23.12.2012 Views

amidiq - dae uptlax

amidiq - dae uptlax

amidiq - dae uptlax

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

304<br />

J. L. Arredondo-Figueroa et al./ Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Química Vol. 6, No. 3 (2007) 301-308<br />

Table 3. Average values (standard deviation) of physicochemical parameters<br />

and nitrogenous compounds registered during the experiment.<br />

Load rate (kg) Sample<br />

points<br />

pH T (°C) D.O<br />

(mg/l)<br />

TAN<br />

(mg/l)<br />

NH3<br />

(mg/l)<br />

194 FT 8.5<br />

ST<br />

BI<br />

RT<br />

a<br />

(0.17)<br />

8.5 a<br />

(0.13)<br />

8.4 a<br />

(0.08)<br />

8.5 a<br />

20.5<br />

(0.07)<br />

a<br />

(1.0)<br />

20.5 a<br />

(1.2)<br />

20.4 a<br />

(1.0)<br />

19.6 a<br />

6.4<br />

(1.0)<br />

a<br />

(1.8)<br />

4.6 b<br />

(1.7)<br />

5.8 a<br />

(1.8)<br />

7.2 a<br />

1.96<br />

(2.6)<br />

a<br />

(0.69)<br />

1.03 b<br />

(0.28)<br />

0.36 c<br />

(0.09)<br />

0.26 c<br />

0.11<br />

(0.06)<br />

a<br />

(0.04)<br />

0.07 a<br />

(0.02)<br />

0.01 b<br />

(0.01)<br />

0.02 b<br />

(0.01)<br />

156 FT 8.5<br />

ST<br />

BI<br />

RT<br />

a<br />

(0.17)<br />

8.4 a<br />

(0.13)<br />

8.3 a<br />

(0.08)<br />

8.5 a<br />

19.1<br />

(0.07)<br />

a<br />

(1.0)<br />

19.0 a<br />

(1.2)<br />

19.0 a<br />

(1.0)<br />

19.0 a<br />

7.7<br />

(1.0)<br />

a<br />

(1.8)<br />

5.9 b<br />

(1.7)<br />

6.1 a<br />

(1.8)<br />

7.0 a<br />

1.73<br />

(2.6)<br />

a<br />

(0.33)<br />

0.91 b<br />

(0.19)<br />

0.37 c<br />

(0.14)<br />

0.22 c<br />

0.08<br />

(0.08)<br />

a<br />

(0.02)<br />

0.06 a<br />

(0.02)<br />

0.01 b<br />

(0.01)<br />

0.01 b<br />

(0.01)<br />

89 FT 8.6<br />

ST<br />

BI<br />

RT<br />

a<br />

(0.17)<br />

8.5 a<br />

(0.13)<br />

8.3 a<br />

(0.08)<br />

8.6 a<br />

18.9<br />

(0.07)<br />

a<br />

(1.1)<br />

19.6 a<br />

(1.2)<br />

18.9 a<br />

(1.0)<br />

18.0 a<br />

7.0<br />

(1.0)<br />

a<br />

(1.8)<br />

5.4 b<br />

(1.7)<br />

6.3 a<br />

(1.8)<br />

7.4 a<br />

1.27<br />

(2.6)<br />

a<br />

(0.42)<br />

0.64 b<br />

(0.08)<br />

0.25 c<br />

(0.05)<br />

0.22 c<br />

0.07<br />

(0.04)<br />

a<br />

(0.02)<br />

0.05 a<br />

(0.01)<br />

0.01 b<br />

(0.01)<br />

0.01 b<br />

(0.01)<br />

a,b,c<br />

Different superscript letters in columns, mean significant differences (p ≤ 0.05)<br />

FT = Fish tank; ST = Settling tank; BI = Biofilter; RT = Reconditioning tank.<br />

