14.07.2022 Views

LSB July 2022 LR

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FROM THE CONDUCT COMMISSIONER<br />

Communication and money:<br />

Outgoing Conduct<br />

Commissioner reflects on the<br />

main causes of complaints<br />

GREG MAY, LEGAL PROFESSION CONDUCT COMMISSIONER<br />

will soon be moving on from my role as<br />

I Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner.<br />

My last day will be 31 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2022</strong>.<br />

For my final article for the Bulletin, I<br />

will be reflecting on a few things from my<br />

time as Commissioner.<br />

The first thing I will say is that it seems<br />

to me that there are two main reasons that<br />

complaints are made by clients. The first<br />

is poor communication. The second is<br />

money.<br />

From a communication point of<br />

view, the problems are usually one of the<br />

following:<br />

• not giving advice that is sufficiently<br />

clear, or at least sufficiently understood<br />

by the client;<br />

• not managing a client’s expectations<br />

– in any number of respects (eg as<br />

to timing of the matter, timing as to<br />

something you have said you will do,<br />

the outcome of the matter, or your<br />

costs);<br />

• simply not responding in a timely<br />

fashion (or, often, at all) to a client’s<br />

emails or phone calls.<br />

It’s important to remember that many<br />

clients who complain to my office are<br />

those who are involved in a legal matter<br />

for the first time. They are not in any<br />

way experienced in what the legal system<br />

has in store for them! They simply don’t<br />

understand the system, they don’t know<br />

how long something is meant to take, and<br />

they certainly don’t appreciate how busy<br />

you are!<br />

So, it’s important that you:<br />

• answer a client’s calls and/or emails –<br />

even if just to say you’re busy or away<br />

and that you’ll get back to them as soon<br />

as you can;<br />

• tell a client if there is going to be a delay<br />

in what you’ve said you’ll do, and why;<br />

• don’t pretend you have done something<br />

for a client when you actually haven’t<br />

done it yet.<br />

And now let’s talk money. Because<br />

some of you aren’t very good at doing that<br />

with your clients – in fact, some of you are<br />

terrible at it!<br />

What you are obliged to tell your client<br />

about costs is set out in Schedule 3 of the<br />

Legal Practitioners Act. At its simplest, and<br />

yet at its most important, for most clients<br />

you MUST:<br />

• estimate the total legal costs (or a range<br />

of estimates of the total legal costs)<br />

and explain the major variables that will<br />

affect the calculation of those costs; and<br />

• tell the client of any substantial change<br />

to that estimate (or range of estimates)<br />

as soon as is reasonably practicable after<br />

you become aware of that change.<br />

If you don’t comply with that obligation<br />

then you run a number of significant risks:<br />

• the client doesn’t have to pay your fees<br />

(unless you first have them adjudicated<br />

by the Supreme Court);<br />

• you therefore (and quite obviously)<br />

can’t sue the client to recover your fees<br />

(unless you first have them adjudicated<br />

by the Supreme Court);<br />

• you may have engaged in misconduct.<br />

So, let’s just imagine that you agree that<br />

most of those outcomes are bad. The good<br />

thing is that to avoid them, all you have to<br />

do is comply with the Legal Practitioners Act!!!<br />

Sorry for the sarcasm, but it is<br />

warranted. I’m sure I only see the tip of<br />

the iceberg, but there are many lawyers<br />

who still don’t do what they need to do in<br />

this respect. And I’m sure that they know<br />

they should! Is it just embarrassment at<br />

how much lawyers charge? Is it that they<br />

think the client won’t continue to instruct<br />

them if they actually know how much it’s<br />

likely to cost?<br />

If that’s the case, then please get over<br />

it! The downside is much worse, and<br />

your client will always appreciate full costs<br />

disclosure (ie the truth!!!) so that he or she<br />

can make a fully informed decision about<br />

how to proceed.<br />

So, on to a slightly different, but related,<br />

topic. After 8.5 years in this role, what are<br />

my impressions of the profession generally?<br />

I still admire it enormously, as I always<br />

have. As you all know, the profession<br />

provides a critical service to the community.<br />

Everyone works hard. Many of you do<br />

work for clients who are disadvantaged in<br />

any number of ways. But many of you<br />

also do work for clients who are extremely<br />

challenging, and who don’t understand what<br />

you are trying to do for them. Some of<br />

you need to do better at explaining things<br />

to those clients (although I do accept that<br />

some of them can’t be told!).<br />

And I am, frankly, staggered at how<br />

many of you still don’t comply with the<br />

costs disclosure requirements. In the first<br />

five years or so, I made on average about<br />

20 misconduct findings a year. In the last<br />

few years that has increased to the low 30s,<br />

with that increase being directly attributable<br />

to Schedule 3 breaches.<br />

Some might think that that’s not<br />

too bad in a profession that comprises<br />

more than 4,000 people. But it’s still too<br />

many, and just getting the basics right<br />

about communication and money would<br />

undoubtedly mean a lot fewer unhappy<br />

clients than there are now. B<br />

<strong>July</strong> <strong>2022</strong> THE BULLETIN 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!