16.01.2013 Views

D-BAUG - Departement Bau, Umwelt und Geomatik - ETH Zürich

D-BAUG - Departement Bau, Umwelt und Geomatik - ETH Zürich

D-BAUG - Departement Bau, Umwelt und Geomatik - ETH Zürich

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Highlights ▪ Infrastructure Systems / Highlights ▪ Resources<br />

In situ tests on steel deck concrete<br />

composite slabs at Zurich International<br />

Airport<br />

Is the load bearing capacity after 35 years in<br />

service still sufficient?<br />

by M. Klippel, M. Knobloch, M. Fontana / IBK<br />

Terminal B at Zurich International Airport has been used by<br />

millions of tourists and business people. To implement<br />

the European Schengen agreement, the terminal has to be<br />

reconstructed after 35 years in service (Fig. 1).<br />

The terminal was built in 1974, basically as a steel frame<br />

construction with profiled steel sheeting as supporting<br />

structure. Does this structure still meet the current safety<br />

and serviceability standards or will it have to be replaced?<br />

The decision regarding demolition or modification, with all<br />

the associated economic and ecologic effects, has to be<br />

based on a firm fo<strong>und</strong>ation. Generally, how does the loadbearing<br />

behaviour of composite constructions change over<br />

the years? How appropriate are our design rules for assessing<br />

the capacity of existing and intensely used structures?<br />

The bond between steel sheeting and concrete is the critical<br />

factor for the load-bearing capacity of composite slabs.<br />

How has the bond between the concrete and the steel<br />

changed during 35 years of intensive use? Is it still sufficient?<br />

To clarify this and further questions, large-scale tests<br />

were performed in situ on the composite slabs at Zurich International<br />

Airport (Fig. 2).<br />

Useful data was generated by these tests to enable the assessment<br />

of the composite slabs. The tests showed that a<br />

sufficient bond still exists between the steel sheets and the<br />

concrete and that current design rules properly assess the<br />

load-bearing capacity of structures after long-term use.<br />

60 ▪ D-<strong>BAUG</strong> Annual Report 2009<br />

Shear band propagation in soils as a<br />

mechanism of tsunamigenic landslides<br />

Via physical tests an analytical model has<br />

been validated which provides an approach<br />

to calculate initial landslide velocity of sub-<br />

merged tsunamigenic landslides.<br />

by E. Saurer, A. M. Puzrin / IGT<br />

Conventional geotechnical methods to analyze the failure<br />

mechanisms of submerged slides tend to <strong>und</strong>erestimate<br />

the real height of the resulting tsunami wave. In this<br />

study, an approach has been developed, which includes<br />

dynamic analysis of the landslide mechanism. This approach<br />

accounts for an initial landslide velocity, which justifies<br />

larger tsunami wave height predictions.<br />

The analytical model is based on the phenomenon of progressive<br />

and catastrophic shear band propagation in soils<br />

and on the energy balance approach from fracture mechanics.<br />

In order to validate this model, the rate of the<br />

progressive shear band propagation has been studied using<br />

physical trapdoor- and shear-blade tests and compared<br />

to the analytical solution (Fig. 5a, 5b).<br />

When applied to the dynamic process of catastrophic shear<br />

band propagation in slides, this energy balance approach<br />

allowed for an analytical solution for the initial landslide<br />

velocity to be derived (Fig. 6a).<br />

Application of the obtained analytical solution to historic<br />

and recent submerged landslides, such as the Weggis slide<br />

in Lake Lucerne (Fig. 6b), confirmed that this approach is an<br />

appropriate tool to explain more realistic tsunami wave<br />

heights.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!