11.01.2013 Views

Workshop

Workshop

Workshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

scantily, and still others are not available at all! (For example, I don’t know of anybody who makes a<br />

decoder for the popular Internet chat package ICQ. ICQ is a fairly proprietary service.)<br />

Is this a disaster? Not really. Even though the analyzer can’t decode the service so that you can read it,<br />

it’s still capturing what’s going on. If you’re working with tech support for a proprietary service, you can<br />

bet that they’ll be able to read your trace using in-house decoders. After all, for our purposes, one of the<br />

primary reasons to use a network analyzer is to capture evidence to submit to a vendor, and if the vendor<br />

can’t decode its own service, we’re all in trouble.<br />

Dave, I’m Afraid I Can’t Analyze That<br />

Some network analyzers have an “expert” mode, which, during packet capture, makes a guess at what<br />

could be wrong with your network. In theory, this is wonderful. You and I can’t sort through hundreds of<br />

conversations at once; this is the sort of job that’s well suited to a computer.<br />

In practice? Well, my experience with “expert” analyzers has convinced me that they’re somewhat less<br />

than expert. Sure, they pick up on workstations that are running slowly—they’re very good at seeing that<br />

a workstation has a significant delay in responding to a request. They’re also good at seeing duplicate IP<br />

addresses and other simple problems. But expert? Not really. Idiot savant would be more like it. In my<br />

opinion, a complex network problem must be dealt with by a human; there are just too many unknowns,<br />

too many guesses, and too much intuition involved to have a computer do it. Teaching a computer how to<br />

solve complex network issues would probably be just as hard as teaching a computer how to think.<br />

I definitely don’t want to run down analyzers with an “expert” feature—they can be really useful for<br />

common simple problems. Just don’t think of an expert analyzer as a panacea for all your hard network<br />

problems. However, in combination with your own situation analysis, expert analyzers can be very<br />

powerful allies in your troubleshooting wars; they tend to point you to bona fide problems that need<br />

further investigation.<br />

Previous Table of Contents Next

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!