ICEM11 Final Program 9.7.11pm_ICEM07 Final Program ... - Events
ICEM11 Final Program 9.7.11pm_ICEM07 Final Program ... - Events
ICEM11 Final Program 9.7.11pm_ICEM07 Final Program ... - Events
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Session 7 Abstracts<br />
5) INTEGRATED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FOR MAJOR NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING<br />
AND ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION PROJECTS (w/oP-59068)<br />
John Lehew, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (USA)<br />
CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M HILL) is the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) contractor responsible<br />
for the safe, environmental cleanup of the Hanford Sites Central Plateau, sections of the Columbia River Corridor and the Hanford<br />
Reach National Monument.<br />
The 586-square-mile Hanford Site is located along the Columbia River in southeastern Washington, U.S.A. A plutonium production<br />
complex, housing the largest volume of radioactive and contaminated waste in the nation, with nine nuclear reactors and<br />
associated processing facilities, Hanford played a pivotal role in the nation’s defense for more than 40 years, beginning in the 1940s<br />
with the Manhattan Project. Today, under the direction of the DOE, Hanford is engaged in one of the world’s largest environmental<br />
cleanup project.<br />
The Plateau Remediation Contract is a 10-year project paving the way for closure of the Hanford Site. The site through its location,<br />
climate, geology and proximity to the Columbia River in combination with the results of past nuclear operations presents a<br />
highly complex environmental remediation challenge. The complexity is not only due to the technical issues associated with<br />
decommissioning nuclear facilities, remediating soil contamination sites, dispositioning legacy waste and fuel materials and integrating<br />
these with the deep vadose zone and groundwater remediation,…<br />
6) EPRI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM (w/oP-59341)<br />
Karen Kim, Electric Power Research Institute (USA) - Presentation by Sean Bushart, EPRI (USA)<br />
The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is a non-profit research organization that supports the energy industry. The<br />
Nuclear Power Plant Groundwater Protection <strong>Program</strong> conducts research related to the management of groundwater at nuclear<br />
power plant sites.<br />
Experiences at decommissioned and operating nuclear power plants show that leaks and spills from plant systems, structures,<br />
and components and work practices can lead to contamination on on-site soils and groundwater. While the levels of radioactivity<br />
resulting from such contamination events do not pose health and safety threats to the public, they have raised stakeholder concerns<br />
and, in some cases, have required remediation during decommissioning to meet site-release criteria. The EPRI Nuclear Power Plant<br />
Groundwater Protection <strong>Program</strong> provides technical support and guidance to the industry for prevention of leaks and spills, early<br />
detection of leaks and spills, monitoring of groundwater contamination, prevention of off-site migration of groundwater contamination,<br />
and remediation of groundwater and soil contamination. The EPRI Groundwater Protection <strong>Program</strong> is composed of two<br />
main objectives: 1) provide technical guidance and 2) develop advanced technologies.<br />
The cornerstones of the EPRI Groundwater Protection <strong>Program</strong> are the EPRI Groundwater Protection Guidelines for Nuclear<br />
Power Plants and the EPRI Groundwater and Soil Remediation Guidelines. These Guidelines documents<br />
7) CLEAN UP STRATEGIES AND RESULTS IN USIN SITE IN SÃO PAULO CITY, BRAZIL (w/oP-59243)<br />
Rodrigo Raposo de Almeida, Federal Fluminense University;<br />
Valter J.G. Mortágua, Industrias Nucleares do Brasil (Brazil)<br />
This paper presents the experience of the team of technicians and consultants from INB (Industrias Nucleares do Brazil SA)<br />
in activities related to environmental remediation of soils contaminated by radionuclides of natural series of uranium and thorium<br />
in the USIN unit (old mill Interlagos).<br />
In 2007 was elaborated a master plan for remediation the USIN site, after 6 months the plan was approved by CNEN, the<br />
nuclear regulatory agency in Brazil. Given the lack of a final deposit of radioactive residues in Brazil, the elaborate plan aimed to<br />
minimize the volume of radioactive waste final. A criterion was developed to fractionate the tailings at three levels. The waste level<br />
1, with activity of 226Ra and 228Ra below 0.5 Bq/g and the effective dose of less than 1.0 mSv/yr, may remain in the area. The<br />
waste level 2, with activity of 226Ra and 228Ra than 0.5 Bq/g and individual effective dose exceeding 1,0 mSv/yr, but with total<br />
activity below 30 Bq/g may be disposed in municipal landfills. The waste level 3, with total activity above 30 Bq/g should be stored<br />
in steel drums of 200 liters and stored in a radioactive residues warehouse.<br />
Considering that the time for radiometric analysis is…<br />
8) APPLICATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION METHODOLOGY:<br />
THEORY VS. PRACTICE. REFLECTIONS AND TWO BELGIAN CASE STUDIES (wP-59184)<br />
Koen Mannaerts, Stephane Pepin, Boris Dehandschutter,<br />
Walter Blommaert, Federal Agency for Nuclear Control (FANC) (Belgium)<br />
Like in many countries, polluted industrial sites also exist in Belgium. Although the contamination is purely chemical in most<br />
cases, they may also contain a radioactive component. For chemically contaminated sites, extensive regulations and methodologies<br />
were already developed and applied by the different regional authorities. However and essentially because radioactivity is a federal<br />
competence, there was also a necessity for developing a legal federal framework (including an ER-methodology) for remediation<br />
of radioactive contaminated sites. Most of the so-called radioactive contaminated sites are exhibiting a mixed contamination<br />
(chemical and radiological), and hence the development of such methodology had to be in line with the existing (regional) ones<br />
concerning chemical contamination. Each authority having their own responsibilities with regard to the type of contamination, this<br />
makes it more complicated and time-consuming finding the best solution satisfying all involved parties. To overcome these difficulties<br />
the legal framework and methodology - including the necessary involvement of the stakeholders and delineation of each partys<br />
responsibilities - has to be transparent, clear and unambiguous.<br />
Once the methodology is developed as such and approved, the application of it is expected to be more or less easy, logic and<br />
straightforward. But is this really true? The aim this…<br />
62