You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a<br />
144 OUR ANCESTORS CAME FROM OUTER SPACE<br />
puter would in his turn translate that March 21 into the 286th day<br />
before the end of the year, the equivalent of 0.783 of one year,<br />
and write our date down as — 6.783. Such an expression can be<br />
fed into a computer, it can be compared to any other positive or<br />
negative dates in Gregorian, Hebrew, or Moslem calendars, and<br />
it can indicate the time with fantastic precision of a few seconds,<br />
minutes, or hours, depending on the number of decimals used.<br />
But such a system is neither easy or simple to use, nor very<br />
exact. It would be much simpler to count in whole days and in<br />
positive dates only, starting from an event very far in the past,<br />
preferably some exceptional astronomical event that took place<br />
at least 100,000 years ago, such as the ahgnment of all planets<br />
at the same point on the ecliptic that must have taken place at<br />
least once in the history of our solar system.<br />
By pinpointing such a moment, we would establish a zero<br />
point for counting time and also a zero point in longitude—<br />
starting line for all planetary movements. The whole world<br />
would then have a common chronological system enabling us to<br />
make all time computations childishly simple and precise.<br />
I have tried to establish such a starting point in time and longi-<br />
seem<br />
tude for my own use but encountered some obstacles that<br />
to be at the present time impossible to overcome. The trouble is<br />
that the French astronomers on one side and the Russian and<br />
American astronomers on the other use diflferent values for the<br />
same planetary revolutions and conjunctions, with considerable<br />
dijfferences for Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto. The French data<br />
comes closest to the values obtained from the Constant of<br />
Nineveh for planetary revolutions, but any attempt to calculate<br />
the zero point in time and longitude from French data would be<br />
rejected automatically by the Russian and American astronomers.<br />
So I have given it up for the present, hoping that the time<br />
might come when imiform astronomical tables will be introduced<br />
globally.<br />
The main problem is the impossibility to calculate precisely<br />
the past conjunctions of Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.<br />
Here the Russian and American numbers are closer to<br />
those of the Nineveh Constant than the French data. The<br />
diflference shows up in the third and fourth place after the decimal<br />
point only, but for calculations over very long periods of