14.01.2013 Views

The Arithmetic of Quaternion Algebra

The Arithmetic of Quaternion Algebra

The Arithmetic of Quaternion Algebra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.3. EXAMPLES 115<br />

that the difference <strong>of</strong> K is totally principal in the restrict sense and denote by<br />

H the unique quaternion field( up to isomorphism )which is totally defined over<br />

K and unramified at the finite places. Let R, Rd be the integer ring <strong>of</strong> K and<br />

its difference respectively.<br />

Proposition 5.3.6. <strong>The</strong> maximal R-orders <strong>of</strong> H equipped with the scalar product:<br />

x · y = T K/Q(d −1 t(x¯y)<br />

are the unimodular, even lattice <strong>of</strong> dimension 8n.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. Recall that the inverse <strong>of</strong> the difference is the dual <strong>of</strong> the integer ring R<br />

<strong>of</strong> K with respect to the bilinear form T K/Q(x¯y) defined by the trace T K/Q <strong>of</strong><br />

K over Q. Let O be a maximal R-order <strong>of</strong> H. It is clear that O is isomorphic<br />

to a Z-lattice <strong>of</strong> dimension 8n. It should prove that the bilinear form defined in<br />

the proposition is equivalent to the usual scalar product, or in another words,<br />

the quadratic form defined by q(x) = 2T K/Q(d −1 n(x)) is positively definite. In<br />

fact, x ∈ H × implies That d −1 n(x) is totally positive and the trace is strictly<br />

positive.<br />

We verify that<br />

a) x · y ∈ Z and x · x ∈ 2Z, because the inverse <strong>of</strong> the difference Rd −1 were sent<br />

to each other by the trace in Z.<br />

b) O is equal to its dual O ′ = {x ∈ H|T K/Q(d −1 t(xO)) ⊂ Z = {x ∈ H|t(xO) ∈<br />

R} because H is not ramified at the finite places.<br />

<strong>The</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> Leech lattice.<br />

For the reasons prior to the curiosity <strong>of</strong> a non-specialist in the theory od finite<br />

groups which is justified by the presence <strong>of</strong> the binary icasahedral group in the<br />

automorphisms <strong>of</strong> Leech’s lattice, <strong>The</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> Tits for the lattice utilizes<br />

the quternion field H which is totally defined and unramified over K = Q( √ 5).<br />

We have seen that a maximal R-order O equipped with the scalar product in<br />

the precedent proposition is a unimodular even lattice<strong>of</strong> order 8, and recall that,<br />

if τ = (1 + √ 5)/2, <strong>The</strong>n<br />

R = Z[1, τ] and x · y = T K/Q(2x¯y/(5 + √ 5)).<br />

We shall observe later that the only integers x which are totally positive in R<br />

<strong>of</strong> trace T K/Q(x) ≤ 4 are<br />

(1) 0, 1, 2, τ 2 = (3 + √ 5)/2, τ −2 = (3 − √ 5)/2.<br />

Although it is not used here, it bears in mind that we have given an explicit<br />

R-basis <strong>of</strong> an order O in exercise. <strong>The</strong> unit group <strong>of</strong> reduced norm 1 <strong>of</strong> O<br />

denoted by O 1 is isomorphic to the icosahedral binary group <strong>of</strong> order 120, and<br />

contains the cubic roots <strong>of</strong> unit. Let x be one <strong>of</strong> them, put e = x + τ. We can<br />

prove immediately that n(e) = 2, and e 2 = emod(2).<br />

We denote by h the standard hermitian form <strong>of</strong> the H-vector space H 3 :<br />

h(x, y) = � xi¯yi, if x = (xi) and y = (yi) belong to H 3 ,<br />

from it we deduce on that on R 24 there is a scalar product induced by the<br />

Q-bilinear form <strong>of</strong> Q-vector space H 3 <strong>of</strong> dimension 24:<br />

x · y = T K/Q(2h(x, y)/(5 + √ 5))

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!