Download latest annual report - HT Media
Download latest annual report - HT Media
Download latest annual report - HT Media
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
31. Contingent Liabilities<br />
a. During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company<br />
acquired the printing undertaking at New Delhi from<br />
its holding company namely The Hindustan Times<br />
Limited (<strong>HT</strong>L). The writ petition filed by the ex –<br />
workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L challenging the transfer of business<br />
was quashed by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court on<br />
May 9, 2006. Thereafter, the ex-workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L<br />
raised the industrial dispute before Delhi Government,<br />
who referred the dispute to Industrial Tribunal-I,<br />
Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi (Tribunal). During<br />
the course of the proceedings before Tribunal, the<br />
ex-workmen moved application for interim relief. The<br />
Tribunal vide its order dated March 8, 2007, granted<br />
interim relief to the ex-workmen of <strong>HT</strong>L to the extent<br />
of 50% of last drawn wages from the date of such order<br />
till the disposal of the matter<br />
However, <strong>HT</strong>L challenged the said order before<br />
Hon’ble Delhi High Court in a Writ Petition, wherein<br />
the Hon’ble Court modified the order of the Tribunal<br />
to the extent that the amount equivalent to 50% so<br />
received by ex-workmen will be set off against their<br />
retrenchment compensation (not encashed by the<br />
above ex-workmen till date), in the event of <strong>HT</strong>L<br />
succeeding in the writ petition. The Hon’ble Court<br />
further clarified that payment will be made only from<br />
date of the High Court order (i.e. March 23, 2007) till<br />
the disposal of writ petition and it further stayed the<br />
order and proceedings pending before the Tribunal.<br />
The said writ stands disposed of by Delhi High Court<br />
vide order dated 16.01.2009 by holding that it was<br />
agreed between the parties to make the payment to<br />
ex-workmen till the amount of their Retrenchment<br />
Compensation is exhausted. The stay on the<br />
proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal was also<br />
vacated by Hon’ble Delhi High Court and accordingly<br />
proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal has restarted.<br />
The matter after final arguments stands disposed<br />
by the Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal has granted<br />
reinstatement to all the workers with continuity of<br />
services w.e.f. 03.10.2004 in The Hindustan Times<br />
Limited subject to workers refunding the Retrenchment<br />
Compensation received by them. No relief has been<br />
granted against the Company by the Tribunal.<br />
<strong>HT</strong> <strong>Media</strong> Limited<br />
In the meanwhile the workmen in question in the said<br />
Writ Petition has filed contempt petition against The<br />
Hindustan Times Limited and its Directors and same<br />
stands dismissed by Hon’able High Court on 16th<br />
March 2012.<br />
b. Guarantee issued by the Company to Bank against<br />
line of credit sanctioned to <strong>HT</strong> Burda <strong>Media</strong> Limited, a<br />
subsidiary, `3,500 lacs (Previous year `3,500 lacs)<br />
c. Guarantee issued by Company’s bankers on behalf of<br />
<strong>HT</strong> Burda <strong>Media</strong> Limited, a subsidiary, to third parties<br />
`18.00 lacs (Previous year `51.01 lacs)<br />
d. Income tax department has raised a demand of `2.36<br />
lacs (Previous year `2.36 lacs) for the Assessment Year<br />
2004-05 in respect of penalty levied in the assessment<br />
proceedings by Assessing Officer. The Company has<br />
filed an appeal against the order of the Assessing<br />
Officer to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The<br />
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has upheld<br />
the levy of penalty. The Company has filed an appeal<br />
against the order of the Commissioner of Income<br />
Tax (Appeals) to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.<br />
The Company has based on legal advice obtained is<br />
confident of winning the above case and is of view that<br />
no provision is required<br />
32. Segment Information<br />
Identification of Segments<br />
Primary Segment<br />
Business Segment<br />
The Company is presently engaged in the business of<br />
Printing and Publication of Newspapers & Periodicals and<br />
in the business of radio broadcast and all other related<br />
activities through its Radio channels operating under brand<br />
name ‘Fever 104’ in India. Accordingly the Company<br />
has organised its operations into two major businesses:<br />
“Printing and Publishing of Newspapers and Periodicals”<br />
and “Radio Broadcast & Entertainment”.<br />
Secondary Segment<br />
Geographical Segments<br />
The Company’s operations are mostly within India and<br />
do not have operations in economic environments with<br />
different risks and returns. Hence, it is considered operating<br />
in single geographical segment.<br />
73