these two<br />

directions. The last fifth point will be axial,<br />

i.e. parallel to the shaft. Put it on the<br />

coupling and it doesn’t matter whether<br />

it is on the engine or the fan. This fifth<br />

point is therefore perpendicular to the<br />

previous four.<br />

approximately +/- 5%. If the same test is<br />

carried out without a pad, the results will<br />

vary by +/- 50%. (See Figure 1)<br />

We deliberately did not mention<br />

measuring with a sensor that has no<br />

magnetic base, and that is just pushed<br />

onto the machine by hand. This method<br />

is unrepeatable. Unfortunately, it is<br />

sometimes used in maintenance and<br />

so the results are disappointing. Sometimes<br />

the whole vibration diagnostics<br />

programme is rejected, the only reason<br />

being unprepared measuring points.<br />

THE USUAL OPINION<br />

AMONG MAINTENANCE<br />

PEOPLE IS THAT A<br />

POWERFUL ANALYZER<br />

IS NEEDED FOR A REAL<br />

DIAGNOSIS; THIS IS A<br />

MYTH. IN MY OPINION<br />

EVEN WITH A SIMPLE<br />

VIBROMETER, 90 PERCENT<br />

OF DEFECTS CAN BE<br />

ACCURATELY DETERMINED.<br />

Once the measuring points have been<br />

chosen, they need to be prepared for<br />

the measurement. It is not possible to<br />

simply take the sensor with a magnetic<br />

base and put it on the uneven surface of<br />

the machine. Measuring pads must be<br />

stuck on the selected locations before<br />

measurements are taken. They have a<br />

flat surface. In addition, they guarantee<br />

that you will always measure at the same<br />

machine location. The basic rule for taking<br />

measurements is to make sure the<br />

measurement conditions are 100 percent<br />

repeatable. That is exactly what the<br />

measuring pads guarantee. Let’s try, for<br />

example, 10 repeated measurements in<br />

one place i.e. put the sensor on the pad,<br />

measure it and then remove it from the<br />

pad. You will find that the measurements<br />

are almost identical. They will vary by<br />

Figure 1. Measurement pad glued onto the<br />

machine surface (1), magnetic base (2),<br />

acceleration sensor (3).<br />

How to Find Warning and<br />

Alert Vibration Levels<br />

The first measurement has already been<br />

taken and the results obtained. But what<br />

do the numbers mean? Are the vibration<br />

readings low or high? With what should<br />

the results be compared? The easiest<br />

way is to use ISO 10816, but the limits<br />

given here have one significant defect.<br />

They apply to machines with speeds of<br />

600-3000 RPM. Let’s suppose the fan is<br />

unbalanced. The centrifugal force that<br />

causes vibration will vary significantly<br />

for 600 RPM and 3000 RPM. The dependence<br />

of the force on the speed is<br />

quadratic, i.e. 2x higher speed means 4x<br />

higher force. Therefore, the weight of<br />

the heavy point on the rotor may not create<br />

a problem at 600 RPM but will cause<br />

the fan to destruct at 3000 RPM. The<br />

warning and danger limit values should<br />

depend on the speed. (See Figure 2)<br />

If several similar machines are<br />

measured, then the situation is simpler<br />

because we can compare the values from<br />

all machines. If we get results equal to<br />

1.8, 2.1, 1.9 and 4.5 from the same point,<br />

then it is obvious that 2.0 means good<br />

machine condition. A machine condition<br />

with a value of 4.5 should be investigated<br />

further.<br />

The first step deals with regular<br />

measurements and monitoring the<br />

3/<strong>2017</strong> maintworld 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!