14.06.2023 Views

Mars Science City – Space Architecture Design Studio 2020

The Mars Science City design studio topic fits into the long-term vision to build a human settlement on Mars. The students were first asked to look far into the future and imagine what a city on Mars would be like. How do they think people would live in about 100 years on another planet? What would they take with them from Earth, and what would they want to see totally different? The student teams have developed a conceptual vision of this city. In parallel they researched and worked on the environmental, technical and social challenges of getting to and being on Mars. Each team was asked to identify three major challenges and / or characteristics, based on their vision. What would be needed to start the settlement in order to become the city they have imagined? This was the most challenging part for the student’s teams, and became the starting point for the individual architectural solutions of the near-term project on Mars. Design Task S. 6 Teaching Team S. 16 The Students S. 24 Projects DUNE S. 30 Moving Mars S. 42 Terra Mars S. 54 AB-ORIGO S. 66 Protocity S. 76 Dune Haranea S. 86 Lighthouse S. 94 Arcadia City S. 104 Apoikia S. 114 Adventus S. 122 Ice Age S. 138 Teaching Team: Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger (Studio Director), Alexander S., Bannova O., Bier H., Bishop S., Ciardullo C., Esfand M., Farmwald L., Frischauf N., Gourlis B., Grömer G., Kahr F., Lamborelle O., Makaya A., Nixon D., Perino M., Russ C., Schechtner K., Schwehm G., Wong D.; Students: Binder D., Brajic A., Gojkovic B., Brückler A., Hamzic E., Kaprinayova E., Stauber B., Vorraber J., Podwalski K., Adnan M., Trinca E., Ahr S., Bula M., Ivanonva M., Stoyanova S., Graf J., Kugic A., Neumerkel R., Vecerdi M., Glinac M., Ramovic A., Schneider G., Ajdari S., Mujedini X., Gündar J.

The Mars Science City design studio topic fits into the long-term vision to build a human settlement on Mars. The students were first asked to look far into the future and imagine what a city on Mars would be like. How do they think people would live in about 100 years on another planet? What would they take with them from Earth, and what would they want to see totally different? The student teams have developed a conceptual vision of this city. In parallel they researched and worked on the environmental, technical and social challenges of getting to and being on Mars. Each team was asked to identify three major challenges and / or characteristics, based on their vision. What would be needed to start the settlement in order to become the city they have imagined? This was the most challenging part for the student’s teams, and became the starting point for the individual architectural solutions of the near-term project on Mars.

Design Task S. 6
Teaching Team S. 16
The Students S. 24
Projects
DUNE S. 30
Moving Mars S. 42
Terra Mars S. 54
AB-ORIGO S. 66
Protocity S. 76
Dune Haranea S. 86
Lighthouse S. 94
Arcadia City S. 104
Apoikia S. 114
Adventus S. 122
Ice Age S. 138

Teaching Team: Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger (Studio Director), Alexander S., Bannova O., Bier H., Bishop S., Ciardullo C., Esfand M., Farmwald L., Frischauf N., Gourlis B., Grömer G., Kahr F., Lamborelle O., Makaya A., Nixon D., Perino M., Russ C., Schechtner K., Schwehm G., Wong D.;
Students: Binder D., Brajic A., Gojkovic B., Brückler A., Hamzic E., Kaprinayova E., Stauber B., Vorraber J., Podwalski K., Adnan M., Trinca E., Ahr S., Bula M., Ivanonva M., Stoyanova S., Graf J., Kugic A., Neumerkel R., Vecerdi M., Glinac M., Ramovic A., Schneider G., Ajdari S., Mujedini X., Gündar J.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HB2 | MARS SCIENCE CITY

DESIGN STUDIO

APPROACH

WORK FROM HOME

materials of inflatable and deployable structures, which

can be efficiently packed and deployed to a greater volume

on site. The students also explored habitat typologies and

their specific characteristic of modularity, flexibility and

expansion concepts. In dependence of the mission scenario

additional transport vehicles for increased mobility and

long range exploration is required on site. Other necessary

infrastructure includes facilities for gaining and storing

energy, robotics and industrial manufacturing, in-situproducution

with on-site materials, and much more.

The Mars Science City design studio took place from March

to June 2020 at the Vienna University of Technology. During

this time, 12 projects were developed and elaborated by the

students.

As usual, the studio started at the beginning of March with

input lectures. Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger introduced

the studio topic and summarized important aspects of

going to and building on Mars. Norbert Frischauf gave an

overall input on Mars features and required technologies,

and Olivier Lamborelle talked about the work on the

International Space Station and future training facilities.

Following the input lectures, we discussed issues interested

for the students and they chose a research topic to prepare

for the design of a Mars habitation project.

The topics included basic information on Mars

characteristics, specific environmental challenges, science

opportunities and past, current and future planned missions.

Furthermore specific know-how on required technologies

for habitation design; thermal control systems, power

supply and energy stowage, shielding, maintenance and

supply, … to name a few.

Of great importance for a remote and extreme

environmental habitat on Mars are crew- and life support

systems, in-situ-resource utilisation and the implementation

of technical greenhouses for food production and

recycling. Different construction methods were analysed

and examined. Research included geometric studies, and

Overall the goal is to secure a safe and sustainable work

and living environment. For the human habitation design

challenges related to human activities include food

production, storage and recycling, hygiene and waste

collection. Social constraints and challenges include

intensive social interaction and isolation, personal space

and territorial issues. Each student team researched and

prepared their presentations on selected themes. However,

shortly before the next meeting, the course was switched

to distance learning due to Covid-19.

It was challenging, and all of us had to adapt to this new

situation. The topic of the studio was changed in that

together with the students we decided to work on a more

detailed concept for a city ON Mars.

The approach of the studio was to first translate their

their vision, of what they would like to see in a future city

on Earth, into a futuristic architectural concept. After

presentation and joint discussions, students were asked to

think of how this vision could start.

What would be needed now, in order to realize this

distant dream?

This ‚twist of thinking‘ was very challenging for the

students.

During the whole semester we could only meet online,

and students were spread around the world. Some of the

students got up early in the morning to join the sessions.

We met regularly and all meetings were open to all. Similarly

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!