You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Read more at:<br />
mswa.org.au/researchupdate<br />
From the Barts Blog.<br />
EBV in the brain<br />
Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) is a herpes virus spread by saliva and<br />
infects around 95% of us during our lifetimes. In many people<br />
EBV infection does not cause prominent symptoms – it may<br />
cause a ‘flu-like’ illness which gets better on its own, or it<br />
may go completely unnoticed.<br />
Some people infected with EBV experience the more severe<br />
illness – glandular fever or infectious mononucleosis – with<br />
fatigue, sore throat, enlarged lymph nodes, fevers, and a mild<br />
hepatitis (liver inflammation).<br />
There is lots of evidence to suggest a link between EBV<br />
infection and the risk of developing MS:<br />
• PwMS have high levels of antibodies, suggesting a specific<br />
immune response against EBV<br />
• Slightly higher rates of EBV infection in pwMS; 100% of<br />
pwMS are infected vs 95% of the general population<br />
• Increased risk of developing MS after glandular fever; 2.5x<br />
more likely<br />
• The detection of EBV infection in the brains of pwMS<br />
The hypothesis that EBV infection is an important step<br />
in developing MS makes sense. We know EBV evades the<br />
immune system by infecting B cells, driving them towards<br />
dormancy, and then promoting their long-term survival.<br />
EBV has an ingenious arsenal of tricks to promote its own<br />
survival by fashioning a long-term niche for itself inside B<br />
cells. This dormant period is termed ‘latent EBV infection.’<br />
A minority of EBV-infected cells will enter the ‘lytic phase’ of<br />
infection, in which the virus rapidly replicates, kills the host<br />
cells, and is shed to infect other cells. Recent data suggests<br />
that B cells are key drivers of the disease, any factor which<br />
promotes survival of B cells and hijacks the normal pathways<br />
of B cell maturation could conceivably predispose people to<br />
developing the disease.<br />
Whether EBV is present in the brains of people with MS has<br />
been slightly controversial – some people have said yes, and<br />
others have been unable to replicate those results.<br />
A study used a combination of biopsy and post-mortem brain<br />
tissue samples to see whether EBV-infected B cells could be<br />
detected in the brain; samples came from 17 pwMS and nine<br />
controls without neurological diseases.<br />
Latent EBV infection was detected using a marker called<br />
Latent Membrane Protein 1 (LMP1), and lytic infection was<br />
detected using a marker called BZLF1. LMP1 was detected<br />
in chronic lesions both with and without active inflammation.<br />
Importantly, LMP1 was also present in the brains of healthy<br />
individuals. BZLF1 was present in both control brains and<br />
brains from pwMS. Interestingly, BZLF1 was not present in<br />
chronic active lesions – this is surprising and implies that<br />
lytic infection is present in healthy brains, in chronic inactive<br />
lesions, but not in lesions with acute inflammation.<br />
The blog comments that this paper does not answer the<br />
question it set out to answer and they are unsure how to<br />
interpret these results. EBV-infected B cells appear to be<br />
present in both control and ‘MS’ brains, and may be slightly<br />
more common in MS.<br />
The best evidence to date does suggest that EBV is present<br />
in both MS and control brains, but is more common in pwMS<br />
(90% vs 24%).<br />
Clearly, the presence of EBV-infected B cells in the brain is<br />
not sufficient to drive disease activity. Further work needs to<br />
be done to understand why some people are perfectly healthy<br />
despite having EBV in their brain, whereas others go on to<br />
develop MS. Deeper understanding of how EBV is linked to MS<br />
is an essential first step towards developing safe treatments<br />
(and vaccines) which target EBV. EBV-targeted treatments are<br />
in early stages of development.<br />
Spinal cord volume loss: A marker of disease progression<br />
in multiple sclerosis.<br />
Tsagkas C, Magon S, Gaetano L, Pezold S, Naegelin Y,<br />
Amann M, Stippich C, Cattin P, Wuerfel J, Bieri O, Sprenger<br />
T, Kappos L, Parmar K.Neurology. <strong>2018</strong> Jun 27. pii: 10.1212/<br />
WNL.0000000000005853.<br />
Cross-sectional studies show that spinal cord volume (SCV)<br />
loss is related to disease severity in MS. However, long-term<br />
data is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate SCV loss as a<br />
biomarker of disease progression in comparison to other MRI<br />
measurements in a large cohort of patients with relapseonset<br />
MS with a six -year follow-up.<br />
The upper cervical SCV, total brain volume, and the brain T2<br />
lesion volume were measured annually in 231 patients with<br />
MS (180 RRMS and 51 SPMS) over six years using three<br />
-dimensional, T1-weighted, MRI images. Expanded Disability<br />
Status Scale (EDSS) score and relapses were recorded at<br />
every follow-up.<br />
8 | MSWA BULLETIN SPRING <strong>2018</strong>