23.01.2013 Views

2005-IGM-SPG 10.pdf - Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change ...

2005-IGM-SPG 10.pdf - Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change ...

2005-IGM-SPG 10.pdf - Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

87<br />

5-Year Trend of Pre-Proposals Submitted<br />

101<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

52<br />

Number of Pre-Proposals<br />

43<br />

64<br />

<strong>IGM</strong>/10/07-01<br />

<strong>SPG</strong>/10/07-01<br />

Report on 2004 Annual Regional Call <strong>for</strong> Proposals (ARCP) 2<br />

1. Pre-proposals: 64 received<br />

• For Table of Pre-proposals see: <strong>IGM</strong>10/07-01/Appendix 1<br />

<strong>SPG</strong>10/07-01/Appendix 1<br />

• Number received slightly higher compared with 43 and 52 in 2003 and 2002<br />

respectively. Number of pre-proposals received is 87 in 2001 and 101 in 2000.<br />

• 31% submitted a full proposal.<br />

• 18 of the 20 pre-proposals submitted as full proposals advanced to Rapid<br />

Assessment Stage process, 2 were rejected. All of those18 full proposals<br />

passed to stage 1 of review process.<br />

• 13 of the 20 pre-proposals (65%) submitted as full proposals passed<br />

to final stage and have been short-listed to receive funding.<br />

2. Full-proposals: 56 received (5 were ineligible)<br />

• For Table of Full Proposals see: <strong>IGM</strong>10/07-01/Appendix 2<br />

<strong>SPG</strong>10/07-01/Appendix 2<br />

• Number of eligible full proposals (51) received is up 6% on 2003, the number<br />

of proposals was manageable this year, given that 19 reviewers responded<br />

in the review process.<br />

• Eight full proposals were eliminated at the Rapid Assessment Stage (RAS);<br />

leaving 43 full proposals were reviewed by the Scientific Planning Group at<br />

Stage One.<br />

• Thirty proposals (70%) advanced to the final stage (cut-off line was set at<br />

scores of 6 and above).<br />

• Twenty one external mail reviewers were selected according to their area of<br />

interest and expertise to provide comments on a number of “borderline<br />

proposals.<br />

2 This report is on the “Process” and will not cover proposals recommended <strong>for</strong><br />

funding.<br />

�48�

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!