SHILL Issue 64

ex. During the recent @TaiyoRobotics FUD (“what has Solport Tom done”), community members were quick to
give their perspective. @SolportTom hosted a space to clarify some info, and it had immediate benefits
seanytsunami.sol
So @SolportTom hops on one twitter spaces and this is what happens? @TaiyoRobotics
Community engagement: the need for engagement doesn’t stop post-mint. It takes consistency to solidify a
project as a big player in the space. Pfp usage, tasteful raiding, and keeping up with news on discord are always
beneficial for spreading the word. ex. @CetsOnCreck/@CetsCommunity made a name for themselves by being
loud af, to the point where you would have to be sleeping under a rock to not know about them. They may even
raid this tweet too.
Matching the market: it is important that a project’s supply and price are reasonable given the context of the
market. It is also an important consideration whether the project either uplifts or intentionally rejects (riskier)
the market meta.
This can understandably be hard to get right, given that the larger market is outside of a team’s control. This
leads me to the next point...
Flexibility. A team/community that can make pivots
based on market conditions, metas, etc. will almost
win over a project with rigidity. Managing expectations
and not making promises too far in advance
are good signs.
Not all of the factors in the first figure are relevant to
every project. However, I would expect a team to at
least have thought about + considered these factors
before launch. Hold upcoming projects accountable
-- we can create a better space by asking tough
questions.
Thanks for reading. I hope you found something in
here helpful. Do you agree? Disagree? Special S/O to
@LitecoinYagami’s content army for the feedback .
42
SHILL Issue #64