04.01.2013 Views

Universal Joints and Driveshafts H.Chr.Seherr-Thoss · F ... - Index of

Universal Joints and Driveshafts H.Chr.Seherr-Thoss · F ... - Index of

Universal Joints and Driveshafts H.Chr.Seherr-Thoss · F ... - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 1 <strong>Universal</strong> Jointed <strong>Driveshafts</strong> for Transmitting Rotational Movements<br />

The advantages <strong>of</strong> the Tracta joint are:<br />

– it transmits movement at articulation angles up to about 32°<br />

– it appears simpler than the double Hooke’s joint<br />

– it can be lubricated well because <strong>of</strong> the large sliding surfaces; the contact faces <strong>of</strong><br />

the joint spheres slide on each other<br />

– it is easy to fit into the swivel <strong>of</strong> a rigid front axle with the joint being located<br />

axially by thrust faces on the bearing bushes.<br />

The disadvantages <strong>of</strong> the Tracta joint are:<br />

– it gets very hot at high speeds due to the sliding movement<br />

– the centre <strong>of</strong> the joint <strong>and</strong> intersection point <strong>of</strong> the rotational axes <strong>of</strong> the joint are<br />

hard to adjust<br />

– an elaborate bearing housing is necessary because the joint has no self-centring.<br />

The Tracta joint was fitted in independent suspension, front wheel drive passenger<br />

cars <strong>and</strong> in the steering knuckles <strong>of</strong> the front axles <strong>of</strong> four wheel drive military personnel<br />

cars. It held a dominant position for 40 years before the arrival <strong>of</strong> the selfcentring<br />

constant velocity ball joint.<br />

1.2.4.2 Various Further Simplifications<br />

Approximate solutions to constant velocity joints were attempted in 1922 by Mechanics<br />

<strong>and</strong> Julie-Marie-René Retel (French patent 550880), in 1930 by Chenard &<br />

Walcker, <strong>and</strong> in 1931 by Hanns Jung for the DKW front wheel drive small car. With<br />

Jung’s solution the displacements occurred in the steering yoke between the input<br />

<strong>and</strong> the shell (Fig. 1.14); the ball pivot formed the mid-point <strong>of</strong> the king pin axis. This<br />

DKW joint worked like a hinge in one direction <strong>and</strong> as a double joint in the other. In<br />

later improved versions the travel <strong>of</strong> the ball pivot was increased through a spherical<br />

joint which was open at both sides. Jung’s hinged joint was fitted in several Auto<br />

Union passenger car models from 1931 to 1963.<br />

In 1949 Marcel Villard designed a five-part joint (Fig. 1.15) which was subsequently<br />

fitted in the Citroën 2 CV small car with front wheel drive. Four parts<br />

(3 – 6), sliding in semicircular recesses allowed articulation <strong>and</strong> rocked on machined<br />

serrations, the axes <strong>of</strong> which intersected in the centre <strong>of</strong> the recesses.<br />

This joint was not any simpler but the durability equalled that <strong>of</strong> the engine.<br />

1.2.4.3 Bouchard’s One-<strong>and</strong>-a-half Times <strong>Universal</strong> Joint<br />

Robert Bouchard developed the double Hooke’s joint for the front wheel drive<br />

Citroën 15 CV car in 1934 (Fig. 1.12a). His experience led him 1949 to the idea <strong>of</strong> a<br />

1 1 / 2 times quasi-homokinetic universal joint [1.16, 1.17].<br />

The wide-angle fixed joint is built up symmetrically <strong>and</strong> consists <strong>of</strong> four main<br />

parts (Fig. 1.16a): the two identical fork-shaped, parts 1, the two identical joint<br />

crosses 2 which interlock <strong>and</strong> which have only three bearing journals each. Theses<br />

are guided in st<strong>and</strong>ard bearing cups 3 <strong>and</strong> are thus able to support the same loads<br />

<strong>and</strong> have the same durability as Hooke’s joints with needle bearings. The ball-shaped<br />

design <strong>of</strong> the joint reduces the amount <strong>of</strong> axial space needed (Fig. 1.16b). The joint

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!