Download latest annual report - HT Media
Download latest annual report - HT Media
Download latest annual report - HT Media
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Annual Report 2011-12<br />
33. Contingent Liabilities<br />
I. <strong>HT</strong> <strong>Media</strong> Limited<br />
a) During the year ended March 31, 2005, <strong>HT</strong> <strong>Media</strong><br />
Limited acquired the printing undertaking at New<br />
Delhi from its holding company namely The Hindustan<br />
Times Limited (<strong>HT</strong>L). The writ petition filed by the ex<br />
–workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L challenging the transfer of business<br />
was quashed by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court on<br />
May 9, 2006. Thereafter, the ex-workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L<br />
raised the industrial dispute before Delhi Government,<br />
who referred the dispute to Industrial Tribunal-I,<br />
Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi (Tribunal). During<br />
the course of the proceedings before Tribunal, the<br />
ex-workmen moved application for interim relief. The<br />
Tribunal vide its order dated March 8, 2007, granted<br />
interim relief to the ex-workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L to the extent<br />
of 50% of last drawn wages from the date of such order<br />
till the disposal of the matter.<br />
However, <strong>HT</strong>L challenged the said order before<br />
Hon’ble Delhi High Court in a writ petition, wherein<br />
the Hon’ble Court modified the order of the Tribunal<br />
to the extent that the amount equivalent to 50% so<br />
received by ex-workmen will be set off against their<br />
retrenchment compensation (not encashed by the<br />
above ex-workmen till date), in the event of <strong>HT</strong>L<br />
succeeding in the writ petition. The Hon’ble Court<br />
further clarified that payment will be made only from<br />
date of the High Court order (i.e. March 23, 2007) till<br />
the disposal of writ petition and it further stayed the<br />
order and proceedings pending before the Tribunal.<br />
The said writ stands disposed of by Delhi High Court<br />
vide order dated 16.01.2009 by holding that it was<br />
agreed between the parties to make the payment to<br />
ex-workmen till the amount of their retrenchment<br />
compensation is exhausted. The stay on the proceedings<br />
II. Hindustan <strong>Media</strong> Ventures Limited<br />
a) Claims against company not acknowledged as debts<br />
132<br />
before the Industrial Tribunal was also vacated by the<br />
Hon’ble Delhi High Court and accordingly proceedings<br />
before the Industrial Tribunal has re-started.<br />
The matter after final arguments stands disposed<br />
by the Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal has granted<br />
reinstatement to all the workers with continuity of<br />
services w.e.f. 03.10.2004 in The Hindustan Times<br />
Limited subject to workers refunding the retrenchment<br />
compensation received by them. No relief has been<br />
granted against the Company by the Tribunal.<br />
In the meanwhile the workmen in question in the<br />
said writ petition has filed contempt petition against<br />
Hindustan Times Limited and its Directors and same<br />
stands dismissed by Hon’ble Delhi High Court on 16th<br />
March 2012.<br />
b) Guarantee issued by the <strong>HT</strong> <strong>Media</strong> Ltd. to Bank against<br />
line of credit sanctioned to <strong>HT</strong> Burda <strong>Media</strong> Limited, a<br />
subsidiary, `3,500 lacs (Previous year `3,500 lacs)<br />
c) Guarantee issued by <strong>HT</strong> <strong>Media</strong>’s bankers on behalf of<br />
<strong>HT</strong> Burda <strong>Media</strong> Limited, a subsidiary, to third parties<br />
`18.00 lacs (Previous year `51.01 lacs)<br />
d) Income tax department has raised a demand of `2.36<br />
lacs (Previous year `2.36 lacs) for the Assessment Year<br />
2004-05 in respect of penalty levied in the assessment<br />
proceedings by Assessing Officer. The Company has<br />
filed an appeal against the order of the Assessing<br />
Officer to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The<br />
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has upheld<br />
the levy of penalty. The Company has filed an appeal<br />
against the order of the Commissioner of Income<br />
Tax (Appeals) to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.<br />
The Company has based on legal advice obtained is<br />
confident of winning the above case and is of view that<br />
no provision is required.<br />
Particulars As at<br />
31 March, 2012<br />
a) The Company has filed a petition before the Hon’ble Patna High Court against an<br />
initial claim for additional contribution of `73.37 lacs made by Employees State<br />
Insurance Corporation (ESIC) relating to the years 1989-90 to 1999-00. The<br />
Company has furnished a bank guarantee amounting to `12.50 lacs to ESIC and the<br />
Hon’ble High Court has stayed the matter. There is no further progress in the matter<br />
during last one year.<br />
b) The Company has filed a petition before the Hon’ble Patna High Court against the<br />
demand of `10.07 lacs (including interest) for short payment of ESI dues pertaining<br />
to the years from 2001 to 2005. The Hon’ble Patna High Court has stayed the<br />
matter. There is no further progress in the matter during last one year.<br />
(` in lacs)<br />
As at<br />
31 March, 2011<br />
73.37 73.37<br />
10.07 10.07<br />
(b) Bank guarantees issued by Company’s bankers on behalf of a fellow subsidiary Nil (Previous year `28.03 lacs)