16.04.2024 Views

EU Elections

EUobserver's guide to the 2024 European Parliament Elections.

EUobserver's guide to the 2024 European Parliament Elections.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>EU</strong>ROPEAN ELECTIONS<br />

sector hadn’t been involved enough.<br />

The commission has shifted efforts to<br />

a “Strategic Dialogue” on agriculture<br />

involving stakeholders from across the<br />

food system, to “depolarise” the debate.<br />

But the move sparked concern, with major<br />

environmental NGOs protesting the<br />

return to a ‘narrow focus’ on agricultural<br />

policy, as opposed to Farm-to-Fork’s holistic<br />

approach.<br />

Moreover, critics are contesting the narrative<br />

that pits farmers against environmental<br />

legislation, blaming lobby groups<br />

and the far-right for exploiting farmers’<br />

genuine grievances. Morgan Ody, farmer<br />

and general coordinator of the peasant<br />

organisation La Via Campesina, insisted<br />

that dropping environmental legislation<br />

only met the demands of the largest,<br />

richest farmers. “For most farmers,<br />

the main issue is a fair livelihood”, she<br />

said, arguing that the continued protest<br />

proved her point. “After the environmental<br />

stuff was dropped, Arnaud Rousseau<br />

[the head of the Copa-Cogeca agriculture<br />

lobby group] told us to go home. Farmers<br />

did not go home” Ody told the <strong>EU</strong>observer<br />

on the side of a farmers’ protest in<br />

Brussels.<br />

The MEPs<br />

in the AGRI<br />

committee<br />

never dare to<br />

do anything<br />

that upsets<br />

farmer’s<br />

lobbies."<br />

MEP Michal Wiezik<br />

MEP’s involved with the legislation<br />

expressed similar sentiments. Sarah<br />

Wiener, Green MEP and rapporteur for<br />

the SUR, argued that farmers could have<br />

benefited from the pesticide law. “With a<br />

little good will, farmers could have been<br />

motivated and helped to understand that<br />

the SUR is necessary and can even support<br />

them in their independence,” she<br />

said. But resistance was driven by conservative<br />

politicians and lobbyists opposing<br />

change, according to Wiener: “The<br />

pesticide lobby had a business model to<br />

lose.”<br />

Michal Wiezik, MEP for Renew Europe<br />

and member of the environment committee,<br />

also felt that resistance against<br />

Farm-to-Fork did not originate from<br />

most farmers themselves, and lambasted<br />

the outsized influence of the large<br />

agri-businesses on <strong>EU</strong> policy-making.<br />

“The MEPs in the AGRI committee never<br />

dare to do anything that upsets farmer’s<br />

lobbies,” Wiezik lamented.<br />

Reports by Corporate Observatory Europe<br />

and investigative platform DeSmog<br />

have highlighted the ties between the<br />

agri-food industry and <strong>EU</strong> policymakers,<br />

documenting the intense efforts of lobby<br />

groups like Copa-Cogeca and CorpLife<br />

to derail the SUR, and constant meetings<br />

between various MEP’s on the AGRI<br />

committee and industry representatives.<br />

Consequently, many farmers end up acting<br />

against their own interests, observed<br />

Natalia Mamonova, a political sociologist<br />

specialising in rural populism. “They<br />

demand to be less burdened by environmental<br />

regulations, but that results<br />

in a further deterioration of the soil of<br />

which they will themselves be the major<br />

victims.” Being locked into an unsustainable<br />

system of competition and intensification,<br />

makes farmers susceptible to<br />

the far-right, said Mamonova. “They feel<br />

they’re a group that has been overlooked<br />

for years, in favour of urban elites and<br />

transnational corporations, so there’s<br />

overlap in the narrative.”<br />

In the end, Farm-to-Fork’s flaw might<br />

have been that it still wasn’t holistic<br />

enough. With many farmers pushed to<br />

the brink by shrinking margins, lowering<br />

prices, and increased competition compounded<br />

by imports from Ukraine, the<br />

crisis in agriculture exposed the strategy’s<br />

lack of measures for economic support.<br />

Though emphasising that environmental<br />

protection would benefit farmers<br />

in the long run, Wiener acknowledged<br />

that Farm-to-Fork was light on economic<br />

support. “There were too few proposals<br />

to combat price pressure on the market<br />

or the supermarkets’ monopoly on<br />

trade,” she said.<br />

Supporters of Farm-to-Fork have now<br />

no choice but to put their hopes on the<br />

strategic dialogues delivering a breakthrough.<br />

But even if the commission<br />

manages to get all the different stakeholders<br />

on board without watering down<br />

all its proposals, implementation will be<br />

left to the new commission. With momentum<br />

for climate policy waning and<br />

the far-right gaining in the polls, it seems<br />

unlikely that Farm-to-Fork’s transformative<br />

potential will soon materialise. ◄<br />

About<br />

Piet Ruig<br />

Piet Ruig is a Brussels-based journalist,<br />

who previously worked for<br />

Dutch public broadcaster VPRO.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!