30.12.2012 Views

Download latest annual report - HT Media

Download latest annual report - HT Media

Download latest annual report - HT Media

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annual Report 2011-12<br />

33. Contingent Liabilities<br />

I. <strong>HT</strong> <strong>Media</strong> Limited<br />

a) During the year ended March 31, 2005, <strong>HT</strong> <strong>Media</strong><br />

Limited acquired the printing undertaking at New<br />

Delhi from its holding company namely The Hindustan<br />

Times Limited (<strong>HT</strong>L). The writ petition filed by the ex<br />

–workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L challenging the transfer of business<br />

was quashed by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court on<br />

May 9, 2006. Thereafter, the ex-workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L<br />

raised the industrial dispute before Delhi Government,<br />

who referred the dispute to Industrial Tribunal-I,<br />

Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi (Tribunal). During<br />

the course of the proceedings before Tribunal, the<br />

ex-workmen moved application for interim relief. The<br />

Tribunal vide its order dated March 8, 2007, granted<br />

interim relief to the ex-workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L to the extent<br />

of 50% of last drawn wages from the date of such order<br />

till the disposal of the matter.<br />

However, <strong>HT</strong>L challenged the said order before<br />

Hon’ble Delhi High Court in a writ petition, wherein<br />

the Hon’ble Court modified the order of the Tribunal<br />

to the extent that the amount equivalent to 50% so<br />

received by ex-workmen will be set off against their<br />

retrenchment compensation (not encashed by the<br />

above ex-workmen till date), in the event of <strong>HT</strong>L<br />

succeeding in the writ petition. The Hon’ble Court<br />

further clarified that payment will be made only from<br />

date of the High Court order (i.e. March 23, 2007) till<br />

the disposal of writ petition and it further stayed the<br />

order and proceedings pending before the Tribunal.<br />

The said writ stands disposed of by Delhi High Court<br />

vide order dated 16.01.2009 by holding that it was<br />

agreed between the parties to make the payment to<br />

ex-workmen till the amount of their retrenchment<br />

compensation is exhausted. The stay on the proceedings<br />

II. Hindustan <strong>Media</strong> Ventures Limited<br />

a) Claims against company not acknowledged as debts<br />

132<br />

before the Industrial Tribunal was also vacated by the<br />

Hon’ble Delhi High Court and accordingly proceedings<br />

before the Industrial Tribunal has re-started.<br />

The matter after final arguments stands disposed<br />

by the Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal has granted<br />

reinstatement to all the workers with continuity of<br />

services w.e.f. 03.10.2004 in The Hindustan Times<br />

Limited subject to workers refunding the retrenchment<br />

compensation received by them. No relief has been<br />

granted against the Company by the Tribunal.<br />

In the meanwhile the workmen in question in the<br />

said writ petition has filed contempt petition against<br />

Hindustan Times Limited and its Directors and same<br />

stands dismissed by Hon’ble Delhi High Court on 16th<br />

March 2012.<br />

b) Guarantee issued by the <strong>HT</strong> <strong>Media</strong> Ltd. to Bank against<br />

line of credit sanctioned to <strong>HT</strong> Burda <strong>Media</strong> Limited, a<br />

subsidiary, `3,500 lacs (Previous year `3,500 lacs)<br />

c) Guarantee issued by <strong>HT</strong> <strong>Media</strong>’s bankers on behalf of<br />

<strong>HT</strong> Burda <strong>Media</strong> Limited, a subsidiary, to third parties<br />

`18.00 lacs (Previous year `51.01 lacs)<br />

d) Income tax department has raised a demand of `2.36<br />

lacs (Previous year `2.36 lacs) for the Assessment Year<br />

2004-05 in respect of penalty levied in the assessment<br />

proceedings by Assessing Officer. The Company has<br />

filed an appeal against the order of the Assessing<br />

Officer to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The<br />

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has upheld<br />

the levy of penalty. The Company has filed an appeal<br />

against the order of the Commissioner of Income<br />

Tax (Appeals) to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.<br />

The Company has based on legal advice obtained is<br />

confident of winning the above case and is of view that<br />

no provision is required.<br />

Particulars As at<br />

31 March, 2012<br />

a) The Company has filed a petition before the Hon’ble Patna High Court against an<br />

initial claim for additional contribution of `73.37 lacs made by Employees State<br />

Insurance Corporation (ESIC) relating to the years 1989-90 to 1999-00. The<br />

Company has furnished a bank guarantee amounting to `12.50 lacs to ESIC and the<br />

Hon’ble High Court has stayed the matter. There is no further progress in the matter<br />

during last one year.<br />

b) The Company has filed a petition before the Hon’ble Patna High Court against the<br />

demand of `10.07 lacs (including interest) for short payment of ESI dues pertaining<br />

to the years from 2001 to 2005. The Hon’ble Patna High Court has stayed the<br />

matter. There is no further progress in the matter during last one year.<br />

(` in lacs)<br />

As at<br />

31 March, 2011<br />

73.37 73.37<br />

10.07 10.07<br />

(b) Bank guarantees issued by Company’s bankers on behalf of a fellow subsidiary Nil (Previous year `28.03 lacs)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!