31.01.2013 Views

Empirical life cycle models of labour supply and - Statistisk sentralbyrå

Empirical life cycle models of labour supply and - Statistisk sentralbyrå

Empirical life cycle models of labour supply and - Statistisk sentralbyrå

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Social <strong>and</strong> Economic Studies 91 <strong>Empirical</strong> Life Cycle Models<br />

where<br />

qt qt<br />

— f<br />

1 4-- Rt+i qt+i<br />

is the user price <strong>of</strong> durables. Since Rt+i depends on the marginal taxation <strong>of</strong><br />

interest incomes, the user price is endogenous.<br />

At this moment we notice that if preferences are non-separable both between<br />

<strong>and</strong> within period's, all the marginal utilities depend on the consumption <strong>of</strong> all<br />

goods in all periods, <strong>and</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> a particular first order condition is very<br />

data dem<strong>and</strong>ing even if we could observe A. If preferences are additively<br />

separable between, but not within periods (<strong>and</strong> the monotonic transformation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>life</strong>time preferences is the identity transformation), the marginal utilities for<br />

a particular period all depend on the consumption <strong>of</strong> all goods in that period,<br />

<strong>and</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> a particular first order condition requires less data. If,<br />

however, preferences are both intra- <strong>and</strong> intertemporal additively separable, <strong>and</strong><br />

the monotonic transformations <strong>of</strong> both intra- <strong>and</strong> intertemporal preferences are<br />

the identity transformation, the marginal utilities only depend on the<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> the actual good, <strong>and</strong> estimation is considerably simplified.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> no binding credit market constraints in any historic period as well<br />

as no binding constraints in the <strong>labour</strong> <strong>and</strong> credit market in the current period,<br />

yt , -7, 1 <strong>and</strong> at equal zero. If we also assume additive within-period utility <strong>and</strong><br />

that the monotonic transformation (1) t <strong>of</strong> within period preferences is the<br />

identity transformation, the Frisch dem<strong>and</strong> functions become<br />

(23) Ct Ct [(I -I- P) t AoDtPt] t --= 0, 1, • .•,T,<br />

(24) _Kt Kt [(I -I- P) t Àoptqut] t = 0, 1, . . . ,T ,<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

(25) lit lit [(1 P) tAoptrnt] , t = 0, 1, . ,T ,<br />

where the Ce-, Kt- <strong>and</strong> lit-functions are the inverse <strong>of</strong> the functions for the<br />

subutilities <strong>of</strong> C, K <strong>and</strong> H respectively.<br />

This specification illustrates the advantage <strong>of</strong> what MaCurdy (1981) labels the<br />

A-constant dem<strong>and</strong> functions. In the case <strong>of</strong> no binding constraints in any<br />

historic period in the credit market, no current binding constraints in the credit<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>labour</strong> markets, <strong>and</strong> inter- <strong>and</strong> intraperiod additive separable preferences<br />

with 4:1)t equal to the identity transformation, the arguments <strong>of</strong> the dem<strong>and</strong><br />

functions, apart from the discounting rate, are reduced to prices observable<br />

within the current period <strong>and</strong> the (latent) <strong>life</strong> <strong>cycle</strong> component Ao. This means<br />

that with the exception <strong>of</strong> the information that is included in Dt , mt <strong>and</strong> qut , Äo<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!