04.01.2018 Views

280 January 2018 - Gryffe Advertizer

The Advertizer - Your local community magazine to the Gryffe area.

The Advertizer - Your local community magazine to the Gryffe area.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

january <strong>2018</strong><br />

Help us keep you & the<br />

local area moving this<br />

winter.<br />

Follow us on facebook &<br />

twitter @<strong>Gryffe</strong>Roadwatch<br />

and if you spot or know of any road<br />

works, fl ooding, ice or blockages let<br />

us know!<br />

You can send us a message via<br />

facebook or twitter or post a wee<br />

comment on <strong>Gryffe</strong> Roadwatch or<br />

The <strong>Advertizer</strong>’s page.<br />

51<br />

Possible return of the train<br />

Two momentous events have<br />

occurred within the last three<br />

weeks which greatly enhance<br />

the prospect of the return of<br />

the railway to the <strong>Gryffe</strong> Valley<br />

-- a campaign we have been<br />

fighting for over many years,<br />

recognising of course that the<br />

interests of present day “cycle<br />

track” users must now be accommodated.<br />

The fi rst of these is the Scottish Government’s (through their Planning<br />

and Environment Appeals Tribunal) refusal to allow development to go<br />

ahead at the “WhiteLint Gate” site at the eastern end of Bridge of Weir.<br />

This, if passed, would have allowed the developer to “ride rough-shod”<br />

over long established rights to maintain the integrity of the railway trackbed,<br />

rights which had been established following a previous unsuccessful<br />

Planning Application by Bellway Homes to build on the trackbed at the old<br />

Bridge of Weir station in 2001/2.<br />

The second momentous event, perhaps less obviously relevant to the<br />

<strong>Gryffe</strong> Valley railway’s future, is the Scottish Government’s rejection of<br />

Renfrewshire Council’s proposal for an Airport Rail Link entering the<br />

Airport from the western end using a “tram-train” system. This scheme<br />

had been proposing to use a large slice of the “Greater Glasgow City deal”<br />

money, awarded by the governments to promote “transport infrastructure”<br />

improvements within Renfrewshire, yet nothing whatsoever had been<br />

apportioned to overcome the totally inadequate transport infrastructure<br />

conditions (both road and rail) within the rural Renfrewshire hinterland.<br />

We are not against giving a high priority to a Glasgow Airport rail link, but<br />

if the alternative one we have in mind were to be adopted, it would take a<br />

logical direct route, branching off the main line at Arkleston and entering<br />

the Airport from the east, with a “through” station at an elevated level within<br />

the concourse, allowing the line to be extended later, if not immediately,<br />

over the M8 at its narrowest (west of the St James Interchange) and<br />

continuing on along the north side of the A737 to serve Linwood and join<br />

up with the original route of the <strong>Gryffe</strong> Valley Line.<br />

The advantage to the people of <strong>Gryffe</strong> of such a scheme would be<br />

enormous, allowing not only rapid and direct access to the centres of<br />

Paisley and Glasgow, but also to the Airport (as a place of work as well<br />

as a fl ight “jumping off” point). We recognise that an essential part of any<br />

such railway system would be to provide “park and ride” facilities at many<br />

of the stations for those many who would still have to start and finish their<br />

journeys by car or local bus.<br />

Our group has many interested and like-minded people behind us, so why<br />

not give us your opinion and hopefully also lend us your support. We will<br />

be canvassing for contact details at the various community centres in the<br />

area in the next few weeks.<br />

Brian Turner, on behalf of The <strong>Gryffe</strong> Valley Transport Forum.<br />

Deafhillock Roundabout<br />

Roadworks Amnesty<br />

Local communities and commerce may be temporarily relieved to hear of<br />

Renfrewshire Council’s decision to suspend all future planned roadworks<br />

around Deafhillock Roundabout until late spring <strong>2018</strong>. Commenting on<br />

this decision local Councillor Jim Sheridan said, “All three major parties<br />

recognised the frustrations of the local residents and businesses, trying<br />

to go about their everyday lives in these challenging circumstances.<br />

Therefore this decision is welcomed to allow future necessary roadworks<br />

to be planned in a way that recognises previous mistakes and learns<br />

from them. Planning for this development got off to a bad start and<br />

gradually got worse. People recognise and accept that maintaining and<br />

constructing new roads causes delays, but they quite rightly expect all<br />

those involved to work together in a professional way, including utilities<br />

to limit delays to the public.<br />

Parking Discs to<br />

cease in New Year<br />

Inverclyde’s Environment and Regeneration<br />

Committee has unanimously agreed to cease<br />

parking discs in Kilmacolm. This followed a public<br />

hearing on 31st August to hear the arguments of an objector.<br />

Councillor David Wilson told the <strong>Advertizer</strong>, “At full Council on 30th<br />

November the cessation was again unanimously agreed. There needs<br />

to be a further 6 weeks, in case of a legal challenge, before discs go.<br />

This will be towards the end of <strong>January</strong>. I thank my colleague Councillor<br />

McCabe for his support in this matter. I would point out that the 2 hour<br />

limit will remain in force. The village traders did not want the disc system.<br />

47% of all tickets were for disc offences, often visitors.”<br />

@<strong>Gryffe</strong>Ads www.advertizer.co.uk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!