18.09.2018 Views

Bulletin Spring 2018

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Read more at:<br />

mswa.org.au/researchupdate<br />

From the Barts Blog.<br />

EBV in the brain<br />

Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) is a herpes virus spread by saliva and<br />

infects around 95% of us during our lifetimes. In many people<br />

EBV infection does not cause prominent symptoms – it may<br />

cause a ‘flu-like’ illness which gets better on its own, or it<br />

may go completely unnoticed.<br />

Some people infected with EBV experience the more severe<br />

illness – glandular fever or infectious mononucleosis – with<br />

fatigue, sore throat, enlarged lymph nodes, fevers, and a mild<br />

hepatitis (liver inflammation).<br />

There is lots of evidence to suggest a link between EBV<br />

infection and the risk of developing MS:<br />

• PwMS have high levels of antibodies, suggesting a specific<br />

immune response against EBV<br />

• Slightly higher rates of EBV infection in pwMS; 100% of<br />

pwMS are infected vs 95% of the general population<br />

• Increased risk of developing MS after glandular fever; 2.5x<br />

more likely<br />

• The detection of EBV infection in the brains of pwMS<br />

The hypothesis that EBV infection is an important step<br />

in developing MS makes sense. We know EBV evades the<br />

immune system by infecting B cells, driving them towards<br />

dormancy, and then promoting their long-term survival.<br />

EBV has an ingenious arsenal of tricks to promote its own<br />

survival by fashioning a long-term niche for itself inside B<br />

cells. This dormant period is termed ‘latent EBV infection.’<br />

A minority of EBV-infected cells will enter the ‘lytic phase’ of<br />

infection, in which the virus rapidly replicates, kills the host<br />

cells, and is shed to infect other cells. Recent data suggests<br />

that B cells are key drivers of the disease, any factor which<br />

promotes survival of B cells and hijacks the normal pathways<br />

of B cell maturation could conceivably predispose people to<br />

developing the disease.<br />

Whether EBV is present in the brains of people with MS has<br />

been slightly controversial – some people have said yes, and<br />

others have been unable to replicate those results.<br />

A study used a combination of biopsy and post-mortem brain<br />

tissue samples to see whether EBV-infected B cells could be<br />

detected in the brain; samples came from 17 pwMS and nine<br />

controls without neurological diseases.<br />

Latent EBV infection was detected using a marker called<br />

Latent Membrane Protein 1 (LMP1), and lytic infection was<br />

detected using a marker called BZLF1. LMP1 was detected<br />

in chronic lesions both with and without active inflammation.<br />

Importantly, LMP1 was also present in the brains of healthy<br />

individuals. BZLF1 was present in both control brains and<br />

brains from pwMS. Interestingly, BZLF1 was not present in<br />

chronic active lesions – this is surprising and implies that<br />

lytic infection is present in healthy brains, in chronic inactive<br />

lesions, but not in lesions with acute inflammation.<br />

The blog comments that this paper does not answer the<br />

question it set out to answer and they are unsure how to<br />

interpret these results. EBV-infected B cells appear to be<br />

present in both control and ‘MS’ brains, and may be slightly<br />

more common in MS.<br />

The best evidence to date does suggest that EBV is present<br />

in both MS and control brains, but is more common in pwMS<br />

(90% vs 24%).<br />

Clearly, the presence of EBV-infected B cells in the brain is<br />

not sufficient to drive disease activity. Further work needs to<br />

be done to understand why some people are perfectly healthy<br />

despite having EBV in their brain, whereas others go on to<br />

develop MS. Deeper understanding of how EBV is linked to MS<br />

is an essential first step towards developing safe treatments<br />

(and vaccines) which target EBV. EBV-targeted treatments are<br />

in early stages of development.<br />

Spinal cord volume loss: A marker of disease progression<br />

in multiple sclerosis.<br />

Tsagkas C, Magon S, Gaetano L, Pezold S, Naegelin Y,<br />

Amann M, Stippich C, Cattin P, Wuerfel J, Bieri O, Sprenger<br />

T, Kappos L, Parmar K.Neurology. <strong>2018</strong> Jun 27. pii: 10.1212/<br />

WNL.0000000000005853.<br />

Cross-sectional studies show that spinal cord volume (SCV)<br />

loss is related to disease severity in MS. However, long-term<br />

data is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate SCV loss as a<br />

biomarker of disease progression in comparison to other MRI<br />

measurements in a large cohort of patients with relapseonset<br />

MS with a six -year follow-up.<br />

The upper cervical SCV, total brain volume, and the brain T2<br />

lesion volume were measured annually in 231 patients with<br />

MS (180 RRMS and 51 SPMS) over six years using three<br />

-dimensional, T1-weighted, MRI images. Expanded Disability<br />

Status Scale (EDSS) score and relapses were recorded at<br />

every follow-up.<br />

8 | MSWA BULLETIN SPRING <strong>2018</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!