20.01.2013 Views

Water Cycle Study - East Devon District Council

Water Cycle Study - East Devon District Council

Water Cycle Study - East Devon District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ref EWCS April 2010<br />

Exeter and <strong>East</strong> <strong>Devon</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Cycle</strong> <strong>Study</strong><br />

Exeter Countess Wear<br />

6.4.5 Exeter Countess Wear WwTW has the consented capacity for the total development<br />

scenario of 21,500 new homes up to 2026. This scenario does not breach the current<br />

flow consent. The Environment Agency have stated that they have concerns regarding the<br />

discharges from Countess Wear as the WwTW discharges to the Exe Estuary which<br />

contains a SPA and Ramsar site. The Exe estuary is considered to have elevated nutrient<br />

levels due to the inputs from WwTWs and diffuse agricultural sources within the<br />

catchment. Due to these elevated nutrient levels, the estuary may be vulnerable to<br />

biological instabilities in the future if a nutrient concentration ‘tipping-point’ is reached.<br />

6.4.6 The EA state in their response to the Draft RSS Panel Report that; “with monitoring in<br />

place to detect early signs of stress in the estuary ecosystem, and scope for action on nutrient<br />

loads in the Exe into the future from both point and diffuse sources across the catchment, we<br />

consider that this provides sufficient safeguards for development to move forward at Exeter.” [EA<br />

2006]<br />

6.4.7 We therefore do not consider water environmental capacity to be a constraint to growth<br />

in Exeter. However, we recommend that Exeter City, the Environment Agency and<br />

South West <strong>Water</strong> work in partnership to develop a monitoring and development<br />

intervention programme to manage the risk of deterioration in the Exe.<br />

Cranbrook<br />

6.4.8 Once operational, the proposed Cranbrook WwTW will discharge to the River Clyst.<br />

Cranbrook WwTW has planned consented capacity for growth up to 2021 (7500<br />

dwellings) but for growth beyond this level the flow consent will be breached. The River<br />

Clyst is currently at moderate physiochemical status and poor biological and ecological<br />

status. The consent for the new works will have taken the <strong>Water</strong> Framework Directive<br />

standards into account, therefore the poor status should not be considered as a<br />

constraint to growth.<br />

6.4.9 In order to meet WFD good status the BOD and ammonia consents may require<br />

tightening as part of the River Basin Management Plan activities. As the ammonia consent<br />

is currently at 2, this may require a tightening which is beyond best available technology<br />

(currently considered to be at 1mg/l), although this is not considered likely.<br />

Axminster (Kilmington)<br />

6.4.10 Axminster (Kilmington) WwTW discharges to the River Axe. There is consented capacity<br />

at the WwTW for the 1000 additional dwellings up to 2026. However, the River Axe is<br />

currently at moderate physiochemical status and is at poor biological and ecological<br />

status. Therefore the BOD and ammonia consents may require tightening to meet WFD<br />

good status.<br />

6.4.11 The EA state in their response to the Draft RSS Panel Report [EA 2006] that although<br />

they have concerns regarding the River Axe already failing its phosphate standard, due to<br />

recent nutrient stripping initiatives, they consider that there is capacity for the levels of<br />

development proposed in this catchment.<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!