11.01.2013 Views

Workshop

Workshop

Workshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S: The problem might be network congestion.<br />

O: The problem occurs at the same time on different major network segments.<br />

A: Login congestion is likely on major segments, but not as likely on a segment with fewer users.<br />

P: Check maps and try the applet on a “low traffic” network segment (perhaps nearer to the<br />

Internet segment and away from segments with server login traffic on them).<br />

You deploy your plan: You temporarily set up a workstation at point C on the map. When you try the<br />

applet at 8:00, it works! You have now pointed the finger squarely at network congestion. The next<br />

question is, whose problem is this? In other words, is this something that the applet vendor is responsible<br />

for, or is this your problem for having a network that’s too busy?<br />

Your response to this problem may vary. On one hand, it may be practical to move this person to a less<br />

busy segment. However, this might not work, because you can see from your physical maps that the<br />

network segments near PCs tend to have a lot of PCs on them and are smack in the middle of the servers.<br />

In other words, physical constraints might prevent you from putting this person on a segment without<br />

other PCs, because the only hubs near her probably are being used for other users. A hub with less traffic<br />

might be in your data center or in another building, outside of her physical reach. (The smart aleck might<br />

ask, “Why not ask this person to stop doing her work process at 8:00 in the morning?” Not a great<br />

solution—the network is supposed to work, darn it!)<br />

At this point, if you really needed to have this person’s workstation live on a busier segment, you have to<br />

start application troubleshooting. Why is it that this person doesn’t have any other problems, say, with<br />

local applications? As you’ll see in Hour 19, “Internet/Intranet Troubleshooting,” comparing a local<br />

application to an Internet application isn’t a good idea; using Internet applications is like taking an<br />

international flight versus hopping in your car to go to the store. Lots of things can happen between here<br />

and Paris. You write down your SOAP again:<br />

S: Applet is not working; other applications are.<br />

O: The applet is the only Internet application in the mix.<br />

A: Internet applications are not local applications.<br />

P: Try a different Internet application during peak hours.<br />

You’ve now done five SOAP lists. Long and tedious, isn’t it? Yet, as you can see, SOAP is a powerful<br />

process for refining what you know, as well as a way to take guesses and turn them into fact and a way to<br />

keep you moving forward.<br />

You try a different Internet application at 8:00 the next morning, and it works like a champ. Even though<br />

it doesn’t do exactly the same thing, at least you’re now comparing apples to apples—that is, a firewalldependent<br />

wide-area application to another firewall-dependent wide-area application. You try yet another<br />

Internet application, just to make sure, and it, too, works just dandy. Here’s your latest SOAP:<br />

S: The application itself seems to be at fault.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!