09.01.2013 Views

the field artillery journal - Fort Sill - U.S. Army

the field artillery journal - Fort Sill - U.S. Army

the field artillery journal - Fort Sill - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE FIELD ARTILLERY JOURNAL<br />

wherever it occurs; it prohibits <strong>the</strong> effective use of a method of<br />

fire included in our drill regulations; it reduces <strong>the</strong> rapidity of<br />

fire; it affects <strong>the</strong> accuracy of fire."<br />

10. Extraneous devices and appliances or spring<br />

components which take up this play have <strong>the</strong> objection that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y increase <strong>the</strong> wear and reduce <strong>the</strong> rapidity of operation. A<br />

radical change in design should certainly not be resorted to<br />

until evidence amounting to proof is at hand that it is worth<br />

while. Troubles in interchangeability and large additional costs<br />

occasioned by a change in design are especially to be avoided.<br />

11. Pages 537 and 539. "If Captain Campana classes<br />

carriages which fail to suppress <strong>the</strong> jump as only entitled to <strong>the</strong><br />

term accelerated fire, what should <strong>the</strong> classification be when<br />

<strong>the</strong> operation of loading materially disturbes <strong>the</strong> laying?"<br />

Apropos of <strong>the</strong> subject of <strong>the</strong> Deport type of carriage certain<br />

experiments at Rock Island Arsenal in 1912 are pertinent. A<br />

comparative road test of 300 miles was given a service 3-inch<br />

carriage and a Deport carriage purchased by <strong>the</strong> Ordnance<br />

Department, U. S. A. After <strong>the</strong> test <strong>the</strong> lost motion in elevating<br />

traversing parts of <strong>the</strong> foreign carriage was more than twice as<br />

much as that in ours; but more important still was <strong>the</strong> fact that<br />

lost motion in <strong>the</strong> foreign carriage materially affected its<br />

accuracy, as comparatively slight jolts of <strong>the</strong> gun would<br />

derange <strong>the</strong> setting eight or ten mils, in both elevation and<br />

traverse; such jolts as would have no measurable effect on<br />

ours. Even before <strong>the</strong> road test a proof officer from his<br />

experience at <strong>the</strong> Sandy Hook Proving Ground stated to <strong>the</strong> writer<br />

that it was very difficult for him to obtain any regularity in <strong>the</strong><br />

firing of this Deport carriage owing to <strong>the</strong> lost motion in <strong>the</strong><br />

elevating and traversing mechanisms. These remarks are inserted<br />

with no view of decrying acknowledged merits of <strong>the</strong> Deport<br />

construction with regard to <strong>the</strong> facilities offered for rapid fire,—<br />

<strong>the</strong> stability of <strong>the</strong> carriage itself, <strong>the</strong> independent line of sight,<br />

<strong>the</strong> wide <strong>field</strong> of traverse and elevation, and <strong>the</strong> semi-automatic<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!