05.01.2013 Views

Features: - Tanker Operator

Features: - Tanker Operator

Features: - Tanker Operator

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INDUSTRY - MARKETS<br />

04<br />

Sale & leaseback as a<br />

financial tool in freight &<br />

credit markets - part 1<br />

By Basil M Karatzas*<br />

As anybody in the shipping industry can attest, prices for shipping assets<br />

have been experiencing their highest levels in recent memory.<br />

Asset appreciation has been more<br />

accentuated in the last four years,<br />

as Graph 1 depicts for five-yearold<br />

tankers - VLCCs, Aframaxes<br />

and MRs. The data is provided by the Baltic<br />

Exchange Sale & Purchase Assessment Index<br />

(BSPA) for which Compass Maritime Services<br />

is a panel member.<br />

Although the asset appreciation is welcome<br />

by shipowners who have had the good fortune<br />

and perspicacity to acquire assets in time, there<br />

is always the strategic consideration of how the<br />

shipowner should be utilising the current state<br />

of the markets by unlocking and deploying the<br />

capital appreciation and optimally positioning<br />

the company for the future.<br />

The selective sale of assets (older vintage,<br />

lower quality vessels, etc) is one obvious<br />

answer. However, for tonnage built in the<br />

early 1990's, the consideration is of<br />

maintaining control of the (still modern) assets<br />

in a strong freight market, and keeping access<br />

to tonnage in order to serve strategic accounts<br />

(charterers with their own cargoes) and<br />

generate operating profits.<br />

One such approach of unlocking capital<br />

gains that has been successfully employed by<br />

several shipowners is the sale & leaseback<br />

transaction (SLB), whereas the shipowner<br />

sells a vessel (a tanker for the purposes of this<br />

article) at today's prevailing market rates and<br />

simultaneously taking back the vessel on<br />

employment for a certain period of the time.<br />

In such transactions, the shipowner frees up<br />

capital which can deployed in any way the<br />

owner sees suitable, optimally by placing<br />

orders to renew and replace the fleet, while at<br />

the same time retaining commercial and<br />

operational control of the tanker for a period<br />

of time in a robust freight market.<br />

In order for such a transaction to become<br />

feasible, several parameters are important and<br />

negotiable between the shipowner and the<br />

lessee, terms such as the period (short term<br />

versus long term) and type of employment<br />

(bareboat versus timecharter employment),<br />

purchase options, if any, and of course the<br />

daily rate that the shipowner will be paying to<br />

the new owner and lessor. Several other<br />

parameters indirectly affect the transaction<br />

such as the credit markets and cost of finance<br />

(for leveraged leases), type of asset class and<br />

assessment of residual risk of the vessel at end<br />

of lease, and finally the credit rating of the<br />

shipowner (an ex-owner and charterer of the<br />

vessel once the transaction has been<br />

consummated).<br />

What type of financial concerns would be<br />

interested in acquiring vessels on such terms?<br />

Leasing companies and investment funds that<br />

specialise in leases due to tax reasons (they<br />

can use depreciation for accounting purposes<br />

versus a tax-free shipowner in most cases), for<br />

residual value reasons (in a market moving<br />

higher vessels can have a market value above<br />

book value and thus offer to the financial<br />

owner an attractive return on investment),<br />

fixed income reasons (low risk, low reward<br />

BP Shipcare<br />

The Professional Lay-up Option<br />

Email: bpshipcare@bp.com<br />

Tel: +44 1932 771571 Fax: +44 1932 771690<br />

return) above cost of finance for a credit<br />

worthy lessor.<br />

From a financial and tax point of view in<br />

the US, leases are categorised as either -<br />

a) Capital or finance leases - long-term<br />

leases covering more that 75% of the<br />

vessel's economic life, with the present<br />

value of the lease rental payments<br />

constituting 90% of the vessel's fair<br />

market value, and whereas the lessee<br />

automatically acquires the asset or has the<br />

option to acquire the asset at a bargain price.<br />

b) Operating leases - which are all noncapital<br />

leases (usually short-term leases<br />

where the lessee does not have an interest<br />

in the vessel after the termination of the<br />

lease).<br />

There is also the distinction of 'wet lease'<br />

versus 'dry lease' [in the former, the lessor<br />

provides crewing (timecharter in shipping<br />

terms), in the latter the lessor provides the<br />

vessel alone (bareboat charter)]. A couple<br />

more leasing terms to keep in mind are the<br />

'net lease' where all costs associated with<br />

insurance, taxes, maintenance are paid by the<br />

lessee/charterer, and the 'leveraged lease'<br />

where the lessor arranges financing through a<br />

long-term creditor.<br />

Commercial applications<br />

Having covered the basic terminology, it's<br />

time to turn to the commercial applications of<br />

leasing in shipping.<br />

When negotiating the terms of a sale &<br />

Your answer to<br />

a low freightrate<br />

environment and<br />

standdown<br />

periods<br />

Website: www.bpshipcare.com<br />

Tel: +60 87 415277 Fax: +60 87 415330<br />

clean seas safe ships commercial success<br />

TANKER<strong>Operator</strong> � August/September 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!