24.12.2012 Views

From: (Neil Wagner) - CED Magic

From: (Neil Wagner) - CED Magic

From: (Neil Wagner) - CED Magic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Subject: Re: <strong>CED</strong> <strong>Magic</strong> Update<br />

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 04:04:27 GMT<br />

On Sat, 11 Jan 1997, Tom Howe wrote<br />

to the <strong>CED</strong> mailing list:<br />

> The <strong>CED</strong> Title Database has also been fully linked to<br />

> the Internet Movie Database. The site URL is:<br />

> http://www.teleport.com/~ceds/selectavision.html<br />

Hey, Tom, this sounds great. I'm off to check it out.<br />

<strong>Neil</strong> - nw@ix.netcom.com<br />

------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

<strong>From</strong>: (<strong>Neil</strong> <strong>Wagner</strong>)<br />

To: ceds@teleport.com<br />

Subject: Videodisc History, Part 7<br />

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 04:04:31 GMT<br />

Here's a big one. A full two page article with photos and cutaway<br />

diagrams from the July 1980 Popular Science. (Sorry, I don't have<br />

the capability to reproduce the pictures on the computer.)<br />

Optical vs. mechanical:<br />

the coming battle of the<br />

VIDEO-DISC PLAYERS<br />

Several incompatible disc machines will<br />

tease the eager buyer next year.<br />

--------------------------------------by<br />

John Free<br />

If you're confused by ads citing advantages of one video-*tape*<br />

machine over an incompatible competitor, brace yourself. More<br />

befuddlement is brewing. Early next year, makers of two--and perhaps<br />

three--mutually incompatible video-*disc* players will each be<br />

shouting the virtues of their products while cleverly knocking the<br />

others.<br />

Battle lines between two differing disc technologies took shape in<br />

the early 1970's with demonstrations of early lab prototypes. Despite<br />

attempts at standardization, the lines hardened for two types of disc<br />

players. Optical, involving touchless disc playback with a laser<br />

beam, and mechanical systems, requiring contact between the disc and<br />

pickup stylus.<br />

Proponents of the mechanical system point out the basic simplicity<br />

of their approach and its low costs for mass marketing. Those favoring<br />

optical systems stress the no-wear advantages of laser-beam<br />

playback. (Lasers last over 10,000 hours.) Proponents of the optical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!