14.01.2013 Views

The Arithmetic of Quaternion Algebra

The Arithmetic of Quaternion Algebra

The Arithmetic of Quaternion Algebra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116CHAPTER 5. QUATERNION ARITHMETIC IN THE CASE WHERE THE EICHLER CONDITI<br />

. <strong>The</strong> Leech lattice is the lattice in R 24 equipped with the above scalar product<br />

and defined by one <strong>of</strong> the following equivalent ways:<br />

(a) L = {x ∈ O 3 |ex1 ≡ ex2 ≡ ex3 ≡ � ximod(2)},<br />

(b) L is the free O-module <strong>of</strong> basis f = (1, 1, e), g = (0, ē, ē), h = (0, 0, 2).<br />

we shall prove that we obtain rightly the Leech lattice. Actually the lattice L is<br />

– even, since x, y ∈ Z, and x · x ∈ 2Z, it is evident.<br />

– unimodular, since if x ∈ H3 the equality x·L ⊂ Z is equivalent to h(x, L) ⊂ 2R<br />

and the definition (b) shows the last inclusion is equivalent to x ∈ L.<br />

– not contains any element x such that x · x = 2. Otherwise x ∈ L, x · x = 2,<br />

then put ri = n(xi). It follows that � ri = 2, and since the elements ri are<br />

totally positive, (1) implies that one <strong>of</strong> them at least should be annihilated. <strong>The</strong><br />

definition (a) <strong>of</strong> lattice implies then that exi ∈ 2O for every 1 ≤ i ≤ 3, From it<br />

we have 2n(xi) ∈ 4R and xi ∈ 2O. Taking again the same reason, we see that<br />

at most one <strong>of</strong> xi is nonzero and ri ∈ 4R, It leads to a contradiction.<br />

E Tables.<br />

If H is a quaternion algebra totally defined over Q, i.e. HR = H the Hamilton<br />

quaternion field, <strong>of</strong> reduced discriminant D = �<br />

p∈Ram(H) p, the class number and the type number <strong>of</strong> t<br />

are given by the formulae:<br />

h = h(D, N) = 1 �<br />

(p−1)<br />

12<br />

�<br />

(p+1)+ 1<br />

4 f(D, N)(1) + 1<br />

3 f(D, N)(3) �<br />

−r<br />

, t = 2<br />

p|D<br />

p|N<br />

where r is the number <strong>of</strong> prime divisors <strong>of</strong> DN,<br />

f(D, N) (m) = �<br />

(1 − ( d(−m)<br />

))<br />

p<br />

�<br />

(1 + ( d(−m)<br />

)<br />

p<br />

p|D<br />

d(−m), h(−m) are the discriminant and the class number <strong>of</strong> Q( √ m) respectively.<br />

�<br />

−m, if m ≡ −1mod(4)<br />

d(−m) =<br />

, d(−1) = −4, d(−3) = −3,<br />

−4m, if m ≇ −1mod(4)<br />

g(D, N) (m) = 2 �<br />

(1 − ( d(−m)<br />

))<br />

p<br />

�<br />

(1 + ( d(−m)<br />

)), defined if N is even.<br />

p<br />

Set:<br />

p|D<br />

p|(N/2<br />

p|N<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨ 1, if m ≇ −1mod4<br />

a(m) = 2,<br />

⎪⎩<br />

4,<br />

�<br />

if m ≡ 7mod8 or m = 3 ,<br />

if m ≡ 3mod8 and m �= 3<br />

b(m) =<br />

a(m),<br />

3,<br />

if m ≇ 3mod8 or m = 3<br />

if m ≡ 3mod8 and m �= 3 ,<br />

the number tr(m) are the traces <strong>of</strong> the Brandt matrices P (Zm) for m|DN:<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨ f(D, N)<br />

2tr(m) =<br />

⎪⎩<br />

(m) h(−m), if D is even<br />

f(D, N) (m) h(−m)a(m),<br />

g(D, N)<br />

if DN is odd<br />

(m) h(−m)b(m),<br />

.<br />

if N is even<br />

m|DN<br />

tr(m)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!