30.12.2012 Views

Download latest annual report - HT Media

Download latest annual report - HT Media

Download latest annual report - HT Media

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

31. Contingent Liabilities<br />

a. During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company<br />

acquired the printing undertaking at New Delhi from<br />

its holding company namely The Hindustan Times<br />

Limited (<strong>HT</strong>L). The writ petition filed by the ex –<br />

workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L challenging the transfer of business<br />

was quashed by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court on<br />

May 9, 2006. Thereafter, the ex-workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L<br />

raised the industrial dispute before Delhi Government,<br />

who referred the dispute to Industrial Tribunal-I,<br />

Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi (Tribunal). During<br />

the course of the proceedings before Tribunal, the<br />

ex-workmen moved application for interim relief. The<br />

Tribunal vide its order dated March 8, 2007, granted<br />

interim relief to the ex-workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L to the extent<br />

of 50% of last drawn wages from the date of such order<br />

till the disposal of the matter<br />

However, <strong>HT</strong>L challenged the said order before<br />

Hon’ble Delhi High Court in a Writ Petition, wherein<br />

the Hon’ble Court modified the order of the Tribunal<br />

to the extent that the amount equivalent to 50% so<br />

received by ex-workmen will be set off against their<br />

retrenchment compensation (not encashed by the<br />

above ex-workmen till date), in the event of <strong>HT</strong>L<br />

succeeding in the writ petition. The Hon’ble Court<br />

further clarified that payment will be made only from<br />

date of the High Court order (i.e. March 23, 2007) till<br />

the disposal of writ petition and it further stayed the<br />

order and proceedings pending before the Tribunal.<br />

The said writ stands disposed of by Delhi High Court<br />

vide order dated 16.01.2009 by holding that it was<br />

agreed between the parties to make the payment to<br />

ex-workmen till the amount of their Retrenchment<br />

Compensation is exhausted. The stay on the<br />

proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal was also<br />

vacated by Hon’ble Delhi High Court and accordingly<br />

proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal has restarted.<br />

The matter after final arguments stands disposed<br />

by the Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal has granted<br />

reinstatement to all the workers with continuity of<br />

services w.e.f. 03.10.2004 in The Hindustan Times<br />

Limited subject to workers refunding the Retrenchment<br />

Compensation received by them. No relief has been<br />

granted against the Company by the Tribunal.<br />

<strong>HT</strong> <strong>Media</strong> Limited<br />

In the meanwhile the workmen in question in the said<br />

Writ Petition has filed contempt petition against The<br />

Hindustan Times Limited and its Directors and same<br />

stands dismissed by Hon’able High Court on 16th<br />

March 2012.<br />

b. Guarantee issued by the Company to Bank against<br />

line of credit sanctioned to <strong>HT</strong> Burda <strong>Media</strong> Limited, a<br />

subsidiary, `3,500 lacs (Previous year `3,500 lacs)<br />

c. Guarantee issued by Company’s bankers on behalf of<br />

<strong>HT</strong> Burda <strong>Media</strong> Limited, a subsidiary, to third parties<br />

`18.00 lacs (Previous year `51.01 lacs)<br />

d. Income tax department has raised a demand of `2.36<br />

lacs (Previous year `2.36 lacs) for the Assessment Year<br />

2004-05 in respect of penalty levied in the assessment<br />

proceedings by Assessing Officer. The Company has<br />

filed an appeal against the order of the Assessing<br />

Officer to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The<br />

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has upheld<br />

the levy of penalty. The Company has filed an appeal<br />

against the order of the Commissioner of Income<br />

Tax (Appeals) to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.<br />

The Company has based on legal advice obtained is<br />

confident of winning the above case and is of view that<br />

no provision is required<br />

32. Segment Information<br />

Identification of Segments<br />

Primary Segment<br />

Business Segment<br />

The Company is presently engaged in the business of<br />

Printing and Publication of Newspapers & Periodicals and<br />

in the business of radio broadcast and all other related<br />

activities through its Radio channels operating under brand<br />

name ‘Fever 104’ in India. Accordingly the Company<br />

has organised its operations into two major businesses:<br />

“Printing and Publishing of Newspapers and Periodicals”<br />

and “Radio Broadcast & Entertainment”.<br />

Secondary Segment<br />

Geographical Segments<br />

The Company’s operations are mostly within India and<br />

do not have operations in economic environments with<br />

different risks and returns. Hence, it is considered operating<br />

in single geographical segment.<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!