22.12.2012 Views

China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Secrets

China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Secrets

China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Secrets

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CRS-37<br />

hearing the documents emerged, dismissed those doubts about Lee being the prime<br />

suspect, saying that FBI agents were “thrown <strong>of</strong>f” course by the 1998 polygraph. 140<br />

By November 1999, the FBI reportedly obtained new evidence that <strong>China</strong><br />

acquired information about U.S. nuclear weapons from a facility that assembles those<br />

weapons. The evidence apparently stemmed from errors in the PRC intelligence<br />

document said to contain a description <strong>of</strong> the W88 warhead. The errors were then<br />

traced to one <strong>of</strong> the “integrators” <strong>of</strong> the weapons, possibly including Sandia National<br />

Lab, Lockheed Martin Corporation (which runs Sandia), and the Navy. 141<br />

On May 16, 2000, Attorney General Janet Reno reportedly was briefed on the<br />

classified, four-volume report <strong>of</strong> the Justice Department’s internal review <strong>of</strong> its<br />

handling <strong>of</strong> the original investigation. The review by federal prosecutor Randy<br />

Bellows reportedly said that the FBI mishandled the espionage probe, in part because<br />

<strong>of</strong> internal turf wars, by not acting sooner, not committing enough resources sooner,<br />

and prematurely focusing on Wen Ho Lee as the only prime suspect. The report was<br />

said to state that the government could have discovered Lee’s downloading <strong>of</strong><br />

computer files years earlier, since he had signed a privacy waiver and a court order<br />

was not required. 142 FBI agents acknowledged multiple mistakes in the investigation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Wen Ho Lee. 143 New details about Bellows’ report emerged in August 2001, when<br />

the Washington Post said that the report contained extensive criticisms <strong>of</strong> the FBI,<br />

its field <strong>of</strong>fice in Albuquerque, DOE, and the Justice Department’s OIPR. Bellows<br />

found that DOE made “misleading representations” about Wen Ho Lee in a 1995<br />

report that prompted the FBI’s investigation and that the FBI spent “years<br />

investigating the wrong crime.” 144<br />

In October 2000, it was reported that the investigation had shifted significantly<br />

to examine the Pentagon and its facilities and contractors, after intelligence agencies<br />

concluded that PRC espionage acquired more classified U.S. missile technology,<br />

including that on the heat shield, than nuclear weapon secrets. Difficulties in<br />

translating 13,000 pages <strong>of</strong> secret PRC documents resulted in this delayed finding.<br />

The Pentagon then decided to hire 450 counter-intelligence experts. 145<br />

140 Loeb, Vernon, “Spy Probe Raised Doubts,” Washington Post, March 7, 2000.<br />

141 Loeb, Vernon and Walter Pincus, “FBI Widens Chinese Espionage Probe,” Washington<br />

Post, November 19, 1999.<br />

142 Vise, David A. and Vernon Loeb, “Justice Study Faults FBI in Spy Case,” Washington<br />

Post, May 19, 2000.<br />

143 Cohen P. Laurie and David S. Cloud, “How Federal Agents Bungled the Spy Case<br />

Against Lee,” Wall Street Journal, December 8, 2000.<br />

144 Eggen, Dan and Ellen Nakashima, “U.S. Probe <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> Scientist Assailed,”<br />

Washington Post, August 14, 2001; Dan Eggen, “Report Details More FBI Blunders in Wen<br />

Ho Lee Probe,” Washington Post, August 27, 2001.<br />

145 Pincus, Walter and Vernon Loeb, “<strong>China</strong> Spy Probe Shifts to Missiles,” Washington<br />

Post, October 19, 2000; “Pentagon to Add 450 Experts to Protect Defense <strong>Secrets</strong>,” October<br />

27, 2000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!