14.02.2018 Views

DESIGNING TERRITORIAL METABOLISM

978-3-86859-489-8 https://www.jovis.de/de/buecher/product/designing_territorial_metabolism.html

978-3-86859-489-8
https://www.jovis.de/de/buecher/product/designing_territorial_metabolism.html

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

235<br />

CAR (RE)CYCLE IN BUDA<br />

Davide Cauciello, Studio Geoffrey Grulois, and Nadia Casabella (ULB)<br />

BUDA AREA—GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />

The old industrial territory of Buda is undergoing an important process of<br />

regeneration. The economic importance of Buda derives from its situation at the<br />

juncture between Brussels and Vilvoorde and next to large-scale transportation infrastructure—the<br />

canal to Antwerp and the highway. Buda is an exchange platform<br />

between Flanders and Brussels and, on a bigger scale, between Europe and Belgium.<br />

The territory is clearly delimitated by transportation lines: railways, roadways<br />

and waterways give Buda clear boundaries but also set many limits. In terms of land<br />

use, the old industrial urban fabric has given way to several controversial largescale<br />

projects: UPlace Mall, Bpost Mass Center, and Roll-On/Roll-Off Terminal along<br />

the canal. The industrial mono-functionalism of Buda has led to a lack of pu blic<br />

spaces and programmatic diversity.<br />

URBANITY THROUGH THE VOID<br />

“If a place can be defined as relational, historical, and concerned with identity,<br />

then a space that cannot be defined as relational, or histo rical, or concerned with<br />

identity will be a non-place” (Augé, 1992).<br />

Within the industrial urban fabric of Buda, the main function of the streets<br />

is to connect companies. The space between these companies allows functional<br />

requirements to be met but generates functional tensions and a lack of interfaces<br />

for the public.<br />

These lines of tension between public and private are not currently generating<br />

urbanity or interactions. They are mostly materialized by a fence that defines<br />

the limit between the public space—the street—and a huge empty private space<br />

dedicated to storage and to loading trucks.<br />

Furthermore, some vacant buildings offer serious opportunities to diversify<br />

activities into a generic industrial urban fabric.<br />

VISION FOR URBAN REGENERATION<br />

Our main intention is to decrease territorial mono-functionalism and to<br />

diversify activities. The lack of public space and public facilities in this “market<br />

economy” (Johnson, 2005) model of a “city” generates a lack of urbanity typical of an<br />

industrial territory in transition. The proposal to upgrade the former industrial urban<br />

fabric suggests that activities be diversified and integrated into several strategic<br />

installations and facilities. Manufacturing industries, sport facilities, cultural installations,<br />

and public spaces are some examples of uses we can think of. By bringing<br />

these activities together, we could develop a new urban complexity and supersede<br />

the mono-functional land use.<br />

Workers and residents of Buda, two opposite but still complementary flows,<br />

could converge into these integrated facilities.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!