17.12.2012 Views

I. Table of Contents - ISS

I. Table of Contents - ISS

I. Table of Contents - ISS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tatiana\Bank Book\Public Bank Book\FINAL <strong>ISS</strong> PUBLIC Bank IM - Press Release to EMTN_1.doc 9 Nov 2005 10:32 77/91<br />

77<br />

Historical Financial Information<br />

100% in recent years. However, this reduction in working capital requirements is to some extent <strong>of</strong>fset<br />

by the growth <strong>of</strong> the Company in Continental European and International markets where average<br />

receivable days are typically less favourable than in Northern Europe. In September 2005 average<br />

receivable days were 62 days in Continental Europe, while in Northern Europe the average receivable<br />

days were 32 days. When comparing September 2005 average receivable days <strong>of</strong> individual countries<br />

within Europe the range varies from 16 days in Finland to 94 days in Italy.<br />

Figure 21: Development in Receivable Days Outstanding, 2000-2004<br />

Note:<br />

Receivables Days Outstanding<br />

45<br />

49<br />

47<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

(1) Defined as (Accounts Receivable) divided by ((Revenue for the total number <strong>of</strong> months plus VAT) divided by 30 days)<br />

Source: <strong>ISS</strong><br />

E. Seasonality<br />

The demand for traditional facility services is generally stable and there appears to be limited<br />

seasonality in the quarterly revenue development over the historical period. However, some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

services <strong>ISS</strong> provides experience seasonality. In particular, demand for the landscaping and pest<br />

control services <strong>of</strong> property services segment are significantly higher in the summer months than in<br />

the fall and winter, which may cause Revenues to be higher in the second and third quarter <strong>of</strong> the year<br />

and lower in the first and fourth quarters. However, given the impact by the timing <strong>of</strong> acquisitions in<br />

particular 2000 and 2001, makes it very difficult to compare quarterly revenue development, hence no<br />

direct conclusions can be drawn.<br />

Figure 22: <strong>ISS</strong> Revenues, 2001-Q3 2005, by Quarter<br />

DKK million<br />

25,000<br />

20,000<br />

15,000<br />

10,000<br />

Source: <strong>ISS</strong><br />

5,000<br />

0<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4<br />

8,153<br />

8,559<br />

8,804<br />

9,336<br />

9,300<br />

9,683<br />

9,521<br />

9,480<br />

8,917<br />

9,013<br />

8,931<br />

9,304<br />

45<br />

9,244<br />

9,743<br />

10,411<br />

10,957<br />

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05<br />

10,845<br />

44<br />

11,677<br />

11,635

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!