12.01.2013 Views

Fic rEcommEndationS - Eurobank EFG

Fic rEcommEndationS - Eurobank EFG

Fic rEcommEndationS - Eurobank EFG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Although there is a possibility for the current employees<br />

to undergo evaluation of their working ability in order<br />

to be recognised as persons with disabilities, in practice<br />

such procedure is very complex and administratively<br />

cumbersome, as it includes submission of numerous<br />

documents by the employee and engagement of different<br />

state authorities during one process, with somewhat<br />

overlapping powers (National Employment Service and<br />

FPDI);<br />

In practice, a majority of employers opt for payment to<br />

the state budget instead of employment of persons with<br />

disabilities, mostly as they do not have the need for additional<br />

workforce or as they cannot find adequate persons<br />

with disabilities for the work they require.<br />

the Law on Foreigners<br />

Obtaining business visas and temporary residence permits<br />

is an excessively complicated and time-consuming process.<br />

Besides the time required for collecting the numerous required<br />

documents for approval of the residence permit, the<br />

waiting period as of the date of submitting all documents<br />

until the issue of the residence permit is one month. This<br />

period is too long, as for this period of time the foreigner<br />

is not able to temporarily import any of his/her belongings<br />

from abroad, to start working, etc.<br />

The foreigners who apply for work permit from the National<br />

Employment Service (NES) upon acquiring residence<br />

permit are faced with an additional bureaucratic procedure<br />

which, amongst other, requires submission of the opinion<br />

that the NES itself had already issued to these foreigners<br />

during the procedure for acquiring residence permit.<br />

the Law on the Protection of the citizens of the<br />

Federal republic of Yugoslavia Working abroad<br />

The terminology of this Law is not completely harmonised<br />

with the Labour Law and other positive regulations.<br />

The prescribed procedure for hiring Serbian employees<br />

abroad is outdated, extraordinarily clumsy, complicated,<br />

it takes very long and, as a whole, is not adjusted to the<br />

requirements of modern market economy and removing<br />

borders on the labour market. As such, it has a countereffect,<br />

instead of fulfilling its main purpose – protecting our<br />

citizens employed abroad. Furthermore, without the im-<br />

� top<br />

plemented procedure – informing the competent Ministry<br />

of Labour and Social Policy about the intention of sending<br />

an employee abroad to work and its conclusion that conditions<br />

for it have been fulfilled, one cannot obtain health<br />

insurance for employees valid abroad at the Republic Institute<br />

for Health Insurance, in accordance with regulations in<br />

the Republic of Serbia (RS).<br />

Staff leasing<br />

The staff leasing practice of companies in Serbia, although<br />

somewhat tolerated in practice, due to the lack of formal<br />

regulation at this time may lead to certain problems for the<br />

employers who use this institute. Namely, there is a possibility<br />

of fining such employers due to the fact that persons<br />

working for them based on staff leasing do not have any<br />

agreement with these employers. Also, there is a risk (in<br />

certain cases evident in practice) that the leased staff claim<br />

that they were actually employed within the company<br />

where they performed work, although they did not have<br />

any agreement with such company – this is usually the case<br />

when they are dismissed due to termination of business cooperation<br />

between the staff leasing agency and the company<br />

that used these services.<br />

Shift work<br />

The Labour Law does not define the concept and characteristics<br />

of shift work, which is in practice a source of significant<br />

problems.<br />

Namely, in the absence of precise regulations, the competent<br />

courts and the Ministry of Labour have tended to interpret<br />

the concept of shift work too extensively, considering<br />

the shift work as such work in which there is a difference<br />

in the beginning and end of working hours and recognising<br />

the right to increased pay on the basis of such de facto<br />

understood shift work in all cases, unless the internal document<br />

of the employer and employment contract explicitly<br />

stipulate that employees perform work in shifts, and that<br />

the increase in pay based on shift work is included in the<br />

agreed amount of base salary, which are formulations almost<br />

non-existent in the Serbian economy.<br />

Since the Labour Law provides for a 26% salary increase<br />

based on shift work, this represents an intolerable burden for<br />

the vast majority of employers in the Republic of Serbia.<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!