Preliminary tests results showed that all<br />

requirement for a good nitrification rate in a wellaerated<br />

culture system were fulfilled in this study;<br />

presence of ammonia, dissolved oxygen, trace<br />

nutrients, and a relative low level of organic carbon<br />

in the biofilter. During the experimental period,<br />

average water temperature varied between 18.0 and<br />

20.5 °C. The highest values were registered during<br />

the first phase of the experiment with no significant<br />

differences (p ≥ 0.05) among sampling sites and<br />

phases (Table 3). However, average temperature at<br />

the reconditioning tank (RT) in the first phase was<br />

slightly lower with respect to other sampling sites.<br />

Dissolved oxygen fluctuated from 4.6 to 7.7<br />

mg/l, the lowest values were observed in the settling<br />

tank (ST), due that all wastes were accumulated and<br />

concentrated in this site. Significant differences (p ≤<br />

0.05) were observed among sampling sites<br />

particularly in the ST, and it can be attributed to an<br />

increase in water temperature. Oversaturated values<br />

were registered in the fish tank (FT) and<br />

reaconditioning tank (RT), where a vigorous aeration<br />

was maintained throughout the experiment.<br />

However, average oxygen concentration was 6.4<br />

mg/l, a larger value than that required for complete<br />

oxidation. Therefore, it can be assumed that it is<br />

necessary to maintain an optimum growth and<br />

survival rate of the rainbow trout (Klontz, 1991).<br />

NO2 -<br />

(mg/l)<br />

0.44 a<br />

(0.22)<br />

0.64 b<br />

(0.26)<br />

0.41 a<br />

(0.22)<br />

0.24 c<br />

(0.15)<br />

0.41 a<br />

(0.10)<br />

0.61 b<br />

(0.14)<br />

0.40 a<br />

(0.10)<br />

0.25 c<br />

(0.12)<br />

0.44 a<br />

(0.10)<br />

0.59 b<br />

(0.19)<br />

0.32 c<br />

(0.15)<br />

0.28 c<br />

(0.13)<br />

NO3 -<br />

(mg/l)<br />

25.9 a<br />

(4.5)<br />

24.5 a<br />

(2.6)<br />

24.9 a<br />

(3.4)<br />

23.5 a<br />

(3.1)<br />

28.6 a<br />

(3.4)<br />

27.5 a<br />

(2.8)<br />

27.2 a<br />

(2.2)<br />

27.0 a<br />

(3.6)<br />

26.9 a<br />

(4.6)<br />

22.7 b<br />

(9.0)<br />

23.3 b<br />

(8.3)<br />

25.5 b<br />

(3.5)<br />

Results in Table 3 agreed with those reported<br />

by Kruner and Rosenthal (1987) and Michaud et al.,<br />

(2006) for fish culture systems. pH values were<br />

almost constant throughout the experiment with<br />

minor variations. These values had no significantly<br />

differences (p ≥ 0.05) between sampling sites and<br />

phases. Nitrification depends on the release of<br />

inorganic nitrogen compounds from organic matter<br />

usually degraded by heterotrophs. Normally,<br />

nitrification rates are strongly influenced by pH. Srna<br />

and Baggaley (1975) observed that the establishment<br />

of nitrifying bacteria and conditions in which they<br />

grow determine their response to pH changes.<br />

Optimum pH for complete nitrification is circa 7.45,<br />

effective nitrification is achieved within a pH range<br />

of 7.0 to 8.2. Wild et al. (1971) reported that the<br />

optimum pH for nitrification in freshwater was 8.4,<br />

which coincides with the value found in our study.<br />

Total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) range was<br />

between 0.22 and 1.96 mg/l. The higher load fish<br />

rate (194 kg) coincides with higher TAN value.<br />

Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were observed<br />

among load fish rates, with highly significant<br />

differences in fish and settling tanks. Total ammonia<br />

oxidation in the three load rates was similar<br />

throughout the study meaning that metabolism of<br />

nitrifying microorganisms were near their maximum<br />

(Table 3). No adverse effects were observed on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!