26.02.2021 Views

1736 Magazine - Vision for the Future

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Augusta riverfront, Lock and Dam<br />

future unclear<br />

By TOM CORWIN<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> legal battle<br />

continues, Augusta's<br />

riverfront is safe <strong>for</strong><br />

now.<br />

Augusta, North<br />

Augusta and South Carolina have<br />

been battling <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Corps<br />

of Engineers over its plan to remove<br />

New Savannah Bluff Lock and<br />

Dam and replace it with a rock<br />

weir fish passage that would allow<br />

endangered Atlantic and shortnose<br />

sturgeon to reach traditional<br />

spawning grounds near Augusta<br />

currently blocked by <strong>the</strong> structure.<br />

The fish passage is part of <strong>the</strong><br />

mitigation <strong>the</strong> Corps must per<strong>for</strong>m<br />

to make up <strong>for</strong> damage to<br />

<strong>the</strong> habitat <strong>for</strong> those fish in <strong>the</strong><br />

Savannah River caused by <strong>the</strong><br />

Savannah Harbor Expansion<br />

Project as it deepens that port to<br />

accommodate larger ships.<br />

But more than 100 miles away,<br />

<strong>the</strong> plan would also lower <strong>the</strong> pool<br />

of water in <strong>the</strong> Savannah River<br />

along <strong>the</strong> prized riverfronts in<br />

Augusta and North Augusta, which<br />

<strong>the</strong> Corps maintains is necessary<br />

so that <strong>the</strong> new structure doesn't<br />

cause nuisance flooding.<br />

Just how low it would go became<br />

clear in a simulation <strong>the</strong> Corps<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med in February 2019,<br />

which left submerged hazards in<br />

<strong>the</strong> river exposed and left muddy<br />

flats with docks and boats sitting<br />

on <strong>the</strong> ground across North<br />

Augusta. The already unpopular<br />

plan sparked howls of outrage on<br />

both sides of <strong>the</strong> river even as <strong>the</strong><br />

Corps proceeded to implement it<br />

and eventually <strong>the</strong> state of South<br />

Carolina sued to stop it, joined by<br />

<strong>the</strong> City of Augusta.<br />

The heart of <strong>the</strong>ir argument is<br />

that <strong>the</strong> plan violates <strong>the</strong> Water<br />

Infrastructure Improvements<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation Act of 2016 that<br />

required <strong>the</strong> pool be maintained at<br />

<strong>the</strong> level it was when <strong>the</strong> law was<br />

passed in December 2016. While<br />

<strong>the</strong> law allows <strong>the</strong> Corps to deauthorize<br />

and remove <strong>the</strong> crumbling<br />

<strong>1736</strong>magazine.com | 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!