14 2 Learning Analytics KitchenBerg, A., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Ternier, S., & Specht, M. (2016). Dutch cooking with xAPIrecipes: The good, the bad, and the consistent. In 2016 IEEE 16th international conference onadvanced learning technologies (ICALT) (pp. 234–236). Austin, TX: IEEE.Buckingham Shum, S. (2012). Learning analytics. UNESCO IITE policy brief. Retrieved fromhttp://iite.unesco.org/files/policy_briefs/pdf/en/learning_analytics.pdfChatti, M. A., Dyckhoff, A. L., Schroeder, U., & Thüs, H. (2012). A reference model for learninganalytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5-6), 318–331.d’Aquin, M., Dietze, S., Herder, E., Drachsler, H., & Taibi, D. (2014). Using linked data in learninganalytics. eLearning papers, 36. Retrieved from http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/download/file/fid/33993Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and analytics: It’s a DELICATE issue a checklist fortrusted learning analytics. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learninganalytics & knowledge (LAK ’16) (pp. 89–98). New York: ACM.Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Santos, O. C., & Manouselis, N. (2015). Panorama of recommendersystems to support learning. In F. Rici, L. Rokach, & B. Shapira (Eds.), 2nd handbook onrecommender systems (pp. 421–451). New York: Springer.Fazeli, S., Loni, B., Drachsler, H., & Sloep, P. (2014). Which recommender system can best fitsocial learning platforms? In 9th European conference on technology enhanced learning(EC-TEL 2014) (pp. 84–97). Graz, Austria: Springer.Greller, W., & Drachsler, H. (2012). Translating learning into numbers: A generic framework forlearning analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 42–57.Kramer, A. D., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scaleemotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,111(24), 8788–8790.Nistor, N., Derntl, M., & Klamma, R. (2015). Learning analytics: Trends and issues of the empiricalresearch of the years 2011-2014. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on technologyenhanced learning (pp. 453–459). Toledo, Spain: Springer.Open University UK. (2014). Policy on ethical use of student data for learning analytics. Retrievedfrom http://www.open.ac.uk/students/charter/sites/www.open.ac.uk.students.charter/files/files/ecms/web-content/ethical-student-data-faq.pdfPapamitsiou, Z. K., Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2014). Temporal learning analytics forcomputer based testing. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learninganalytics and knowledge (pp. 31–35). Indianapolis: ACM.Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Stoyanov, S., & Specht, M. (2014). Quality indicators for learninganalytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 117.Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., de Kraker, J., Kreijns, K., Slootmaker, A., & Specht, M. (2017a).Widget, widget on the wall, am I performing well at all? IEEE Transactions on LearningTechnologies, 10(1), 42–52.Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Toisoul, C., Ternier, S., & Specht, M. (2017b). The proof of the pudding:Examining validity and reliability of the evaluation framework for learning analytics. In Europeanconference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 194–208). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Siemens, G., Dawson, S., & Lynch, G. (2013). Improving the quality and productivity of the highereducation sector – policy and strategy for systems-level deployment of learning analytics.Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://solaresearch.org/Policy_Strategy_Analytics.pdfSin, K., & Muthu, L. (2015). Application of big data in education data mining and learninganalytics: A literature review. ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, 5(4), 1035–1049.Singer, N. (2014, April 21). InBloom student data repository to close. New York Times. Retrievedfrom https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/21/inbloom-student-data-repository-to-close/Tsai, Y. S., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Tammets, K., Kollom, K., & Gašević, D. (2018). SHEILApolicy framework: Informing institutional strategies and policy processes of learning analytics.In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge(pp. 320–329). Sydney, Australia: ACM.
Chapter 3Responsible Cooking with LearningAnalyticsAbstract Misuse of students’ data may cause significant harm. Educational institutionshave always analyzed their students’ data to some extent, but earlier that datawas stored locally and in analog form. The digital revolution has led to more databeing generated, stored, and linked, and more conclusions drawn from it. These newpossibilities demand a new code of conduct for generating, processing, using, andarchiving student data. It is crucial that ethical aspects are carefully consideredbefore collecting and using such data in learning analytics scenarios. This chaptergives an overview of legal regulations, illustrates the critical aspects of working withdigital student data, and provides practical frameworks for ethics and data protection.This chapter includes parts of legislations and guidelines that were presented ina published article: Steiner, C. M., Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., & Albert, D. (2016). LEAin private: a privacy and data protection framework for a learning analyticstoolbox. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 66-90. This chapter updates andextends the original article.Keywords Data protection · Ethics · Guidelines3.1 The Responsible Learning Analytics KitchenToday’s learners have access to a broad range of digital devices, learning tools,applications, and resources. Learning experiences occur in virtual and simulatedenvironments (e.g., serious games), and students connect to each other in socialnetworks, so the lines between the use of technology in educational settings, whetherin schools or in the field of workplace learning, and private settings are increasinglyblurred. All of these interactions and links could be captured, and multifacetedlearning processes can be analyzed using big-data analytics techniques (Pardo andSiemens 2014). However, the increasing digitization of education, the increasingcapacity and adoption of learning analytics, and the increasing linkage of variousdata sources have created ethical and privacy issues. An example is the advancementin sensor technologies, wearables, and near-field communication technologies thatallow a person’s activities, locations, and contextual data to be tracked without the© The Author(s) 2020R. Jaakonmäki et al., Learning Analytics Cookbook, SpringerBriefs in BusinessProcess Management, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43377-2_315