06.08.2018 Views

Law for The Poor

Law for The Poor

Law for The Poor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2388<br />

FORDHAM LAW REVIEW<br />

[Vol. 78<br />

minimum goal per attorney. Of those, twelve listed sixty hours and fifteen<br />

listed fifty hours. Of the remaining firms that reported goals, one was<br />

higher than sixty hours and eight were less than fifty. 1 28 Of course, setting<br />

benchmarks does not ensure that they will be met, and we do not have<br />

figures on how many firms succeeded.<br />

A crucial factor in determining per<strong>for</strong>mance is how firms treat pro bono<br />

hours relative to billable hours-and how unpaid work affects<br />

compensation and promotion decisions. Table 6 shows how firms that<br />

responded to our survey counted pro bono activity <strong>for</strong> different types of<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance decisions.<br />

Table 6: Counting Pro Bono Hours (N=56)<br />

% of All<br />

Count Toward:<br />

Respondents<br />

Minimum billable hour 70%<br />

requirements<br />

Lockstep compensation 30%<br />

awards<br />

Bonus determinations 77%<br />

Partnership draws 13%<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance reviews 82%<br />

In over four-fifths of firms (n=46), pro bono activity figured in<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance reviews, and in over three-quarters (n=43) it counted toward<br />

bonus determinations. By contrast, very few reported that pro bono<br />

mattered in calculating partnership draws and not even one-third counted<br />

pro bono toward associate lockstep compensation (n=17). Seventy percent<br />

of the firms (n=39) indicated that they counted at least some hours toward<br />

minimum billable hour requirements. Of those that provided in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

about the number of hours, a third (six of eighteen firms) stated that all pro<br />

bono hours counted; another third (seven of eighteen firms) capped hours at<br />

various points (four capped at fifty hours, one at sixty, one at one hundred,<br />

and one at two hundred). Two firms imposed a limit with discretion to<br />

exceed it upon firm approval and one counted only pro bono hours over one<br />

hundred toward billable hours. <strong>The</strong> remaining two firms had vague<br />

standards. One counted a "certain number" without specifying how<br />

128. Our survey also asked the firms if they set pro bono participation goals. Forty<br />

percent (n=22) indicated that they set goals <strong>for</strong> the percentage of firm attorneys who do pro<br />

bono work. Of those, eight had a goal of one hundred percent participation, another six<br />

chose between seventy and eighty percent, one put the goal at sixty-five percent, another at a<br />

"majority," and the final firm stated, "We aim <strong>for</strong> at least 40% of our attorneys hitting the<br />

50-hour standard--that's the goal set by the D.C. Circuit's Standing Committee on Pro<br />

Bono" (Survey Respondent 52).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!