LSB July 2022 LR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
RISK WATCH<br />
“Are you able to confirm that to the best<br />
of your knowledge it [the lease provided to<br />
Maddocks] is an accurate and complete copy<br />
of the lease? (It appears to be, however if for<br />
example there are any side-deeds or variations,<br />
then the document is not ‘complete’).”<br />
The principal director of About Life,<br />
Ms Phillips, read the email at about the<br />
time she was leaving the office to go to her<br />
daughter’s 18 th birthday celebration. The<br />
email did not trigger Ms Phillips’ memory<br />
that in 2014 About Life had in fact entered<br />
into a side-deed with Woolworths which<br />
granted Woolworths a “right of first refusal”<br />
should About Life seek to assign its<br />
leasehold interest in the Double Bay store.<br />
The sale proceeded on the basis that there<br />
were no relevant side-deeds.<br />
Approximately one month later, a<br />
representative of Woolworths asked<br />
Ms Phillips if About Life had sold the<br />
Double Bay store to Harris Farms. This<br />
was when Ms Phillips remembered that<br />
Woolworths had a right of first refusal to<br />
the assignment of the Double Bay lease.<br />
NEGLIGENCE FOUND<br />
The Court found that Ms Phillips’<br />
memory would have been triggered had<br />
proper instructions been taken from<br />
About Life earlier in the transaction rather<br />
than late in the afternoon on the day the<br />
contract of sale was due to be signed. It<br />
was also said by Rees J that<br />
“while, in theory, it was not ‘too late’ for About<br />
Life to act upon [the] request for instruction,<br />
the request was made so late, in urgent<br />
circumstances and inadequately explained such<br />
that it was not understood by the client, and<br />
obviously so. As a consequence Maddocks did<br />
not discharge its duty to the client to protect the<br />
client’s interests in the proposed transaction.”<br />
The Judge was therefore critical of the<br />
rather elliptical way in which the question<br />
of side-deeds was raised, i.e. it was not a<br />
direct question (”Are there any side-deeds?”)<br />
but merely an enquiry as to whether the<br />
entire lease had been provided.<br />
DAMAGES<br />
The damages payable by Maddocks<br />
were assessed at nearly $16m being “the<br />
difference between the trajectory which the company<br />
took, being external administration, and the<br />
trajectory it would have taken if it had entered<br />
into a contract with Woolworths at the outset.<br />
About Life’s damages are the gap between the two<br />
trajectories.”<br />
CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE<br />
About Life was found to have failed to<br />
take reasonable care of its own interests<br />
because, of course, the Directors – in<br />
particular Ms Phillips – knew of the sidedeed<br />
and had access to it as part of the<br />
company’s records. Rees J assessed the<br />
company’s contributory negligence at 20%.<br />
Her Honour found that where a<br />
company is proposing to sell a substantial<br />
asset it is reasonable for the company’s<br />
officers to check the company’s records<br />
in respect of that asset to ensure that<br />
the solicitor is provided with accurate<br />
and important details about the asset<br />
in question. Her Honour also found<br />
however that where the client is new<br />
to the solicitor, is giving instructions<br />
on an urgent matter of high value and<br />
importance, is stressed and distracted<br />
(as Ms Phillips was found to have been)<br />
the solicitor should bear greater<br />
responsibility to elicit this information.<br />
Maddocks therefore had to bear 80% of<br />
the loss assessed, around $13m.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The judgment, although lengthy<br />
(some 736 paragraphs), will repay<br />
careful consideration by all practitioners<br />
especially as regards the duties imposed<br />
on practitioners dealing with urgent<br />
commercial transactions.<br />
One wonders whether the same result<br />
would have been reached by the Court had<br />
Maddocks’ enquiry regarding any sidedeed<br />
been more directly worded and sent<br />
earlier than the “last minute”. I suspect that<br />
even if the Court found a breach of duty<br />
in those (postulated) circumstances, the<br />
assessment of the contributory negligence<br />
would have been much less favourable to<br />
the client company.<br />
The risk management lessons are<br />
therefore to seek full instructions in clear<br />
and direct terms as soon as possible.<br />
Practitioners who are insured with<br />
the SA Professional Indemnity Insurance<br />
Scheme have access to a number of<br />
document packages — including<br />
documents relating to Commercial Leasing<br />
and the Acquisition and Sale of Businesses<br />
— which provide a good starting point<br />
when seeking instructions in commercial<br />
matters. Risk Management Practice<br />
Packages (lawsocietysa.asn.au)<br />
<strong>July</strong> <strong>2022</strong> THE BULLETIN 33