15.01.2019 Views

mch

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a<br />

144 OUR ANCESTORS CAME FROM OUTER SPACE<br />

puter would in his turn translate that March 21 into the 286th day<br />

before the end of the year, the equivalent of 0.783 of one year,<br />

and write our date down as — 6.783. Such an expression can be<br />

fed into a computer, it can be compared to any other positive or<br />

negative dates in Gregorian, Hebrew, or Moslem calendars, and<br />

it can indicate the time with fantastic precision of a few seconds,<br />

minutes, or hours, depending on the number of decimals used.<br />

But such a system is neither easy or simple to use, nor very<br />

exact. It would be much simpler to count in whole days and in<br />

positive dates only, starting from an event very far in the past,<br />

preferably some exceptional astronomical event that took place<br />

at least 100,000 years ago, such as the ahgnment of all planets<br />

at the same point on the ecliptic that must have taken place at<br />

least once in the history of our solar system.<br />

By pinpointing such a moment, we would establish a zero<br />

point for counting time and also a zero point in longitude—<br />

starting line for all planetary movements. The whole world<br />

would then have a common chronological system enabling us to<br />

make all time computations childishly simple and precise.<br />

I have tried to establish such a starting point in time and longi-<br />

seem<br />

tude for my own use but encountered some obstacles that<br />

to be at the present time impossible to overcome. The trouble is<br />

that the French astronomers on one side and the Russian and<br />

American astronomers on the other use diflferent values for the<br />

same planetary revolutions and conjunctions, with considerable<br />

dijfferences for Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto. The French data<br />

comes closest to the values obtained from the Constant of<br />

Nineveh for planetary revolutions, but any attempt to calculate<br />

the zero point in time and longitude from French data would be<br />

rejected automatically by the Russian and American astronomers.<br />

So I have given it up for the present, hoping that the time<br />

might come when imiform astronomical tables will be introduced<br />

globally.<br />

The main problem is the impossibility to calculate precisely<br />

the past conjunctions of Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.<br />

Here the Russian and American numbers are closer to<br />

those of the Nineveh Constant than the French data. The<br />

diflference shows up in the third and fourth place after the decimal<br />

point only, but for calculations over very long periods of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!