01.05.2018 Views

The-Accountant-Jul-Aug-2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Governance<br />

auditor should discuss the matters with<br />

management first at initial stages in order<br />

to clarify facts and issues, and to give<br />

management an opportunity to provide<br />

further information and explanations.<br />

An article entitled ACCA Think Ahead;<br />

indicates that when considering the<br />

reporting outputs of an audit of historical<br />

financial information, attention is usually<br />

focused on the audit opinion issued by<br />

auditors to shareholders in case of limited<br />

companies. However, it further indicates<br />

that another great output produced in<br />

the auditors’ report is the aspect of the<br />

auditor’s communication to those charged<br />

with governance.<br />

In order to make the communication<br />

work well, it will be important to<br />

understand to whom the communication<br />

should be directed to although the<br />

Auditing standards do not specify the<br />

actual person(s) the communication<br />

should be directed. But to my<br />

understanding, it should be directed<br />

to persons entrusted with supervision,<br />

control and direction of the entity<br />

(Governance) often called the accounting<br />

officers in the public sector in Kenya as<br />

those charged with governance ordinarily<br />

are accountable for ensuring that the<br />

entity achieves its objectives, with regard<br />

to reliability, effectiveness and efficiency<br />

of operations compliance with applicable<br />

laws. However, the appropriate person(s)<br />

to be communicated may vary depending<br />

on the matter to be communicated.<br />

It should be understood that audit<br />

matters of governance include only those<br />

matters that have come to the attention<br />

of the auditors as a result of performing<br />

their audit function and should be<br />

communicated on timely basis in order to<br />

enable those charged with governance to<br />

take appropriate action. <strong>The</strong> auditor must<br />

communicate with those charged with<br />

governance, matters related to the financial<br />

statement audit that are, in the auditor’s<br />

professional judgment, significant<br />

and relevant in terms responsibilities<br />

of those charged with governance in<br />

overseeing the financial reporting process.<br />

However, certain aspects like legal<br />

requirements depending on the legal<br />

structure existing in a given country may<br />

require that communication of matters<br />

to those charged with governance be<br />

communicated to legal entities and this<br />

matters may include ; fraud, illegal acts,<br />

improprieties in procurement process,<br />

violation of contracts or agreements and<br />

other illegal acts.<br />

Auditors should communicate matters<br />

relating to;<br />

• Auditor’s responsibilities under generally<br />

accepted auditing standards.<br />

• An overview of the audit planning, scope<br />

and timing of audit.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> audit of the financial statements does<br />

not relieve management or those charged<br />

with governance of their responsibilities.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> auditors are responsible for<br />

forming and expressing an opinion about<br />

whether the financial statements that<br />

have been prepared by management are<br />

presented fairly, in all material respects,<br />

in conformity with Generally Acceptable<br />

Accounting Standards (GAAPS).<br />

• <strong>The</strong> relationships that may bear on the<br />

auditor’s independence and objectivity,<br />

audit findings from the audit including<br />

the auditors’ views on the qualitative<br />

aspects of the entity’s accounting and<br />

reporting.<br />

• Concept of materiality and its<br />

application to the audit approach.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> way auditors propose to address<br />

the risk of material misstatements, with<br />

particular reference to areas of high risk.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> auditors’ approach to the assessment<br />

of, and reliance on, internal controls.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> extent, if any, to which reliance<br />

should be placed on the work of internal<br />

audit and on the best way internal and<br />

external auditors can work best on a<br />

constructive and complementary basis.<br />

• Expected modifications to the auditors’<br />

report in order to ensure that those<br />

charged with governance are aware of the<br />

proposed modifications and the reasons<br />

for it before the report is finalized. Those<br />

charged with governance mandate have<br />

an opportunity, where appropriate, to<br />

provide auditors with further information<br />

and explanations in respect to matter(s)<br />

giving rise to the proposed modification.<br />

This also helps ensure that no disrupted<br />

facts in respect of the matter(s) giving rise<br />

to the proposed modification or matters<br />

of disagreements are confirmed as such.<br />

• Unadjusted misstatements detected<br />

by the auditors. When misstatements<br />

identified by the auditors are not adjusted<br />

by the entity’s management the auditors<br />

communicate all such unadjusted<br />

misstatements. In case of refusal to make<br />

further adjustments by those charged<br />

with governance, the auditors’ should still<br />

explain the reasons for, and appropriateness<br />

of, not making those adjustments<br />

having regard to both qualitative and<br />

JULY - AUGUST <strong>2017</strong> 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!