22.01.2013 Views

ICEM11 Final Program 9.7.11pm_ICEM07 Final Program ... - Events

ICEM11 Final Program 9.7.11pm_ICEM07 Final Program ... - Events

ICEM11 Final Program 9.7.11pm_ICEM07 Final Program ... - Events

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstracts Session 7<br />

300 years. This longer timeframe presents possible regulatory and technical issues with regard to both storage safety and security.<br />

Issues associated with maintaining security for very long-term storage are being identified and addressed. An assessment has been<br />

performed of security regulations, including those from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the DOE, for impacts over<br />

the longer timeframe. The characterization of UNF as self-protecting...<br />

SESSION 7 — NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ER PROGRAMS (4.2)<br />

1) OBJECTIVES FOR REMEDIATION OF AREAS POLLUTED BY<br />

RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES IN FRANCE (w/oP-59300)<br />

Charlotte Cazala, Didier Gay, Olivier Chabanis, Jerome Guillevic, IRSN; Odile Palut Laurent,<br />

Geraldine Dandrieux, ASN; Alain Thomassin, IRSN/DRPH/SER/UETP; Chapalain Estelle,<br />

Laurence Roy, Ministère de lEcologie, du Développement Durable, des Transports et du Logement (France)<br />

In the 90s, the French administration has developed several tools in order to inventory potentially polluted sites and to identify<br />

those requiring an immediate action. Concerns and needs have gradually moved on and a methodology for the management of<br />

selected areas was established. A general framework was then published by the Ministry of Ecology in 2007.<br />

The Ministry of Ecology jointly with the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) asked the Institute for Radiological Protection and<br />

Nuclear Safety (IRSN) to establish guidelines for the management of radioactive polluted areas . Requirements were: i) to fit with<br />

the published general framework while highlighting specificities of radioactive pollutants management; ii) to take benefit of<br />

radioactive polluted areas remediation; iii) to precise remediation objectives and iv) to develop stakeholders involvement issues.<br />

Within this general framework, two situations were identified: i) the polluted area is already used for domestic, public or industrial<br />

purposes; ii) the polluted area is an industrial site under dismantling or a polluted wasteland where a redevelopment project is<br />

under consideration.<br />

Management of a polluted site with ongoing use is based on the pollution level determination. This level can be compared to<br />

threshold values defined in applicable regulations when such threshold values do…<br />

2) REMEDIATION OF AREVA MIRAMAS SITE (w/oP-59312)<br />

Gilles Potier, AREVA (France)<br />

Remediation of AREVA Miramas site<br />

Objectives : The objectives of this project is to remediate the former facility by performing all operations useful and necessary<br />

enabling a final withdrawal of CEA and AREVA NC companies. The desired end state is a remediated site for a new industrial use<br />

Environmental Context : The various studies have demonstrated and confirmed the presence of soil contaminations. The types<br />

and ranges of pollution could clearly be attributed to different historical activities : metals; mercury and organic compounds. However,<br />

due to the different constraints (Mercury regulation, urban proximity, slick ...) and to a particular sensitivity (AREVA operator,<br />

site located in a urban area), the project cannot be limited to the strict regulatory requirements<br />

Description of operations : The operations concerns the remediation of approximately 100 000 m3 of soil and the decommissioning<br />

of facilities. Soil remediation focuses on two major pollutants: mercury and organo-nitro compounds, located in areas well<br />

identified. The techniques applied will be...<br />

3) THE VALUE OF A MATURE, STABLE, AND TRANSPARENT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK<br />

IN FACILITATING ER PROGRAMS LESSONS LEARNED IN DECOMMISSIONING OF<br />

URANIUM RECOVERY AND OTHER FACILITIES IN THE USA (w/oP-59411)<br />

Keith I. McConnell, Larry Camper, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USA)<br />

The history of decommissioning activities in the United States has demonstrated the value of a mature, stable and transparent<br />

regulatory framework in facilitating the timely completion of environmental remediation. Two examples are given as case studies.<br />

The first example relates to the history of uranium concentrate (yellowcake) production in the U.S. to support the initial development<br />

of civilian nuclear power in the U.S. in the 1950s, 60s, 70s and 80s. This yellowcake production, which took place mostly in<br />

the western U.S., was undertaken before laws and regulations to prevent contamination and protect public health and safety were<br />

fully developed. Significant contamination occurred in terms of both surface and ground water contamination. Although most conventional<br />

mills producing uranium during these early years entered decommissioning in the 70s and 80s, the vast majority are still<br />

remediating their sites because of persistent contamination in ground water. Had an effective regulatory framework been in place,<br />

much of this contamination would have been prevented and remediation accomplished more effectively. In contrast to this experience,<br />

a second example is provided related to development of the regulatory framework for decommissioning of non-uranium<br />

recovery facilities in the U.S. in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Prior to this...<br />

4) THE FIRST NEW CONVENTIONAL URANIUM MILL IN THE U.S. IN 30 YEARS LICENSING<br />

OF THE PINON RIDGE PROJECT, COLORADO, USA (w/oP-59330)<br />

Steve Brown, SENES Consultants Ltd; Frank Filas, Energy Fuels Resources, Lakewood, (USA)<br />

Energy Fuels Resources Corporation (EFR) has recently received a radioactive material license from the US State of Colorado<br />

and intends to construct and operate a conventional acid leach uranium and vanadium mill at the Piñon Ridge Mill site in western<br />

Montrose County, Colorado. Site facilities will include an administration building, a 17- acre mill; three tailing cells totaling 90<br />

acres, a 40-acre evaporation pond (expandable capacity to 80 acres), a 6-acre ore storage pad, and an access road. The mill will<br />

process ore produced from mines within a reasonable truck-hauling distance, mostly from the historical Uravan mineral belt of the<br />

Colorado Plateau (Four Corners region of the States of Utah, Colorado, Arizona and New Mexico) and will have a capacity of 500<br />

tons per day, but is designed to accommodate subsequent expanded production capacity of up to 1,000 tons per day. The expected<br />

operating life of the mill is 20 to 40 years, depending on the production rate.<br />

The Piñon Ridge mill is subject to regulation by the state of Colorado as a Agreement State with the U.S. Nuclear regulatory<br />

Commision under the U.S. Atomic Energy Act. Accordingly, the mill license (radioactive source material license) that was issued<br />

in January…<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!