The pilot area of Auronzo di Cadore (Belluno) - Università Ca

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Tab. 6 List of actors to invite to the workshop each criterion was calculated by summing the individual answers. Then, x the first criteria per category of sustainability were aggregated. In order to maintain anonymity, the order of the scores in the single answers is random (Table 7). 3.6 / Possible actions of tourism developments Similarly, respondents were also asked to rank certain actions according to how useful they considered them for the development of more competitive tourism in the Auronzo. a b c d e Those actions in Table 8 which ranked 5, 8, 9, 10, and 11 were outlined by some interviewees and as such, not posited to all, which may explain the higher presence of “0” and their overall low ranking. A better coordination between the various stakeholders emerges as an utter priority for the development of a sound strategy for the future. The above results on criteria selection and development actions’ identification contributed to the drafting of three (plus one foreseeing no changes in the status quo) initial strategic options that were then refined with stakeholders in the next phase. 26 CATEGORY SUB-CATEGORY N. OF PARTICIPANTS Government / para-government Tourist housing / feeding Tourists' entertainment Tourists'/events' management Facilities both for locals and tourists f Tourists 1 Public administration x2 2 Technical office x1 3 “Regole” (family communal bodies) x1 4 Hotels/Restaurants x4 5 Chalets x2 6 Agrotourisms x1 7 Estate-agents x1 8 Construction companies x1 9 Skiing schools x2 10 Skiing resort x1 11 Skiing-unrelated activities (indoor sports, spa, ice-karts, pubs) 12 Alpine guides x2 13 Italian Alpine Club (CAI) x1 14 Tourist office x1 15 Tourism board x1 16 Business x2 17 Press x1 18 Emergency organisations (alpine rescue, civil protection body) 19 With holiday homes 20 Without holiday homes x1
Tab. 7 Criteria’s ranking Tab. 8 Identification of tourism development actions 27 SOCIAL TOT RANK Job opportunities Soc1 5 5 5 5 2 4 5 2 3 4 5 4 3 5 4 2 63 1 Social integration Soc2 4 4 5 5 2 3 5 2 3 4 3 4 2 3 3 2 54 3 Services Soc3 4 3 5 5 5 2 5 2 3 5 4 5 3 4 3 3 61 2 ECONOMIC TOT Human fluxes in arrival Eco1 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 3 2 5 3 4 4 3 62 3 Apportionment of the inv’s / benefits btw whole area Investment costs / funding Eco2 4 4 5 5 3 2 5 4 2 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 64 1 Eco3 5 3 4 2 5 5 3 4 2 3 4 2 5 4 5 3 59 4 Extra winter income Eco4 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 3 2 3 5 3 5 3 63 2 ENVIRONMENTAL TOT Pollution Env1 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 2 5 5 3 5 5 3 5 72 1 Deforestation --> landslides Env2 4 3 5 3 3 3 5 5 2 5 5 3 5 2 3 2 58 3 Landscape Env3 4 3 3 4 2 3 5 4 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 5 59 2 SCENARIOS SCORE TOT RANK FEASIBILITY To expand skiing area 2 3 5 4 3 4 4 5 5 4 3 5 5 4 4 4 64 2 To augment off-piste facilities (snow shoes and back-country itineraries, snowparks) 2 0 5 4 3 5 4 3 5 4 3 5 5 4 3 4 59 3 To open mountain chalets in winter times 3 4 0 4 5 5 4 4 2 5 4 2 5 4 4 4 59 3 To create more spa facilities 0 5 0 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 1 4 2 57 6 To solve fragmentation tourist offices and operators To invest in attractions for young tourists (e.g. bars, climbing hall,..) To promote experience exchange and better collaboration with other resorts 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 1 5 1 4 66 1 0 0 5 3 0 4 4 5 4 4 3 5 4 5 1 3 50 7 5 5 4 4 5 4 0 2 1 5 4 5 3 5 3 3 58 5 To create natural parks (e.g. UNESCO site) 5 3 2 3 0 0 0 4 5 4 3 4 5 4 3 4 49 10 To develop the primary sector 5 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 14 11 To improve receiving capacities of the area (and adapt them to new type of tourism) To increase availability of skiing unrelated activities (e.g. ice-karts, sleigh pistes,…) 5 0 3 5 4 5 0 4 4 3 0 0 4 4 3 4 48 9 0 0 5 5 0 5 4 5 2 2 3 5 4 0 3 4 47 8 low confidence high confidence low confidence mid confidence mid confidence
Page 1: Climate change and its impacts on t
Page 4 and 5: work group Balbi S. 1,2 , Bonzanigo
Page 6 and 7: 5.1.4 5.2 6 6.1 6.1.1 6.2 6.3 7 Fig
Page 8 and 9: Preface The mountain area of the Ve
Page 10 and 11: 1 / Introduction: the ClimAlpTour p
Page 12 and 13: Fig. 1 Project’s structure for st
Page 14 and 15: Box 1 The report in brief 2 / Venet
Page 16 and 17: Fig. 3 The Three Peaks of Lavaredo
Page 18 and 19: conceived during the EU FP5 project
Page 20 and 21: culating environmental indicators,
Page 22 and 23: Box 2 SNA in brief 3 / Phase 1 / Ac
Page 24 and 25: (3) As it appears, tourists were ex
Page 26 and 27: Tab. 4 Characteristics of Auronzo
Page 30 and 31: Box 3 Participatory development of
Page 32 and 33: Fig. 8 GIS map of areas of interest
Page 34 and 35: Fig. 10 Strategy SKINT after brains
Page 36 and 37: Tab. 10 Factors characterising wint
Page 38 and 39: Box 4 DSS design in brief 5 / Phase
Page 40 and 41: CLIMATE SCENARIO Tab. 13 CURRENT A1
Page 42 and 43: Fig. 15 Example of Google Earth bas
Page 44 and 45: 5.1.3 / Agent-Based Model (AWS1.0 )
Page 46 and 47: Fig. 17 ClimAlpTour e-tool’s cata
Page 48 and 49: Fig. 20 Indicators’ clustering 46
Page 50 and 51: Fig. 21 Weight elicitation exercise
Page 52 and 53: Fig. 23 Strategies ranking after we
Page 54 and 55: the need of defining a commonly agr
Page 56 and 57: ponentially increased the number of
Page 58: References 56 Balbi et al. (2011).

The pilot area of Auronzo di Cadore (Belluno) - Università Ca

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?