20.01.2013 Views

Water Cycle Study - East Devon District Council

Water Cycle Study - East Devon District Council

Water Cycle Study - East Devon District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Exeter and <strong>East</strong> <strong>Devon</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Cycle</strong> <strong>Study</strong><br />

Exmouth Maer Lane<br />

6.4.12 There is no consented capacity for growth at Exmouth Maer Lane WwTW as the flow<br />

consent is breached by the 2011 (500 dwellings) growth projections. In terms of water<br />

quality consents, as this is a tidal discharge with UV, the water quality consents are<br />

unlikely to require changing.<br />

6.4.13 The Environment Agency is currently in advanced discussions to determine a new consent<br />

application for Exmouth Maer Lane WwTW, which will increase the consented dry<br />

weather flow to a value in excess of the flow forecasted for 2026 by this study (Table<br />

6.2). The Environment Agency has made the necessary assessments (based on a design<br />

horizon of 2016-2021) and awaits formal submission of the consent application.<br />

6.4.14 Any further spatial allocation at either Exmouth or Budleigh Salterton will require that<br />

this variation of the existing consent at Exmouth Maer Lane WwTW is granted by the<br />

Environment Agency, and that South West <strong>Water</strong> plan for the implementation of any<br />

associated infrastructure capacity improvements in advance of, or in phase with<br />

development.<br />

Colyton<br />

6.4.15 Colyton WwTW has consented capacity for growth up to 2016 (500 dwellings) however<br />

our calculations forecast that the flow consent will be breached by 2021. Colyton<br />

WwTW discharges to the River Axe (approximately 75m upstream of Axe Bridge on the<br />

A3052), via a long outfall line. The River Axe is currently at moderate physiochemical<br />

status and is at poor biological and ecological status. Therefore the BOD consent may<br />

require tightening to meet WFD good status. There is no ammonia consent currently set<br />

at this WwTW .<br />

6.4.16 The EA state in their response to the Draft RSS Panel Report [EA 2006] that although<br />

they have concerns regarding the River Axe already failing its phosphate standard, due to<br />

recent nutrient stripping initiatives, they consider that there is capacity for the levels of<br />

development proposed in the catchment.<br />

Honiton<br />

6.4.17 Honiton WwTW has the consented capacity for all projected growth up to 2026.<br />

Honiton WwTW discharges to the River Otter which meets WFD good status in terms<br />

of physiochemical status, however it is classified as poor for both biological and ecological<br />

status. It is not considered that the WwTW discharge is the cause of the poor ecological<br />

status. However, should further assessment determine that the WwTW does contribute<br />

to the poor status, a quality consent might be needed. This should not be considered a<br />

barrier to growth at the scale planned, and any improvements will be identified through<br />

the RBMP process.<br />

Ottery Town<br />

6.4.18 Ottery Town WwTW has the consented capacity for all projected growth up to 2026.<br />

Currently there is a BOD consent of 30 mg/l and no ammonia consent has been set.<br />

Ottery Town WwTW discharges to the River Otter which is moderate in terms of<br />

physiochemical status and classified as poor for both biological and ecological status. To<br />

meet WFD good status WwTW improvements may be needed and a tighter quality<br />

59 Ref EWCS April 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!