23.01.2013 Views

2005-IGM-SPG 10.pdf - Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change ...

2005-IGM-SPG 10.pdf - Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change ...

2005-IGM-SPG 10.pdf - Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dr. Matthews then explained the rationale behind the recommendations <strong>for</strong> funding<br />

proposals short-listed at Stage 2 of the Proposals Process. The <strong>SPG</strong> members' ratings<br />

<strong>for</strong> scientific excellence and average score were used as the main basis <strong>for</strong> the<br />

funding recommendations. Other major factors included written reviews by the global<br />

change international community, budgetary aspects and regional balance. Dr.<br />

Matthews acknowledged the APN's appreciation to the international peer review<br />

community <strong>for</strong> providing detailed comments on Stage 2 proposals. After detailed<br />

discussion on the proposals being recommended, as well as the system used <strong>for</strong><br />

scoring and ranking the proposals, the <strong>IGM</strong> agreed on the funding recommendations<br />

made by the <strong>SPG</strong> as follows:<br />

• 5 continuing multi-year projects;<br />

• 15 new projects;<br />

• 4 projects to receive a seed grant;<br />

• 1 project to be funded under CAPaBLE.<br />

•<br />

The list of projects is provided as Attachment IV.<br />

<strong>IGM</strong> and <strong>SPG</strong> Joint Session<br />

17. CAPaBLE Programme Update<br />

Dr. Amir Muhammed presented an update on the CAPaBLE Programme by giving a<br />

brief history of CAPaBLE since its launch in March 2003. Dr Muhammed discussed the<br />

<strong>for</strong>mation of the CAPaBLE Standing Committee and that it reports to the <strong>IGM</strong><br />

annually and to the Steering Committee when acting on behalf of the <strong>IGM</strong><br />

intersessionally. Dr. Muhammed then discussed the first Call <strong>for</strong> Proposals <strong>for</strong><br />

Capacity Building that was distributed among member countries in December 2004.<br />

Dr. Muhammed confirmed that US$ 105,000 from last year’s budget, i.e. the<br />

2004/<strong>2005</strong> fiscal budget, was available <strong>for</strong> funding projects under this call, in which<br />

13 proposals were received. Dr Muhammed continued his presentation by making a<br />

recommendation to the <strong>IGM</strong> that the first 4 proposals on the ranking list provided be<br />

awarded <strong>for</strong> funding with the 2004/<strong>2005</strong> unspent budget of US$ 105,000. Dr<br />

Muhammed then presented the available budget <strong>for</strong> <strong>2005</strong>/2006 activities as outlined<br />

in the table below:<br />

CAPaBLE Budget <strong>2005</strong>/2006 Total: US$ 520,000<br />

1. MY Projects: Comprehensive Research $180,000<br />

CRP (Shukla) $90,000 (max. pending review)<br />

CRP (Khan) $90,000 (max. pending review)<br />

2. MY Projects: Capacity Building $275,000<br />

Multi-Year Project (Koshy) $50,000 (max. pending review)<br />

Multi-Year Project (Nakane) $40,000 (max. pending review)<br />

3. New Capacity Building Projects $185,000<br />

Dr. Muhammed explained that from the available US$ 520,000, US$ 180,000 was<br />

allocated <strong>for</strong> two continuing multi-year comprehensive research projects and that<br />

US$ 90, 000 was allocated <strong>for</strong> two continuing multi-year capacity building projects.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, US$ 185,000 is available <strong>for</strong> new capacity building activities in <strong>2005</strong>/2006.<br />

Recommendations were then made to the <strong>IGM</strong> that the remaining proposals, from<br />

the original 13, are returned with feedback and comments from reviewers and that<br />

the proponents are asked to rewrite and resubmit their proposals to compete <strong>for</strong> the<br />

available US$ 185,000. It was clarified that only proposals considered suitable under<br />

the CAPaBLE Programme would be asked to resubmit. A deadline was confirmed <strong>for</strong><br />

the end May <strong>2005</strong>, with assurance from the Secretariat that all proponents would be<br />

� 9 �

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!