China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Secrets
China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Secrets
China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Secrets
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>China</strong>: <strong>Suspected</strong> <strong>Acquisition</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
U.S. <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Weapon</strong> <strong>Secrets</strong><br />
Challenges to U.S. Security<br />
Congressional Concerns and Policy Issues<br />
In early 1999, Congress heightened concerns about security over nuclear<br />
weapon data at the U.S. nuclear weapon laboratories (Lawrence Livermore, Los<br />
Alamos, and Sandia) after public news reports said that the People’s Republic <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>China</strong> (PRC) may have acquired the design <strong>of</strong> the W88 nuclear warhead in the 1980s.<br />
This case was the third publicly reported case involving <strong>China</strong>’s suspected<br />
compromise <strong>of</strong> U.S. nuclear weapon secrets.<br />
In April 1999, President Clinton stated that the PRC had fewer than two dozen<br />
long-range nuclear weapons, compared to 6,000 in the U.S. arsenal. Nevertheless,<br />
some were concerned that <strong>China</strong> was developing a new DF-31 solid-fuel, mobile<br />
intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), with a range <strong>of</strong> about 5,000 miles,<br />
reportedly with a smaller warhead (700 kg; 1,500 lb.) than the current DF-5A<br />
ICBMs. In addition, <strong>China</strong> reportedly had programs to develop a next-generation JL-<br />
2 submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) and a longer-range ICBM. 1<br />
This controversy about the W-88 warhead raised policy issues about whether<br />
U.S. security was further threatened by the PRC’s suspected use <strong>of</strong> U.S. nuclear<br />
weapon secrets in its development <strong>of</strong> smaller nuclear warheads and new ICBMs, as<br />
well as whether the Administration’s response to the security problem was effective<br />
or mishandled and whether it fairly used or abused its investigative and prosecuting<br />
authority. The case also raised questions about the roles <strong>of</strong> the media and Congress.<br />
Public Cases <strong>of</strong> Alleged Security Compromises<br />
Suspicions about PRC attempts to acquire secrets from U.S. nuclear weapon<br />
labs were longstanding, including congressional concerns discussed below. A 1994<br />
book on PRC intelligence cited the head <strong>of</strong> counterintelligence at the Federal Bureau<br />
<strong>of</strong> Intelligence (FBI) in Los Angeles as saying that the PRC had tried to recruit<br />
people at Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore labs. 2 In the three publicly reported<br />
cases that occurred in the late 1970s to 1980s, <strong>China</strong> may have conducted clandestine<br />
1 See CRS Report 97-391, <strong>China</strong>: Ballistic and Cruise Missiles, by Shirley A. Kan; and CRS<br />
Report 97-1022, Chinese <strong>Nuclear</strong> Testing and Warhead Development, by Jonathan Medalia.<br />
2 Eftimiades, Nicholas. Chinese Intelligence Operations (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press,<br />
1994), p. 6.