14.01.2013 Views

The Arithmetic of Quaternion Algebra

The Arithmetic of Quaternion Algebra

The Arithmetic of Quaternion Algebra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 CHAPTER 2. QUATERNION ALGEBRA OVER A LOCAL FIELD<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. We shall lead an absurdity. If Lnr was not contained in H, then for every<br />

x ∈ O, x /∈ R, the extension K(x)/K would be ramified. <strong>The</strong>re exists then<br />

a ∈ R such that x − a ∈ P ∩ K(x). We could then write x = a + uy with y ∈ O.<br />

Iterating this procedure, the element x could be written as �<br />

n≥0 anun , an ∈ R.<br />

<strong>The</strong> field K(u) being complete would be closed. We thus had O ⊂ K(u). It is<br />

absurd.<br />

Corollary 2.1.7. <strong>The</strong> quaternion field H is isomorphic to {Lnr, π}.Its prime<br />

ideal P + Ou satisfies P 2 = Oπ. Its integer ring O is isomorphic to RL + RLu.<br />

<strong>The</strong> reduced discriminant d(O) <strong>of</strong> O equals n(P ) = Rπ.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. According to I, Corollary 2.2 and 2.4, we have H � {Lnr, x} where<br />

x ∈ K × but x /∈ n(L × nr). From (1), (2) <strong>of</strong> the beginning <strong>of</strong> this chapter it<br />

follows x = πy 2 where y ∈ K × . We can suppose x = π , then the first part <strong>of</strong><br />

the corollary follows. Now suppose H = {Lnr, π}. <strong>The</strong> element u ∈ H satisfying<br />

I.(1) is the non zero minimal valuation, thus P = Ousatisfies P 2 = Oπ. <strong>The</strong><br />

prime ideal Rπ is then ramified in O. according to Lemma 1.4, we have O =<br />

{h ∈ H, n(h) ∈ R}. similarly, RL = {m ∈ Lnr, n(m) ∈ R}. We can verify easily<br />

that, if h = m1 + m2u with mi ∈ Lnr, the property n(h) ∈ R is equivalent<br />

to n(mi) ∈ R, i = 1, 2. We can show too that O = RL + RLu. Using the<br />

formula involving the determinant in I, Lemma 4.7, we compute the reduced<br />

discriminant d(O). Since d(RL) = R, we see easily that d(O) = Rπ. Hence it<br />

follows d(O) = n(P ) or the different <strong>of</strong> O is O ⋆−1 = P .<br />

Definition 2.4. Let Y/X be a finite extension <strong>of</strong> field equipped with a valuation,<br />

and ring <strong>of</strong> it is AY , AX = X ∩ AY . Let PY , PX = PY ∩ AX be the prime ideals<br />

and kX, kY be the corresponding residue field. <strong>The</strong> residue degree f <strong>of</strong> Y/X is<br />

the degree [kY : kX] <strong>of</strong> the residue extension kY /kX. <strong>The</strong> ramification index <strong>of</strong><br />

Y/X is the integer e such that AY PX = P e Y .<br />

We then deduce that the unramified quadratic extension Lnr/K has the<br />

ramification index 1, and the residue degree 2. <strong>The</strong> quaternion field H/K has<br />

the ramification index 2, and the residue degree 2.<br />

Let F/K be a finite extension <strong>of</strong> commutative field with ramification index e<br />

and residue degree f. We have ef = [F : K] because the cardinal <strong>of</strong> k is finite<br />

and RF /πRF � RF /πF e RF , if πF is a uniform parameter <strong>of</strong> F .<br />

Lemma 2.1.8. <strong>The</strong> following properties are equivalent:<br />

(1) f is even,<br />

(2) F ⊃ Lnr,<br />

(3) F ⊗ Lnr in not a field.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. For the equivalence (1) ←→ (2) see Serre [1],Ch. 1. For the equivalence<br />

(2) ←→ (3), it is convenient to write Lnr as the K[X]/(P (X)) where (P (X)) is<br />

a polynomial <strong>of</strong> degree 2. Thus F ⊗ Lnr equals F [X]/(P (X))F where (P (X))F<br />

is the ideal generated by (P (X)) in the polynomial ring F [X]. Since P (X) is a<br />

polynomial <strong>of</strong> degree 2, it is reducible if and only if it admits a root in F , i.e. if<br />

F ⊃ Lnr.<br />

Consider now HF � {F ⊗ Lnr, π}. If πF is a uniform parameter <strong>of</strong> F , it may<br />

as well suppose that π = πF e . According to I. Corollary 2.4, and Lemma 1, we<br />

find that, if e or f are even then we have HF � M(2, F ), hence F neutralizes<br />

H. Otherwise, that is to say if [F : K] is odd, HF � {F ⊗ Lnr, πF } ,where

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!