Maintworld 3/2017

More documents

Info

BENCHMARKING Benchmark among similar companies In quantitative benchmarking methods, the basic assumption is that the companies are similar enough to be compared if they operate in the same industrial branch. In real life, the diversity of the companies can be extensive and poses a major drawback. If the benchmarked companies differ too much from each other, the benchmarked company is barely able to find the right development targets or even recognize the companies that should be a valid reference group. With the proposed approach based on categorizing sites to comparable units and benchmarking them against each other, the best practices will depend on the business environment. Thus, the first step is to recognize similar kinds of companies that can best learn from each other. In this context, similarity means that companies are comparable according to the aspects affecting asset performance and asset management practices. As the focus is in the development of maintenance service offerings, the benchmarking method categorizes sites or plants according to their maintenance environment. ”A maintenance environment” collects together the data arising from those sites that are similar enough with respect to external aspects affecting maintenance activities as illustrated in Figure 3. Maintenance environments describe features that affect the requirements for the maintenance function and include maintenance policy and maintenance activities. Features describing a maintenance environment include for example: availability of competent employees, climate effect on maintenance conduction, life cycle phase of equipment, maintainability of equipment, etc. From a service provider’s point of view these aspects are external and cannot be controlled by a service provider. Data collection The benchmarking method requires a quantitative data set that contains variables about the maintenance environment, applied maintenance practices and level of success. CMMS or other databases seldom contain such statistical data that is relevant from the benchmarking point of view. Thus, part of the method development was to establish a questionnaire for the data collection. Figure 1. Example of data collection questionnaire The questionnaire includes 34 questions that help to categorize the sites to different maintenance environments, recognize maintenance practices and calculate a key performance indicator to assess the successfulness of a site (see Figure 1). The service provider carries out the data collection in normal business negotiation situations. For this reason, the length of the questionnaire has to be reasonable and the questions should be easy to answer. The number of the questions is as small as possible and whenever possible the questionnaire offers ready alternatives. Pre-defined answer alternatives also support automated data analysis that allow discussion about results immediately after entering the data items. Figure 2. Main phases of benchmarking Figure 3. User interfaces of the benchmarking tool, which allow data collection and data analysis in a meeting with a customer Developing targets based on benchmarking Benchmarking is a tool to find out potentially weak points in the operation and offers an input for detailed discussion, and planning and prioritizing for development actions. In the developed benchmarking method a site under study is, based on the questionnaire entries, categorized to one of the pre-defined maintenance environments according to its similarity index value. The similarity index indicates the closeness of the site’s answers to the profile of a pre-defined environment. As illustrated in Figure 2, all sites belonging to the same maintenance environment are extracted from the benchmarking database for further analysis. The best sites of a particular 36 maintworld 3/<strong>2017</strong>
BENCHMARKING maintenance environment are defined according to the values of key performance indicators, like availability or maintenance cost divided by equipment replacement value. Comparing maintenance practices between the benchmarked site and the best sites points out the differences in maintenance practices applied in operation and management. Investigating reasons and effects of these differences can reveal targets for development actions of the benchmarked site. Benefits from a service provider point of view Outotec Service Business Development is a function that has been actively looking for new ways of providing value to the customer. By developing the benchmarking concept in cooperation with different departments within the company as well as with certain customer sites, the development team has been able to structure the data gathering process. Moreover, it is able to better utilize installed base knowledge as well as understanding about the potential value sources for the customer, on a very concrete level. The benchmarking tool presented in Figure 3 can be used as a sales tool for the services business for an entire site or for sub-processes or process islands. It allows a value-based sales process, and more specifically, the matching of Outotec’s service offering against the customer’s actual needs, as defined on a detailed site assessment. It allows a transparent sales process, which can be defined in close cooperation with the customer. Outotec will be able to use the tool and its results also in internal product development, since it will become more aware of the customers’ key challenges. Addressing the service product portfolio accordingly will give Outotec insight to what type of services the customers value the most. Summary There is a need for a systematic assessment framework for concretizing value, benchmarking it and ultimately optimizing the offered service solutions. The benchmarking method and tool helps to compare different sites according to their operational and maintenance environments. The benchmarking tool helps to identify and visualize the potential sources of value. With this approach based on categorizing sites to comparable units and benchmarking them against each other, the service provider is able to improve its capability in: • Showing improvement potential in asset management and make recommendations of applicable asset management policies, • Facilitating sales by optimizing the customer-specific product and service offering, and • Concretising customer value of the service provision. REFERENCES Komonen, Kari; Kunttu, Susanna; Ahonen, Toni (2011). In search of the Best Practices in Maintenance - New Methods and Research Results. Handbook 1 st International <strong>Maintworld</strong> Congress. Helsinki, 22-23.3.2011. KP-media Oy. Helsinki 2011, pp. 166-177. Valkokari, Pasi; Ahonen, Toni; Kunttu, Susanna; Horn, Susanna (2016). Fleet service solutions for optimal impact (in Finnish). Promaint – kunnossapidon erikoislehti. Kunnossapitoyhdistys Promaint ry, 30(1), pp. 36-39. The patented B.A.T. Belt Alignment Tool is the fastest and easiest belt alignment system available. Get accurate error free belt alignment in one fast and easy tool. WWW.BELTALIGNMENTTOOL.COM sales@beltalignmenttool.com 800-887-5890
Page 1 and 2: 3/2017 www.maintworld.com maintenan
Page 3 and 4: FLEXIBLE PROGRAMS Tailor a program
Page 5 and 6: IN THIS ISSUE 3/2017 42 Backlog man
Page 7 and 8: TECHNOLOGY BEFORE STARTING, it is i
Page 9 and 10: APM Solutions to Keep You on Target
Page 11 and 12: LEADERSHIP BILL LEAHY, RMIC, Senior
Page 13 and 14: Why gamble with Reliability educati
Page 15 and 16: CONDITION MONITORING every six mont
Page 18 and 19: CONDITION MONITORING Enjoy Success
Page 20 and 21: CONDITION MONITORING Figure 2. vibr
Page 22 and 23: INDUSTRIAL INTERNET IIoT Simplifies
Page 24 and 25: LUBRICATION Bearing Grease Replenis
Page 26 and 27: Road Map to Operational Readiness a
Page 28 and 29: ASSET MANAGEMENT Using Technology a
Page 30 and 31: ASSET MANAGEMENT we have expedited
Page 32 and 33: MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT Elements of
Page 34: BENCHMARKING Demonstrating Value wi
Page 39 and 40: Successful reliability programs hav
Page 41 and 42: RELIABILITY is a win-win, change wi
Page 43 and 44: ASSET MANAGEMENT man-hours held in
Page 45 and 46: 3/2017 maintworld x
Page 47 and 48: 28. International Exhibition for El
Page 49 and 50: CONDITION MONITORING PEAK VALUE MET
Page 51 and 52: Master the Language of Your Machine

Maintworld 3/2017

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?