14.12.2012 Views

Remediation of PAH-Contaminated Soils and Sediments: A ...

Remediation of PAH-Contaminated Soils and Sediments: A ...

Remediation of PAH-Contaminated Soils and Sediments: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bioavailability Analytical Methods<br />

Sites contaminated with <strong>PAH</strong>s can be evaluated using several different<br />

measurements: total extraction, mild organic extraction to assess desorbable<br />

fractions, <strong>and</strong> bioassays (assessments <strong>of</strong> bioavailability by uptake <strong>and</strong>/or toxicity<br />

to microorganisms). Although there are a range <strong>of</strong> bioassays available to assess<br />

<strong>PAH</strong> availability, they are time-consuming <strong>and</strong> can be expensive. An alternative<br />

is to use rapid, reproducible chemical tests to assess bioavailability.<br />

Although total extractable <strong>PAH</strong> levels are routinely used to assess <strong>of</strong><br />

contaminated sites, they will grossly overestimate bioavailable <strong>PAH</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

cannot be used to assess or predict the fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>PAH</strong>s that is accessible to<br />

biota (Alex<strong>and</strong>er, 2000; Semple et al., 2003). Different researchers have<br />

proposed several mild organic/aqueous extraction procedures to assess the<br />

readily available <strong>PAH</strong> fraction in soil <strong>and</strong> sediments. Some <strong>of</strong> these extraction<br />

procedures include:<br />

� Extraction with n-butanol: Kelsey et al. (1997) reported that availability <strong>of</strong><br />

phenanthrene to bacteria <strong>and</strong> earthworms could be accurately predicted<br />

with n-butanol extraction. Liste <strong>and</strong> Alex<strong>and</strong>er (2002) also found good<br />

correlation between butanol extraction <strong>and</strong> <strong>PAH</strong> availability to earthworms.<br />

Bogan <strong>and</strong> Sullivan (2003) found that the n-butanol extractability <strong>of</strong> 13<br />

<strong>PAH</strong> compounds was dependent on soil organic matter content.<br />

� Triton X-100 shake: Cuypers (2001) found extraction with Triton X-100<br />

overpredicted <strong>PAH</strong> availability.<br />

� Solid phase extraction with Tenax beads: In this method, Tenax A (a<br />

porous polymer <strong>of</strong> 2,6-diphenyl-p-phenylene-oxide) removes the rapidly<br />

desorbing fraction that is equivalent to bioavailable <strong>PAH</strong> (Uyttebroek et al.,<br />

2007). Cuypers (2001) found extraction with Tenax A to correlate well with<br />

bioavailable <strong>PAH</strong>.<br />

� Aqueous β cyclodextrin shake: Reid et al. (2000b) proposed β<br />

cyclodextrin aqueous solution extraction to predict availability, <strong>and</strong> found<br />

that this solution predicted the amount <strong>of</strong> phenanthrene available to<br />

bacteria. Both Cuypers (2001) <strong>and</strong> Allan et al. (2006) found extraction with<br />

β Cyclodextrin to correlate well with bioavailable <strong>PAH</strong>s. Papadopolous et<br />

al. (2007) compared aqueous cyclodextrin extraction to mineralization <strong>of</strong><br />

phenanthrene in 4 different soils with different organic matter content<br />

ranging from 4.8 to 27 %. High correlation was found between cyclodextrin<br />

extractability <strong>and</strong> microbial mineralization <strong>of</strong> phenanthrene by indigenous<br />

bacteria.<br />

However, no one chemical test predicts the availability <strong>of</strong> all <strong>PAH</strong> contaminants<br />

to different organisms in all soils. Thus, these tests are better used along with<br />

bioassays to assess <strong>PAH</strong> bioavailability in soils (Stokes et al., 2006).<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!