11.01.2013 Views

CITO - Phase I Report - Industry Training Authority

CITO - Phase I Report - Industry Training Authority

CITO - Phase I Report - Industry Training Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FERENCE WEICKER & COMPANY<br />

Elements Description<br />

Additional<br />

Information<br />

Required<br />

Sources of<br />

Information<br />

OVERVIEW OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL MODEL<br />

• Confirm that <strong>CITO</strong> is to be responsible for the area<br />

• Process involved in the development of NOA/exams<br />

• Roles of lead agency/other key participants from the jurisdiction<br />

• Resource requirements (people/other)<br />

• Sources of funding<br />

• ITA staff<br />

• <strong>CITO</strong> staff<br />

• Canadian Council of Directors of Apprenticeship<br />

E. POSSIBLE CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING OPTIONS<br />

There will be various options through which <strong>CITO</strong> could fulfill its key functions. Some of the possible<br />

criteria that could be used to evaluate these options include:<br />

� Fit with the objectives, mandate, and values of <strong>CITO</strong>. In its service plan for 2007-08, <strong>CITO</strong><br />

defined its mandate as providing industry leadership in training which results in the right number of<br />

workers, with the right knowledge and skills, developed to the right standards, and available at the<br />

right time and for the right needs. Key values include:<br />

• Customer-focused (apprentices and employers);<br />

• Innovative, with the fullest possible utilization of best practices and emerging technology;<br />

• Inclusive, with due consideration given to the views of all participants in the ICI construction<br />

sector and of the broader stakeholder community; and<br />

• Transparent, with clear accountabilities and disclosures regarding performance measures.<br />

� Cost-effectiveness, taking into consideration the cost of the process relative to the value of the<br />

outputs.<br />

� Ease of implementation.<br />

� Level of stakeholder support as evidenced, in part, by the feedback from consultation processes<br />

in Component 4.<br />

� The level of risk including legal liability, organizational credibility and financial risk.<br />

� Flexibility in terms of the ability of the function to change or evolve over time and meet the needs<br />

of a wide range of trades and stakeholders.<br />

� Quality of outputs generated including the ability to meet the key objectives of the functions and<br />

the needs of the target groups.<br />

� Consistency with good business practices, taking into consideration best practices and lessons<br />

learned locally and in other jurisdictions.<br />

Development of a Full-Service Model for <strong>CITO</strong> Page 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!